Peer-mediated instruction holds particular promise as an effective educational strategy for children with learning disabilities. When properly implemented, peer-mediated instructional approaches permit active engagement, frequent opportunities to respond, immediate error correction, prompt feedback on the correctness of responses, and motivational elements. They promote the integration and acceptance of children with disabilities. Here, research on 3 peer-mediated instructional approaches shown to be effective in promoting the academic achievement of children with learning disabilities is described. Guidelines for implementation, research findings, and practical considerations for success are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armendariz, F., & Umbreit, J. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 152—158.
2.
Bickel, W.W., & Bickel, D.D. (1986). Effective schools, classrooms, and instruction: Implications for special education. Exceptional Children, 52, 489—500.
3.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp.328—375). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Cavanaugh, R.A., Heward, W.L., & Donelson, F. (1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 403—406.
Englert, S. (1992). Defining and redefining instructional practice in special education: Perspectives on good teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15(2), 62—86.
7.
Friman, P.C. (2006). The future of applied behavior analysis is under the dome. Association for Behavior Analysis InternationalNewsletter, 29(3), 4—5.
8.
Gardner, R., III, Heward, W.L., & Grossi, T.A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63—71.
9.
Greenwood, C., Maheady, L., & Carta, J. (2002). Classwide peer tutoring programs. In M. Shinn, H. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventive and remedial approaches (pp. 611—649). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
10.
Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Hart, B., Kamps, D., Terry, B., Arreaga-Mayer, C., et al. (1992). Out of the laboratory and into the community: 26 years of applied behavior analysis at the Juniper Gardens Children's Project . The American Psychologist, 47, 1464—1474.
11.
Harper, G.F., Maheady, L., Mallette, B., & Sacca, M. (1992). Classwide Student Tutoring Teams: Instructor's manual. Fredonia: State University of New York at Fredonia.
12.
Harper, G.F., Mallette, B., Maheady, L., Bentley, A., & Moore, J. (1995). Retention and treatment failure in classwide peer tutoring: Implications for further research. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 5, 399—414.
13.
Harper, G.F., Mallette, B., Maheady, L., & Brennan, G. (1993). Classwide Student Tutoring Teams and Direct Instruction as a combined instructional program to teach generalizable strategies for mathematics word problems. Education & Treatment of Children , 16, 115— 134.
14.
Heward, W.L., Gardner, R., IiiR.A., Cavanaugh, F.H., Courson, T.A., Grossi, & Barbetta , P.M. (1996). Everyone participates in this class: Using response cards to increase active student response. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28(2), 4—10.
15.
Howe, K. (1992). Liberal democracy, equal educational opportunity, and the challenge of multiculturalism. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 455—470.
16.
Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning (7th ed.). San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers.
17.
Kame'enui, E.J., & Simmons, D.C. (1990). Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
18.
Lovitt, T.C. (1992). TRIP: Translating research into practice; teaching strategies. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
19.
Lovitt, T.C., & Horton, S.V. (1987). How to develop study guides. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 3, 333—343.
20.
Maheady, L., Harper, G.F., & Mallette, B. (2000). Peer-mediated interventions and students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22(1), 12—55.
21.
Maheady, L., Mallette, B., Harper, G.F., & Sacca, K. (1991). Heads Together: A peer-mediated option for improving the academic achievement of heterogeneous learning groups. Remedial and Special Education, 12(2), 25—33.
22.
Maheady, L., Michielli-Pendl, J., Harper, G.F., & Mallette, B. (2006). The effects of Numbered Heads Together with and without an incentive package on the science test performance of a diverse group of sixth graders. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 15, 24—38.
23.
Maheady, L., Michielli-Pendl, J., Mallette, B., & Harper, G.F. (2002). A collaborative research project to improve the academic performance of a diverse sixth grade science classroom. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(1), 55—70.
24.
Maheady, L., Sacca, M.K., & Harper, G.F. (1987). Classwide Student Tutoring Teams: Effects on the academic performance of secondary students. The Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 107—121.
25.
Narayan, J.S., Heward, W.L., Gardner, R., IiiF.H., Courson, , & Omness , C. (1990). Using response cards to increase student participation in an elementary classroom . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 23, 483—490.
26.
Péladeau, N., Forget, J., & Gagné, F. (2003). Effect of paced and un-paced practice on skill application and retention: How much is enough?American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 769—801.
27.
Reitz, A. (1994). Implementing comprehensive classroom-based programs for students with emotional and behavioral problems. Education & Treatment of Children, 17(3), 312—331.
28.
Rindfuss, J.B., Al-Attrash, M., Morrison, H., & Heward, W.L. (1998). Using guided notes and response cards to improve quiz and exam scores in an eighth grade American history class. Orlando, FL: Association for Behavior Analysis.
29.
Slavin, R.E. (1986). Using student team learning (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
Slavin, R.E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
