Tier 2 supplemental instruction within a response to intervention framework provides a unique opportunity for developing partnerships between speech-language pathologists and classroom teachers. Speech-language pathologists may participate in Tier 2 instruction via a consultative or collaborative service delivery model depending on district needs. This article describes steps and suggestions for the development and implementation of a collaborative Tier 2 program for kindergarten.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2002). A workload analysis approach for establishing caseload standards in the schools (Guidelines, ASHA Desk Reference, Vol. 3). Rockville, MD: Author.
2.
CastlesA.ColtheartM. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?Cognition, 91, 77–111.
3.
ConsoliniM.CarsonL.MillerS.JohnstonR. (2009, November). Survey of SLPs: RtI process in Georgia public schools. Paper presented at the American Speech Language and Hearing Association Convention, New Orleans.
4.
CowleyJ. (1999). Dan goes home. Bothell, WA: The Wright Group.
5.
EhrenB. J. (2000). Maintaining a therapeutic focus and sharing responsibility for student success: Keys to in-classroom speech-language services. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 252–264.
6.
EhrenB.MontgomeryJ.RudebuschJ.WhitmireK. (2007). Responsiveness to intervention: New roles for speech-language pathologists. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org
7.
FriendM.CookL.Hurley-ChamberlainD.ShambergerC. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 9–27.
8.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93–99.
HarnW.BradshawM.OgletreeB. (1999). Speech-language intervention in schools: Issues in service delivery. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 163–169.
11.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
12.
JusticeL. M. (2006). Evidence-based practice, response-to-intervention, and the prevention of reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 284–297.
13.
KjeldsenA.NiemiP.OlofssonA. (2003). Training phonological awareness in kindergarten level children: Consistency is more important than quantity. Learning and Instruction, 13, 349–365.
14.
KoutsoftasA.HarmonM.GrayS. (2009). The effect of Tier 2 intervention for phonemic awareness in a response-to-intervention model in low-income preschool classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearings Services in Schools, 40, 116–130.
15.
LeeS.LeeT. (2005). Please puppy please. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
MooreB.MontgomeryJ. (2008). Making a difference for America’s children: Speech-language pathologists in public schools. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
17.
Moore-BrownB. (1991). Moving in the direction of change: Thoughts for administrators and speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearings Services in Schools, 22, 148–149.
18.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00–4754). Retrieved from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/upload/report.pdf
19.
PaulR. (2007). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence (3rd ed.). London: Mosby.
20.
ReutebuchC. (2008). Succeed with a response-to-intervention model. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 126–128.
21.
SchetzK.BillingsleyB. (1992). Speech-language pathologists’ perceptions of administrative support and non-support. Language, Speech, and Hearings Services in Schools, 23, 153–158.
22.
SchueleM.BoudreauD. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention: Beyond the basics. Language, Speech, and Hearings Services in Schools, 39, 3–20.
23.
UkrainetzT. (2006). The implications of RtI and EBP for SLPs: Commentary on L.M. Justice. Language, Speech, and Hearings Services in Schools, 37, 298–303.
24.
UkrainetzT.RossK.HarmH. (2009). An investigation of treatment scheduling for phonemic awareness with kindergarteners who are at risk for reading difficulties. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 86–100.
25.
WiigE.SecordW.SemelE. (2004). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-preschool-2. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
