This article presents recent findings from several long-term qualitative investigations of co-teaching in science and social studies content-area classes, in which collaborating teachers and students with and without disabilities were observed and interviewed regarding effective practices and challenges associated with inclusion. In some sites, collaborating teachers were provided with research-based effective strategies and materials for including students with disabilities in specific activities. Results were equivocal in that in some cases, collaboration was extremely effective and conducive for promoting success for students with disabilities in inclusive classes. In others, challenges remained that presented barriers for successful collaboration and inclusion for students with disabilities. Important mediating variables were identified as academic content knowledge, high-stakes testing, and co-teacher compatibility. Findings are discussed with respect to both successes and remaining challenges.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, J.M. (1995). Inclusion in Virginia: Educational experiences of students with learning disabilities in one elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 116—123.
2.
Boudah, D., Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1997). Collaborative instruction: Is it an effective option for inclusion in secondary classrooms?Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 293—316.
3.
Friend, M. (2000). Perspective: Myths and misunderstandings about professional collaboration. Remedial and Special Education , 21, 130—132.
4.
Hardy, S.D. (2001). A qualitative study of the instructional behaviors and practices of a dyad of educators in self-contained and inclusive co-taught secondary biology classrooms during a nine week science instruction grading period. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 4731A. (UMI No. 3000278)
5.
LeCompte, M.D., & Preissle, J.P. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic.
6.
Magiera, K. (2002). Co-teaching in middle school classrooms: Does the instructional experience differ for students with disabilities in co-taught and solo taught classes? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
7.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2004). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
8.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (in press). Effective classroom instruction. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology . Oxford, UK: Elsevier .
9.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Mantzicopoulos, P., Sturgeon, A., Goodwin, L., & Chung, S. (1998). A place where living things affect and depend on each other. Qualitative and quantitative outcomes associated with inclusive science teaching. Science Education, 82, 163—179.
10.
Murawski, W.W., & Swanson, H.L. (2001). A meta-analysis of co-teaching research: Where are the data?Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 258—267.
11.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1995). Qualitative research methodology in the study of learning and behavioral disorders: An analysis of recent research . In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 9, pp. 249— 272). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
12.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Graetz, J. (2003, April). Effects of classwide peer tutoring on learning in inclusive high school chemistry classes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Chicago, IL.
13.
Trent, S.C. (1998). False starts and other dilemmas of a secondary general education collaborative teacher: A case study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 503—513.
14.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). To assure the free appropriate public education of all children with disabilities: Twenty-third annual report to Congress on the implementation of The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
15.
Walther-Thomas, C.S., & Carter, K.L. (1993). Cooperative teaching: Helping students with disabilities succeed in mainstream classrooms. Middle School Journal, 25, 33—38.
16.
Weichel, W. (2001). An analysis of student outcomes on co-taught settings in comparison to other special education service delivery options for students with learning disabilities. Dissertation Abstracts International , 62 (07), 2386. (UMI No. 3021407)
17.
Weiss, M.P., & Brigham, F.J. (2000). Co-teaching and the model of shared responsibility: What does the research support? In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (vol. 14, pp. 217—245). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
18.
Weiss, M.P., & Lloyd, J.W. (2002). Congruence between roles and actions of secondary special educators in co-taught and special education settings. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 58—68.
19.
Zigmond, N., & Magiera, K. (2001). Current practice alerts: A focus on co-teaching: Use with caution. Alerts, 6, 1—4.
20.
Zigmond, N., & Matta, D.W. (2004). Value added of the special education teacher in secondary school co-taught classes. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Secondary interventions: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 17, pp. 57—78). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science/ JAI.
