Understanding vocabulary words and how they relate to other ideas and concepts is a critical subskill that influences reading comprehension. Students with deficient vocabularies are likely to have difficulty comprehending written material. This article provides teachers of middle and high school students with empirically validated strategies and recommended activities for vocabulary instruction. Specifically, we discuss teaching vocabulary through drama, semantic mapping, video technology, the Keyword Method, and active student responding activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson-Inman, L., & Ditson, L. (1999). Computer-based concept mapping: A tool for negotiating meaning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26, 6-13.
2.
Anderson-Inman, L., Knox-Quinn, C., & Horney, M.A. (1996). Computer-based study strategies for students with learning disabilities: Individual differences associated with adoption level . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 461-484.
3.
Atkinson, R.C. (1975). Mnemotechnics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821-828.
4.
Avila, E., & Sadowski, M. (1996). Exploring new applications of the keyword method to acquire English vocabulary. Language Learning, 46, 379-395.
5.
Birch, J., & Hatfield, P. (1995). Direct teaching of multisensory language structure . In C. McIntyre & J. Pickering (Eds.), Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education: For students with dyslexia and related disorders (pp. 44-53). Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
6.
Boning, R. (1978). World theatre: Starring the students. New York: Barnell Loft.
7.
Bos, C., & Anders, P. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31-42.
8.
Casale, V., & Manzo, A. (1982). Differential effects of cognitive, affective, and proprioceptive instructional approaches on vocabulary acquisition. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 222 879)
9.
Cavenaugh, R.A., Heward, W.L., & Donelson, F. (1996). Effects of response cards during lesson closure on the academic performance of secondary students in an earth science course . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 403-406.
10.
Cook, D. (1989). Strategic learning in the content areas. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction .
11.
Duffelmeyer, F. (1980). The influence of experience-based vocabulary instruction on learning word meaning. Journal of Reading, 24, 35-40.
12.
Ellis, E. (1992). LINCS: A starter strategy for vocabulary learning . Lawrence, KS: Edge.
13.
Fulk, B.J.M., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1992). Mnemonic generalization training with learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 7, 2-10.
14.
Gardner, R., III, Heward, W.L., & Grossi, T.A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: A systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63-71.
15.
Goldsworthy, C. (1996). Developmental reading disabilities: A language based treatment approach. San Diego: Singular.
16.
Guillory, H.G. (1998). The effects of keyword captions to authentic French video on learner comprehension. CALICO Journal, 15, 89-108.
17.
Gumpel, T.P., & Frank, R. (1999). An expansion of the peer-tutoring paradigm: Cross-age peer tutoring of social skills among socially rejected boys. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 115-118.
18.
Heward, W.L. (1994). Three "low-tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner III, D. Sainato , J. O. Cooper, T E. Heron, W L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Monterey, CA: Brookes-Cole.
19.
Heward, W.L., Gardner, R., III, Cavanaugh, R.A., Courson, E.H., Grossi, T.A., & Barbetta, P.M. (1996). Everyone participates in this class. Teaching Exceptional Children, 28, 4-10.
20.
Hughes, C.A. (1996). Memory and test-taking strategies. In D. D. Deshler, E. S. Ellis, & B. K. Lenz (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
21.
Inspiration Software, Inc. (1998). Portland, OR.
22.
King-Sears, M.E., Mercer, C.D., & Sindelar, P.T. (1992). Towards independence with keyword mnemonics: A strategy for science vocabulary instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 22-23.
23.
Lawson, M.J., & Hogben, D. (1998). Learning and recall of foreign-language vocabulary: Effects of keyword strategy for immediate and delayed recall. Learning and Instruction, 8, 179-194.
24.
Lerner, J. (1997). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Fulk, B.J.M. (1990). Teaching abstract vocabulary with the keyword method: Effects on recall and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 92-96.
27.
McCormick, S. (1999). Instructing students who have literacy problems . Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28.
Miller, A.D., Barbetta, P.M., & Heron, T.E. (1994). START tutoring: Designing, training, implementing, adapting, and evaluating tutoring programs for school and home settings. In R. GardnerIII, D. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T E. Heron, W L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 265-282). Monterey, CA: Brookes-Cole.
29.
Moore, D., & Readance, J. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal ofeducation Research, 78, 11-17.
30.
Mortweet, S.L., Utley, C.A., Walker, D., Dawson, H.L., Delquadri, J.C., Reddy, S.S., Greenwood, C.R., Hamilton, S., & Ledford, D. (1999). Classwide peer tutoring: Teaching students with mild mental retardation in inclusive classrooms. Exceptional Children, 65, 524-536.
31.
Ranger, L. (1995). Improving reading comprehension through a multifaceted approach utilizing drama. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 758)
32.
Richardson, S. (1995). Specific developmental dyslexia: retrospective and prospective views: The history of learning disabilities. In C. McIntyre & J. Pickering (Eds.), Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education: For students with dyslexia and related disorders (pp. 1-15). Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
33.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1992). Classroom applications of mnemonic instruction: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization. Exceptional Children, 58, 219-229.
34.
Taba, H. (1967). Teacher's handbook for elementary social studies . Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
35.
Tam, B.K.Y., & Scott, M.L. (1996). Three group instructional strategies for students with limited English proficiency. Journal for Vocational Special NeedsEducation, 19, 31-36.
36.
Wood, K., & Algozzine, B. (1994). Teaching reading to high-risk learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37.
Xin, R., Glaser, C., & Rieth, H. (1996). Multimedia reading: Using anchored instruction and video technology in vocabulary lessons. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29, 46-50.
