In this article, the author gives an overview of learning strategy instruction and describes how to implement this evidenced-based practice in classroom and whole-school settings. He also discusses this information as it relates to the provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Crowley, K., & Siegler, R.S. (1999). Explanation and generalization in children's strategy learning. Child Development, 70, 304—316.
2.
Ellis, E.S., Lenz, B.K., & Sabornie, E. (1987). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part I: Critical agents. Journal ofRemedial and Special Education, 8, 6—20.
3.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L., Williams, J.P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension to students learning disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279—320.
4.
Lenz, B. K., & Deshler, D. D. (Eds.). (2004). Teaching content to all: Inclusive teaching in grades 4—12. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Lenz, B.K., Ehren, B.J., & Deshler, D.D. (2005). The content literacy continuum: A school reform framework for improving adolescent literacy for all students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(6), 60— 63.
6.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1997). Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities, 1976 to 1996. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 197—214.
7.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate meta-cognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta & G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of child development (Vol. 4, pp. 89—129). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & O'Sullivan, J.T. (1984). Memory strategy instruction is made of this: Metamemory and durable strategy use. Educational Psychologist, 19, 94—107.
9.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & O'Sullivan, J.T. (1985). Children's metamemory and the teaching of strategies. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley , G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (pp. 111—153). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Pressley, M., Borkowski, J.G., & Schneider, W. (1989). Good information processing: What it is and what education can do to promote it. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 866—878.
11.
Pressley, M., Forrest-Pressley, D., Elliott-Faust, D.L., & Miller, G.E. (1985). Children's use of cognitive strategies, how to teach strategies, and what to do if they can't be taught. In M. Pressley & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children (pp. 1—47). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Pressley, M., & Hilden, K.R. (in press). Cognitive strategies: Production deficiencies and successful strategy instruction everywhere. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), W. Damon & R. Lerner (Series Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13.
Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade-4/5 classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159— 191.
14.
Schumaker, J.B., Deshler, D.D., & Nolan, S.R. (1984). The paraphrasing strategy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Center for Research on Learning.
15.
Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2003). Self-regulation and learning . In W. M. Reynolds, G. E. Miller (General Eds.), & I. B. Weiner (Editor-in-Chief), Handbook of psychology: Volume 7. Educational psychology (pp. 59—78), New York: Wiley.
16.
Swanson, H.L. (2001). Reading intervention research outcomes and students with learning disabilities: What are the major instructional ingredients for successful outcomes? Perspectives, 27(2), 18—20.
17.
Taylor, B.M., Pearson, P.D., Clark, K., & Walpole, S. (2000). Effective schools and accomplished teachers: Lessons about primary-grade reading instruction in low-income schools. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 121—165.
18.
Wehmeyer, M.L., Lance, G.D., & Bashinski, S. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multi-level model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223—234.
