The Individualized Educational Program (IEP) is the foundation of instruction for individuals with disabilities. Therefore, learning to write and attach meaning to these documents is critical for preservice teachers. This article explores an approach to teaching IEPs during teacher preparation, which encourages preservice teachers to view the IEP as a relevant, purposeful document; reflect on their own learning styles; and consider the impact of the IEP on the learner. Implications for using this approach in teacher education programs are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bauwens, J., & Korinek, L. (1993). IEPs for cooperative teaching: Developing legal and useful documents. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 303—306.
2.
Council for Exceptional Children. (1998). The international standards for the preparation and licensure of special educators (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.
3.
Drasgow, E., Yell, M.L., & Robinson, T.R. (2001). Developing legally correct and educationally appropriate IEPs. Remedial and Special Education , 22, 359—373.
4.
Edelen-Smith, P. (1995). Eight elements to guide goal determination for IEPs. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 297—301.
5.
Ensign, J. (1999, April). Weaving experiential education into a preservice special education course: The klutz experience. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Montreal, Canada.
6.
Hess, F.M., & Brigham, F.J. (2001). How federal special education policy affects schooling in Virginia. In M. A. Byrnes (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in special education (pp. 165—175). Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill-Dushkin.
7.
Huefner, D.S. (2000). The risks and opportunities of the IEP requirements under IDEA '97. The Journal of Special Education, 33(4), 195—204.
8.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (26)
9.
Menlove, R.R., Hudson, P.J., & Suter, D. (2001). A field of IEP dreams: Increasing general education teacher participation in the IEP development process. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(5), 28— 33.
Paul, J.L., Churton, M., Morse, W.C., Duchnowski, A.J., Epanchin, B., Osnes, P.G., et al. (1997). Special education practice: Applying the knowledge, affirming the values, and creating the future. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
12.
Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Bricker, D. (2000). Enhancing the quality of individualized education plan (IEP) goals and objectives. Journal of Early Intervention , 23(2), 92—105.
13.
Shriner, J.G., & Destefano, L. (2003). Participation and accommodation in state assessment: The role of individualized education programs. Exceptional Children, 69(2), 147—161.
14.
Smith, S.W. (1990). Individualized education programs (IEPs) in special education—From intent to acquiescence. Exceptional Children , 57, 6—14.
15.
Smith, S.W., & Brownell, M.T. (1995). Individuated education program: Considering the broad context of reform. Focus onExceptional Children, 28(1), 1—10.
16.
Werts, M.G., Mamlin, N., & Pogoloff, S.M. (2002). Knowing what to expect: Introducing preservice teachers to IEP meetings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25, 413—418.
