This article provides an overview of effective instructional strategies and interventions for kindergarten and first-grade students at risk in mathematics. The article reviews instructional strategies and interventions within a multitier instructional model in order to provide a framework for teachers and schools looking to increase the effectiveness of their instructional support in the area of mathematics.
AgodiniR.HarrisB. (2010). An experimental evaluation of four elementary school math curricula. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3, 199–253.
2.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.RobertsG.VaughnS.PfannenstielK. H.PorterfieldJ.GerstenR. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23.
3.
ButterworthB.LaurillardD. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: Identification and intervention. ZDM, 42, 527–539. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0267-4
4.
ChardD. J.JungjohannK. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for success in mathematics learning, intersection: Mathematics education sharing common grounds. Houston, TX: Exxon-Mobil Foundation.
5.
ClarkeB.DoablerC. T.FienH.BakerS. K.SmolkowskiK. (2011). Project ROOTS: A randomized control trial of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
6.
ClarkeB.DoablerC. T.SmolkowskiK.KostyD. B.BakerS. K.FienH.Strand CaryM. (2014). Examining the efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219414538514
7.
CoddingR. S.BurnsM. K.LukitoG. (2011). Meta-analysis of mathematic basic-fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(1), 36–47.
8.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
9.
CoyneM. D.Kame’enuiE. J.CarnineD. W. (2011). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
DavisK.JungjohannK. (2009). Early learning in mathematics: Level K. Unpublished curriculum, University of Oregon, Center on Teaching and Learning, Eugene, OR.
11.
DoablerC. T.NelsonN. J.KostyD. B.FienH.BakerS. K.SmolkowskiK.ClarkeB. (2014). Examining teachers’ use of evidence-based practices during core mathematics instruction. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(2), 99–111. doi:10.1177/1534508413511848
12.
DysonN. I.JordanN. C.GluttingJ. (2011). A number sense intervention for low-income kindergartners at risk for mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. doi:10.1177/0022219411410233
13.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
14.
FuchsL. S.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.CirinoP. T.FletcherJ. M.FuchsD.HamlettC. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction, with and without deliberate practice, on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 89–100.
15.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203.
16.
GerstenR. M.ChardD.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242.
17.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC.HariaP.LehJ.AdamsA.KaduvetoorA. (2007). A comparison of single and multiple strategy instruction on third grade students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 115–127.
18.
JosephL. M.KonradM.CatesG.VajcnerT.EveleighE.FishleyK. M. (2012). A meta-analytic review of the Cover-Copy-Compare and variations of this self-management procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 49(2), 122–136.
19.
KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial & Special Education, 24, 97–114. doi:10.1177/07419325030240020501
20.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 306–321. doi:10.1177/0022219408331037
21.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The Nation’s Report Card: A first look. 2013 mathematics and reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
22.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. doi:10.3102/0013189X08329195
23.
National Research Council. (2005). How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (DonovanM. S.BransfordJ. D., Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24.
PoncyB. C.SkinnerC. H.O’MaraT. (2006). Detect, practice, and repair: The effects of a classwide intervention on elementary students’ math-fact fluency. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 7, 47–68.
25.
PowellS. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 94–108.
26.
SmithP. L.RaganT. L. (1993). Instructional design. New York, NY: Merrill.
