Anonymous. (2003). Educational research in the No Child Left Behind environment: NCTM Research Advisory Committee . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 185—190.
2.
Arhar, J.M. (2003). “No Child Left Behind” and middle level education: A look at research, policy, and practice. Middle School Journal, 34(5), 46—51.
3.
Ananda, S. (2003). Achieving alignment. Leadership , 33(1), 18—21, 37.
4.
Brady, R.C. (2003). The challenge of interventions: Can failing schools be fixed?State Education Standard, 4(2), 16—22.
5.
Borman, G.D. (2003). How can Title I improve achievement?Educational Leadership, 60(4), 49—53.
6.
Bracey, G.W. (2003). The 13th Bracey Report on the condition of public education. Phi Delta Kappan,85(2), 148—164.
7.
Bromberg, M., & Gordon, M. (2000). 1100 words you need to know (4th ed.). New York: Barron's Educational Series.
8.
Brownell, M.T., Sindelar, P.T., Bishop, A.G., Langley, L.K., & Seo, S. (2002). Special education teacher supply and teacher quality: The problems, the solutions. Focus onExceptional Children , 35(2), 1—16.
9.
Brownstein, R. (2003). Locked down. Education Next, 3(3), 40—46.
10.
Christie, K. (2003). One goal, different AYPs. Phi Delta Kappan,84(6), 422, 471.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2002). Research and rhetoric on teacher certification: A response to “teacher certification reconsidered.” Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(36), 1—34.
12.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2003). Keeping good teachers: Why it matters, what leaders can do. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 6—13.
13.
Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R., & Frelow, F. (2002). Variation in teacher preparation: How well do different pathways prepare teachers to teach. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(4), 286—302.
14.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us?Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13—25.
15.
Elliott, J.L. (2003). IDEA 2003: Reauthorization or retrofit?School Administrator, 60(3), 28—30.
16.
Garcia, C. (2003). A superintendent's commentary: Issues of collective collaboration between special education, general education, Title I programs, and bilingual education within the context of the No Child Left Behind Act . Journal of Special Education Leadership, 16(1), 52—54.
17.
Goertz, M., & Duffy, M. (2003). Mapping the landscape of high-stakes testing and accountability programs. Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 4—11.
18.
Gulek, C. (2003). Preparing for high-stakes testing. Theory Into Practice, 42(1), 42—50.
19.
Hardy, L. (2003). High goal, hard task. American School Board Journal, 190(9), 29—32.
20.
Hardy, L. (2003). The contrarian. American School Board Journal, 190(10), 20—23.
21.
Haycock, K. (2003). Toward a fair distribution of teacher talent. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 11—15.
22.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1989). Teachers and cultural styles in a pluralistic society. NEA Today, 7(6), 65—69.
23.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1990). Back to Binet: The case against the use of IQ tests in the schools. Contemporary Education, 61(4), 184—189.
24.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1991a). Do we have the will to educate all children?Educational Leadership, 49(1), 31—36.
25.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1991b). Why we must pluralize the curriculum . Educational Leadership, 49(4), 12—16.
26.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1992). Behavioral style, culture, and teaching and learning. Journal of Negro Education, 61(3), 370—377.
27.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1994). What good is this thing called intelligence and why bother to measure it?Journal of Black Psychology , 20(4), 430—444.
28.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1996). Maintaining the Montessori metaphor: What every child wants and needs. NAMTA Journal, 21(2), 108—125.
29.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1997). The structure of valid staff development . Journal of Staff Development, 18(2), 28—34.
30.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1998). To touch the spirit of the child: A multicultural perspective. NAMTA Journal, 23(1), 122—138.
31.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (1999). Colloquium on student achievement in multicultural school districts: Keynote address. Equity & Excellence in Education, 32(1), 79—86.
32.
Hilliard, A.G., III. (2000). Excellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 293—304.
33.
Hombo, C.M. (2003). NAEP and No Child Left Behind: Technical challenges and practical solutions. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 59—65.
34.
Imber, M. (2003). The latest chapter in reform. American School Board Journal, 190(4), 62—63, 70.
35.
Imber, M. (2003). Teach the student, not the test. American School Board Journal, 190(9), 60—62.
36.
Jacob, B. (2003). High stakes in Chicago. Education Next, 3(1), 66—72.
37.
Jennings, J. (2002). Knocking on your door. American School Board Journal, 189(9), 25—27.
38.
Kaplan, L.S., & Owings, W.A. (2003). The politics of teacher quality. Phi Delta Kappan,84(9), 687—692.
39.
Levin, B., & Wiens, J. (2003). There is another way: A different approach to education reform. Phi Delta Kappan,84(9), 658—664.
40.
Levine, D.U., Cooper, E.J., & Hilliard, A., III. (2000). National urban alliance professional development model for improving achievement in the context of effective schools research. Journal of Negro Education, 69(4), 305—322.
41.
Levine, E. (2003). The data trek. American School Board Journal, 190(9), 46—48.
42.
Lewis, A.C. (2003). Adult reading, rated G. Phi Delta Kappan,84(10), 723—724.
43.
Lewis, A.C. (2003). From universal access to universal proficiency . School Administrator, 60(8), 14—16, 18—20.
44.
Lewis, L.S. (2003). Will education reform create more opportunity?Society, 40(5), 57—61.
45.
Lipsky, D.K. (2003). The coexistence of high standards and inclusion . School Administrator, 60(3), 32—35.
46.
Mathis, W.J. (2003). No Child Left Behind: Costs and benefits. Phi Delta Kappan,84(9), 679—686.
47.
