Algebra is a gateway to expanded opportunities, but it often poses difficulty for students with learning disabilities. Consequently, it is essential to identify evidence-based instructional strategies for these students. The authors begin by identifying three areas of algebra difficulty experienced by students with disabilities: cognitive processes, content foundations, and algebra concepts. The authors next describe three evidence-based strategies for addressing these needs: classwide peer-tutoring, cognitive strategy instruction, and explicit instructional routines.
Allsopp, J.H. ( 1997). Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 367-379.
2.
American Diploma Project Network. (2009). Closing the expectations gap: Fourth annual 50-state progress report on the alignment of high school policies with the demands of college and careers . New York: Achieve Inc.
3.
Booth, L. ( 1984). Algebra: Children’s strategies and errors. A report of strategies and errors in secondary mathematics project. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
4.
Bulgren, J.A., Lenz, B.K., & Schumaker, J.B. (2002). The use and effectiveness of a comparison routine in diverse secondary content classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 356-371.
5.
Bulgren, J.A., & Schumaker, J.B. (2006). Teaching practices that optimize instructional access. In D. D. Deshler & J. B. Schumaker (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with disabilities: Accessing the general education curriculum (pp. 79-120). New York: Corwin.
6.
Calhoon, M.B., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2003). The effects of peer-assisted learning strategies and curriculum-based measurement on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 235-245.
7.
Cawley, J.F., & Miller, J.H. ( 1989). Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: Are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 250-254, 259.
8.
Fennell, F. ( 2008). What algebra? When? Retrieved May 2009 from National Council of Teachers of Mathematics website : http://www.nctm.org/news/detail.aspx?id=13840
9.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. ( 2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. Journal of Special Education, 39, 34-44.
10.
Gagnon, J.C., & Maccini, P. ( 2001). Preparing students with disabilities for algebra. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 8-15.
11.
Gagnon, J.C., & Maccini, P. ( 2007). Teacher reported use of empirically validated and standards-based instructional approaches in secondary mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 43-57.
12.
Geary, D.D. ( 2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4-15.
13.
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. ( 2009). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context. (NCES 2001-001). U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
14.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. ( 2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323-334). New York: Guilford Press.
15.
Hart, K.M. ( 1984). Ratio: Children’s strategies and errors. A report of strategies and errors in secondary school mathematics project. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
16.
Hutchinson, N.L. ( 1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 35-63.
17.
Kamps, D.M., Greenwood, C., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Veerkamp, M.B., Utley, C., Tapia, Y., . . . Bannister, H. ( 2008). The efficacy of classwide peer tutoring in middle schools . Education and Treatment of Children, 31, 119-152.
18.
Kerslake, D. ( 1986). Algebra: Children’s strategies and errors. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
19.
Kunsch, C.A., Jitendra, A.K., Sood, S. ( 2007). The effects of peer-mediated mathematics instruction for students with disabilities: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22(1), 1-12.
20.
Lenz, B.K., Adams, G.L., Bulgren, J.A., Pouliot, N., & Laraux, M. ( 2007). Effects of curriculum maps and guiding questions on the test performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 235-244.
21.
Lenz, B.K., & Deshler, D.D. ( 2004). Adolescents with learning disabilities: Revisiting "the educator’s enigma." In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 535-564). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Maccini, P., & Hughes, C.A. ( 1997). Mathematics interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 12, 168-176.
23.
Maccini, P., Mulcahy, C.A., & Wilson, M.G. ( 2007). A follow-up of mathematics interventions for secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 58-74.
24.
McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. ( 2007). Promises and limitations of peer-assisted learning strategies in reading. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal , 5, 97-112.
25.
Miles, D.D., & Forcht, J.P. ( 1995). Mathematics strategies for secondary students with learning disabilities or mathematics deficiencies: A cognitive approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 91-96.
26.
Miller, S.P., & Hudson, P.J. ( 2007). Using evidence-based practices to build mathematics competence related to conceptual, procedural, and declarative knowledge. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 47-57.
27.
Miller, S.P., & Mercer, C.D. ( 1997). Educational aspects of mathematics disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 47-56.
28.
Montague, M., Applegate, B., & Marquard, K. ( 1993). Cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 223-232.
29.
Montague, M., & Dietz, S. ( 2009). Evaluating the evidence base for cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem solving. Exceptional Children, 75, 285-302.
30.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
31.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008 ). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
32.
Scheuermann, A.M., Deshler, D.D., & Schumaker, J.B. (2009). The effects of the explicit inquiry routine on the performance of students with learning disabilities on one-variable equations. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 103-120.
33.
Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D. ( 1992). Validation of learning strategy intervention research for students with LD: Results of a programmatic research effort. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp. 22-46). New York: Springer-Verlag.
34.
Stecker, P.M., Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. ( 2005). Using curriculum-based measurements to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools , 42, 795-819.
35.
Swanson, H.L. ( 1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: An meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
36.
Wong, B.Y.L., Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Butler, D.L. ( 2003). Cognitive strategies instruction research in learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383-402). New York: Guilford Press.
