Ahearn, E. ( 2002). Due process hearings: 2001 update. Alexandria, VA: Project FORUM, National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
2.
Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. Murphy, 548 U.S. 291 (2006).
3.
Bateman, B.D., & Linden, M.A. ( 2006). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educational useful programs (4th ed.). Verona, WN: Attainment.
4.
Brookshire, R., & Klotz, J. ( 2002). Selected teachers’ perceptions of special education laws. Lantham, MD: Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) Processing and Reference Facility. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED476384).
5.
Boe, E.E., Bobbitt, S.A., Cook, L.H., Whitener, S.D., & Weber, A.L. ( 1997). Why didst thou go? Predictors of retention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers from a national perspective . The Journal of Special Education, 30, 390-411.
6.
Burlington School Comm. v. Mass. Dept. of Ed., 471 U.S. 359 (1985).
7.
Caruso, D. ( 2005). Bargaining and distribution in special education. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, 14, 171.
8.
Chambers, J.G., Harr, J.J., & Dhanani, A. ( 2003). What are we spending on procedural safeguards in special education, 1999-2000?Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, Center for Special Education Finance.
9.
Dagley, D. ( 1995). Enforcing compliance with IDEA: Dispute resolution and appropriate relief. Preventing School Failure, 39, 27-32.
10.
Davidson, D.N., & Algozzine, B. ( 2002). Administrators’ perceptions of special education law. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 15, 43-48.
11.
deBettencourt, L.U. ( 2002). Understanding the differences between IDEA and Section 504. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 16-23.
12.
Drasgow, E., Yell, M.L., & Robinson, T.R. (2001). Developing legally correct and educationally appropriate IEPs. Remedial and Special Education , 22, 359-373.
13.
Friend, M., & Cook, L. ( 2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
Gartin, B., Murdick, N., Thompson, J., & Dyches, T. ( 2002). Issues and challenges facing educators who advocate for students with disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 3-13.
15.
Getty, L.A., & Summy, S.E. ( 2004). The course of due process. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 40-44.
16.
Goldberg, S.S., & Kuriloff, P.J. (1991). Evaluating the fairness of special education hearings. Exceptional Children, 57, 546-555.
17.
Havey, J.M. ( 1999). School psychologists’ involvement in special education due process hearings. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 117-123.
18.
Hendrick Hudson Dist. Bd. of Ed v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
19.
Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305 (1988).
20.
Idstein, P. ( 1996). Swimming against the mainstream. American Educator, 19, 28-31.
21.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 468 U.S. 883, 104 S. Ct. 3371 (1984).
22.
Katsiyannis, A., Yell, M.L., & Bradley, R. ( 2001). Reflections on the 25th anniversary of the individuals with disabilities education act. Remedial and Special Education , 22, 324-334.
23.
Lombardi, T.P., & Ludlow, B.L. ( 2004). A short guide to special education due process. Phi Delta Kappa Fastbacks, 523, 7-48.
24.
Margolis, H. ( 1998). Avoiding special education due process hearings: Lessons from the field. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation , 9, 233-260.
25.
Mayerson, G. ( 2004). How to compromise with your school district without compromising your child: A field guide for getting effective services for children with special needs. New York: DRL Books .
26.
Meinhold, P.M., Mulick, J.A., & Teodoro, J.M. ( 1994). Risks and cost of a treatment litigation: Focus on the family. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 3, 389-401.
27.
Miller, K.J., & Connolly, M.J. (2003). Educators of the deaf and hard-of-hearing involved in due process hearings: Lessons learned. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24, 205-210.
28.
Mills, G.E., & Duff-Mallams, K. (1999). A mediation strategy for special education disputes. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35, 87-92.
29.
Newcomer, J.R., & Zirkel, P.A. ( 1999). An analysis of judicial outcomes of special education cases. Exceptional Children, 65, 469-480.
30.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.
31.
O’Shea, D.J., Bateman, D., Algozzine, B., & O’Shea L.L. (2004). The special education due process handbook. Longmont, CO: Sopris West Educational Services.
32.
Rickey, K. ( 2003). Special education due process hearings: Student characteristics, issues, and decisions. Journal of Disability Policy Studies , 14, 46-53.
33.
Schaeffer v. Weast, 128 S.Ct. 528, 537 (2005).
34.
Scheffel, D.L., Rude, H.A., & Bole, P.T. ( 2005). Avoiding special education litigation in rural school districts. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24, 3-8.
35.
Sellars, S. ( 2001). Texas education agency special education mediation scores high marks in survey of participants. Texas Education Today , 14 (3), 3.
36.
Smith, T.E.C. ( 2005). IDEA 2004: Another round in the reauthorization process . Remedial and Special Education, 26, 314-319.
37.
U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Study of personnel needs in special education. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
U.S. Department of Education. (2005). Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
39.
Vittelo, S. ( 1990). The efficacy of mediation in the resolution of parent-school special education disputes (Report from Rutgers: A working paper series). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers State University.
40.
Wakeman, S., Browder, D., Flowers, C., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2006). Principals’ knowledge of fundamental and current issues in special education. NASSP Bulletin, 90, 153-174.
41.
Weisharr, M. ( 1997). Legal principals important in the preparation of teachers: Making inclusion work. Clearing House, 70, 261-264.
42.
Winkelman v. Parma City School District No. 05-3886 (6th Cir. Nov. 4, 2005).
43.
Yell, M. ( 2006). The law and special education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
44.
Yell, M., & Katsiyannis, A. (2001). Legal issues. Promises and challenges in education law: 25 years of legal developments. Preventing School Failure, 45, 82-88.
45.
Yell, M.L., Shriner, J.G., & Katsiyannis, A. (2006). Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act Of 2004 and IDEA regulations of 2006: Implications for educators, administrators, and teacher trainers. Focus on Exceptional Children, 39, 1-24.
46.
Zirkel, P.A. ( 1994). Over-due process revisions for the individuals with disabilities education act. Montana Law Review, 42, 236-251.