AldemanC.CareyK.DillonE.MillerB.SilvaE. (2011). A measured approach to improving teacher preparation (Policy brief). Washington, DC: Education Sector.
2.
BallD. L.CohenD. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL.SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2012). The BABC. Retrieved from http://www.bacb.com/
4.
Center for American Progress, U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for a Competitive Workforce, & Hess, F. M. (2009). Leaders and laggards: A state by state report card on educational innovation. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
5.
CoggshallJ. G.BivonaL.ReschlyD. J. (2012). Evaluating the effectiveness of teacher preparation programs for support and accountability (Research and policy brief). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
6.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2012). The Council for Exceptional Children’s position on special education teacher evaluation. Arlington, VA: Author.
7.
Data Quality Campaign. (2012). Fact sheet. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
FlodenR. E. (2012). Teacher value added as a measure of program quality: Interpret with caution. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(5), 356–360. doi: 10.1177/0022487112454175
9.
GansleK. A.NoellG. H.BurnsJ. M. (2012). Do student achievement outcomes differ across teacher preparation programs? An analysis of teacher education in Louisiana. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(3), 304–317.
10.
GoldhaberD. (2010). When the stakes are high, can we rely on value-added? Exploring the use of value-added models to inform teacher workforce decisions. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
11.
GrossmanP. (2011). A framework for teaching practice: A brief history of an idea. Teachers College Record, 113(12), 2836–2843.
12.
HanushekE. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other Investigations of class size effects, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 143–163.
13.
International Dyslexia Association. (2012). International Dyslexia Association recognizes nine universities for meeting teacher training standards in reading: Teachers who are better prepared lesson the impact of reading difficulties (Press release). Retrieved from http://www.interdys.org/UniversityReview.htm
14.
KoedelC.ParsonsE.PodgurskyM.EhlertM. (2012). Teacher preparation programs and teacher quality: Are there real differences across programs? (CALDER Working Paper No. 79). Columbia: University of Missouri, Department of Economics.
15.
LevineA. (2006). Educating school teachers. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
16.
MoatsL. (2012, June). What the CCSS are, and what they are not. New Times for DLD, 30(2), 1–2, 5.
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12882
19.
NoellG.KowalskiP. (2010). Using longitudinal data systems to inform state teacher quality efforts (Policy brief). Washington, DC: Partnership for Teacher Quality.
20.
SandersW.HornS. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVASS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(3), 247–256.