McLaughlin, M.J., & Thurlow, M. (2003). Educational accountability and students with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Educational Policy, 17(4), 431—451.
Ortiz, A.A. (1997). Learning disabilities occurring concomitantly with linguistic differences. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30(3), 321—332.
50.
Ortiz, A.A., & Wilkinson, C.Y. (1991). Assessment and intervention model for the bilingual exceptional student (AIM for the BESt). Teacher Education and Special Education, 14(1), 35—42.
51.
Ortiz, A.A., & Yates, J.R. (2001). A framework for serving English language learners with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Leadership , 14(2), 72—80.
52.
Osher, D., & Quinn, M.M. (2003). Policies matter: For students, for teachers, and for better outcomes. Preventing School Failure, 47(2), 52—58.
53.
Pine, G.J., & Hilliard, A.G. , III. (1990). Rx for racism: Imperatives for America's schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(8), 593—600.
54.
Ritter, G.W., & Lucas, C.J. (2003). Puzzled states. Education Next , 3(4), 54—61.
55.
Rose, L.C., & Gallup, A.M. (2003a). The 35th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan,85(1), 41—52.
56.
Rose, L.C., & Gallup, A.M. (2003b). Policy implications of the 35th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll. Phi Delta Kappan,85(1), 53—56.
57.
Rosen, K. (2003). It takes a district. Leadership , 33(1), 22—24.
58.
Rotherham, A.J. (2003). Hopes and hazards: No Child Left Behind and low-performing public schools. State Education Standard, 4(2), 30—35.
59.
Rothman, R., Slattery, J.B., Vranek, J.L., & Resnick, L.B. (2002). Benchmarking and alignment of standards and testing. CSE Technical Report. California University, Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Center for the Study of Evaluation (ED466642).
60.
Rudalevige, A. (2003). The politics of No Child Left Behind. Education Next, 3(4), 62—69.
61.
Sanders, T. (2003). Clearing the NCLB hurdle. American School Board Journal, 190(9), 26—28.
62.
Slavin, R.E. (2003). A reader's guide to scientifically based research . Educational Leadership, 60(5), 12—16.
63.
Strahan, D. (2003). General patterns and particular pictures: Lessons learned from reports from “beating the odds” schools. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(4), 296—305.
64.
Trahan, C. (2002). Implications of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 for teacher education. ERIC Digest. Washington, DC : ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education . ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477723.
65.
Tyler, C.E. (2003). NCLB: Tall order for small districts. Leadership, 33(1), 26—27.
66.
Williams, R.B. (2003). Voices: Will Indian education be left behind?Tribal College Journal, 15(1), 54—55.
67.
Yates, J.R., & Ortiz, A.A. (1991). Professional development needs of teachers who serve exceptional language minorities in today's schools. Teacher Education and Special Education, 14(1), 11—18.
68.
Yatvin, J., Weaver, C., & Garan, E. (2003). Reading First: Cautions and recommendations. Language Arts, 81(1), 28—33.
69.
Zimmermann, J., & Brown, C. (2003). Let them eat more than phonics. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(8), 603—605.
70.
CEC Public Policy Resources http://www.cec.sped.org/pp/resources.html
71.
Chicago Public Schools: No Child Left Behind http://nclb.cps.k12.il.us/
72.
Chicago Tribune on NCLB (May 22, 2004) http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/specials/ chi-030808nochild-storygallery,1,2367728.storygallery
73.
Education Commission of the States: NCLB http://nclb.ecs.org/nclb/
74.
Education Week (on the web): Quality Counts 2004: Count Me In: Special Education in an Era of Standardshttp://www.edweek.org/sreports/qc04/
75.
Houston's “Zero Dropout” by Michael Winerip: Rethinking Schools Online http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/ drop181.shtml
76.
Justice Talking (from NPR): No Child Left Behind http://www.justicetalking.org/viewprogram.asp?progID=428
77.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act: A Technical Assistance Resource (CEC Publication) http://www.cec.sped.org/pp/OverviewNCLB.pdf
78.
NoChildLeft.Com: A site advocating a sound approach to school improvement http://nochildleft.com/
79.
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory: No Child Left Behind: A collection of online resources http://www.ncrel.org/policy/curve/resource.htm
80.
Our Children Left Behind: IDEA Reauthorization http://www.ourchildrenleftbehind.com/pages/1/index.htm
81.
P.L. 107-110, No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ED.gov) (link to the complete Act) http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
82.
Rethinking Schools Online: Bush's No Child Left Behind http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/ index.shtml
83.
State of California. No Child Left Behind Webpage http://www.cde.ca.gov/nclb/
84.
State of Illinois. No Child Left Behind Webpage http://www.isbe.state.il.us/nclb/default.htm
85.
State of North Carolina. No Child Left Behind Webpage http://www.ncpublicschools.org/nclb/
86.
State of Texas. No Child Left Behind Webpage http://www.tea.state.tx.us/nclb/
87.
U.S. Department of Education No Child Left Behind Web Site www.nochildleftbehind.gov
88.
U.S. Department of Education (ED.gov): No Child Left Behind http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=pb
89.
U.S. Department of Education. Parents' Tool Box www.nclb.gov/parents/index.html
90.
U.S. Department of Education. State Information Page www.nclb.gov/next/states/index.html
91.
U.S. House of Representatives, Education and the Workforce Committee. Fact Sheet: Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: A Progress Report http://edworkforce.house.gov/issues/108th/education/nclb/ progress.htm
92.
U.S. House of Representatives, Education and the Workforce Committee. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, H.R. 1 http://edworkforce.house.gov/issues/107th/education/nclb/ nclb.htm
