Too frequently, current approaches to discipline de-emphasize the importance of social, emotional, and behavioral instruction and overemphasize the use of punishment. When reactive, punitive consequences are the primary form of discipline, a negative school climate emerges. To prevent an unconstructive learning environment, educators need to teach students the knowledge, skills, and abilities that lead to the development of emotional competency. This article describes creative ways to use graphic organizers to effectively manage educational environments, build behavioral literacy in students, and create a learning community that celebrates diversity and empowerment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berube, M. S. (Ed.). (1993). The American heritage dictionary (2nd college ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Brooks, R. (1997). Teacher guide. Learning disabilities and self-esteem. Look what you've done! Stories of hope and resilience. Washington, DC: Greater Washington Educational Telecommunications Association.
4.
Bruce, M.A. (1995). Fostering resiliency in students: Positive action strategies for classroom teachers. Teacher Educator, 31(2), 178—188.
5.
Cancelli, A.S., Harris, A.M., Friedman, D.L., & Yoshida, R.K. (1993). Type of instruction and the relationship of classroom behavior to achievement among learning disabled children. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 28(1), 13—21.
6.
Chang, G.S.Y., & Lorenzi, P. (1983). The effects of participative versus assigned goal setting on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Management, 9(1), 55—64.
7.
Curry, L. (1984). Student commitment and school organization in relation to on-task behavior and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 9, 171—184.
8.
Ellis, E.S. (1998a). Makes sense accommodations: The LINCing routine . Tuscaloosa, AL: Masterminds, LLC .
9.
Ellis, E.S. (1998b). Makes sense accommodations: Phenomena mapping . Tuscaloosa, AL: Masterminds, LLC .
10.
Ellis, E.S. (2000). Makes sense accommodations: Strategic graphic organizer instruction. Tuscaloosa, AL: Masterminds, LLC.
Frederick, W.C. (1977). The use of classroom time in high schools above or below the median reading score. Urban Education, 21(4), 459—465.
13.
Gardner, H. (1993). Educating for understanding. American School Board Journal, 180(7), 20—24.
14.
Gordon, D. (1980). Rules and effectiveness of the hidden curriculum . Journal of Philosophy of Education, 17(2), 207—218.
15.
Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1995). Effects of goal setting and procedural facilitation on the revising behavior and writing performance of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 230—240.
16.
Grossi, T.A., & Heward, W.L. (1998). Using self-evaluation to improve productivity of trainees in a community-based restaurant training program. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities , 33(3), 321—326.
17.
Hannafin, M.J. ( 1981). Effects of teacher and student goal setting and evaluations on mathematics achievement and student attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 74(5), 321—326.
18.
Hlebowtitsh, P.S. (1994). The forgotten hidden curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(4), 339—349.
19.
Iran-Nejad, A., & Chissom, B.S. (1992). Contributions of active and dynamic self-regulation to learning. InnovativeHigher Education, 17(2), 125—137.
20.
Johnson, D.M. (1944). A modern account of problem-solving. Psychological Bulletin,41, 201—229.
21.
King, S.E. (1986). Inquiry into the hidden curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(1), 82—90.
22.
Levoie, R.D. (1994). Teacher's guide: Learning disabilities and social skills with Richard Levoie. Last one picked . . . first one picked on. Washington, DC: Richard D. Levoie and the Greater Washington Educational Telecommunications Association.
23.
Martella, R.C., Nelson, J.R., & Marchand-Martella, N.E. (2003). Managing disruptive behaviors in the schools: A school-wide, classroom, and individualized social learning approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
Martens, B.K., Hirallal, A.S., & Bradley, T.A. (1997). A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback. School Psychology Quarterly , 12(1), 33—41.
Miller, D.L., & Kelley, M.L. (1994). The use of goal setting and contingency contracting for improving children's homework. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 73—84.
27.
Morse, L.A. (1987). Working with young procrastinators: Elementary school students who do not complete school assignments. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 21(3), 221—228.
28.
Myles, B., & Simpson, R.L. (2001). Understanding the hidden curriculum: An essential social skill for children and youth with Asperger syndrome. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(5), 279—286.
29.
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1989). Instructional discourse and student engagement . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED319780)
Peterson, R. (1992). Life in a crowded place: Making learning a community . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32.
Pocock, A., Lambros, S., Karvonen, M., Test, D.W., Algozzine, B., & Martin, J.E. (2002). Successful strategies for promoting self-advocacy among students with LD: The LEAD group. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(4), 209—216.
33.
Portelli, J.P. (1993). Exposing the hidden curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(4), 343—358.
34.
Principato, F.R. (1983). Effect of goal setting with feedback on productivity in a sheltered workshop. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 18(2), 141—144.
35.
Quigney, T.A., & Studer, J.R. (1999).Using solution-focused intervention for behavioral problems in an inclusive classroom. American Secondary Education , 28(1), 10—18.
36.
Rasing, E.J., & Duker, P.C. (1992). Effects of multifaceted training procedure on the acquisition and generalization of social behaviors in language-disabled deaf children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(3), 723—734.
37.
Raskind, M.H., Goldberg, R.J., Higgins, E.L., & Herman, K.L. (2002). Teaching “life success” to students with LD: Lessons learned from a 20-year study. Intervention in School and Clinic, 37(4), 201—208.
38.
Research Connections. (1997). School-wide behavioral management systems: A promising practice for safer schools. Research Connections in SpecialEducation, 1(1), 1—8.
39.
Robinson, F.P. (1961). Effective study. New York: Harper & Row.
40.
Schapiro, S.R., & Livingston, J.A. (2000). Dynamic self-regulation: The driving force behind academic achievement. InnovativeHigher Education, 25(1), 23—35.
41.
Schunk, D.H., & Gaa, J.P. (1981). Goal setting influence on learning and self-evaluation. TheJournal of Classroom Interaction, 16(2), 38—44.
42.
Tollefson, N., Tracy, D.B., Johnsen, E.P., & Chatman, J. (1986). Teaching learning disabled students goal-implementation skills. Psychology in the Schools, 23(2), 194—204.
43.
Trammel, D.L., & Schloss, P.J. (1994). Using self-recording, evaluation, and graphing to increase completion of homework assignments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(2), 75—81.
44.
Vallacher, R.R., & Wegner, D.M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3—15.
45.
Wehmeyer, M.L., & Schwartz, M. (1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3—12.
46.
Wickert, D.M. (1987). Increasing attendance via a school attendance review board. Rural Educator, 8(3), 16—19.
