BryantB. R.BryantD. P.GerstenR.ScammaccaN. N.FunkWinterA.. . . PoolC. (2008). The effects of tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), 47–63.
2.
FuchsL. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33, 188–192.
3.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L.SeethalerP. M. (2007). Mathematics screening and progress monitoring at first grade: Implications for responsiveness-to-intervention. Exceptional Children, 73, 311–331. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.0022710.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00227
4.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
5.
LembkeE. S.FoegenA.WhittakerT. A.HamptonD. (2008). Establishing technically adequate measures of progress in early numeracy. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 207–215. doi:10.1177/153450840731347910.1177/1534508407313479
6.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
