Cooper, H. (1996). Speaking power to truth: Reflections of an educational researcher after 4 years of school board service. Educational Researcher, 25(91), 29-34.
2.
Deno, S.L. (2002). Problem solving as "best practice." In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (Vol. 1, pp. 37-56). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
3.
Elbaum, B.E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Moody, S.W. (2000). How effective are one-on-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605-619.
4.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2001). Responsiveness to intervention: A blueprint for practitioners, policymakers, and parents. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 57-61.
5.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93-99.
6.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness to instruction: Specifying measure and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(4), 216-227.
7.
Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 157-171.
8.
Gerston, R., & Dimino, J. (2006). RTI (response to intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 99-108.
9.
Graner, P.S., Faggella-Luby, M.N., & Fritschmann, N.S. (2005). An overview of responsiveness to intervention. What practitioners ought to know. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(2), 93-105.
10.
Harris-Murri, N., King, K., & Rostenberg, D. (2006). Reducing disproportionate minority representation in special education programs for students with emotional disturbances: Toward a culturally responsive response to intervention model . Education and Treatment of Children, 29(4), 779-799.
11.
Klingner, J.K., & Edwards, P.A. (2006). Cultural considerations with response to intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 108-117.
12.
Learning Disabilities Association of America. ( 2006). Position paper of the Learning Disabilities Association of America. Pittsburgh, PA: Author .
13.
Lyon, G.R., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz, B.A., Torgeson, J.K., Wood, F., et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In C. E. Finn Jr., A. J. Rotherham, & C. R. Hokanson Jr. (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259-287). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
14.
Marston, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in response to intervention: Prevention outcomes and learning disabilities identification patterns. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 539-544.
15.
Marston, D., Muyskens, P., Lau, M., & Canter, A. (2002). Problem solving model for decision-making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 187-200.
16.
McLesky, J., & Waldron, N.L. (2004). Three conceptions of teacher learning: Exploring the relationship between knowledge and the practice of teaching. Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children , 27(4), 3-14.
17.
Mellard, D. (2004). Understanding responsiveness to intervention in learning disabilities determination. Retrieved February 14, 2007, from http://www.nrcld.org/org/html/information
18.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Available from http://www.nasdse.org
19.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities : Available from http://www.ldonine.org/njcld
20.
No Child Left Behind, 42 U.S.C. 9401 (2001).
21.
O'Connor, R.E., Harty, K.R., & Fulmer, D. (2005). Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 532-538.
22.
Reschly. D. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 515-510.
23.
Stanovich, K.E. (1997). Progress in understanding reading. New York: Guilford.
24.
Tilly, W.D., Reschly, D.J., & Grimes, J. (1999). Disability determination in problem-solving systems. Conceptual foundations and critical components. In D. Reschly, W. D., Tilly, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition: Functional assessment and noncategorical programming (pp. 285-321). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
25.
U.S. Department of Education.Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA). Retrieved December 4, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/idea/idea2004.html.
26.
Vaughn, S. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for response to intervention to achieve acceptable prevention outcomes?Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
27.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 137-146.
28.
Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 140-147.
29.
Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/ learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 391-409.
30.
Vaughn Gross Center for Reading and Language Arts at the University of Texas at Austin. (2005). Introduction to the 3-tier reading model: Reducing reading difficulties for kindergarten through third grade students (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Author.
31.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S.G., & Fanuele, D. (2003, December). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between reading disabled and non-disabled children: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first grade intervention. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.