Sheltered Workshops: United States v. Rhode Island

Abstract

Federal legislation, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504, and the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, mandates that individuals with disabilities be integrated in all aspects of life from education to employment to independent living. A recent development involves a settlement reached between the United States and the State of Rhode Island/City of Providence regarding sheltered workshops. States must ensure the availability of a continuum of alternative settings that span from restrictive (e.g., sheltered workshops) to fully integrated, community-based, competitive employment. The use of sheltered workshops as categorical, permanent, segregated practice is discriminatory.

Keywords

law legal policy transition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.

Butterworth

Hall

A. C.

Smith

F. A.

Migliore

Winsor

(2011). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes. Boston: University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq.

Metzel

D. S.

Foley

S. M.

Butterworth

. (2005). State-level agency agreements for supported employment of people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16, 102–114.

National Disability Rights Network. (2011). Segregated and exploited: The failure of the disability service system to provide quality work. Retrieved from http://www.ndrn.org/images/Documents/Resources/Publications/Reports/Segregated-and-Exploited.pdf

Olmstead v. L.C, 527 U.S. 581. (1999).

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 et seq.

Stephens

D. L.

Collins

M. D.

Dodder

R. A.

(2005). A longitudinal study of employment and skill acquisition among individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26(5), 469-486.

10.

Storms

O’Leary

Williams

(2000). Transition requirements: A guide for states, districts, schools, universities and families. Eugene: University of Oregon, Western Regional Resource Center.

11.

Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12134 (1990).

12.

U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. (2014). Olmstead enforcement: U.S. v. Rhode Island, 1:14-cv-00175 (D.R.I. 2014). Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/olmstead/olmstead_cases_list2.htm#ri

13.

U.S. General Accounting Office. (2001). Centers offer employment and support services to workers with disabilities, but labor should improve oversight (GAO-01-886). Retrieved from http://gao.justia.com/department-of-labor/2001/9/special-minimum-wage-program-gao-01-886/

14.

U.S. v. Rhode Island and City of Providence, 1:13-cv-00442 (D.R.I. 2013).