Ager, A. (1986). Performance contoured programming: A structure for microcomputer-based teaching of individuals with severe learning difficulties. Journal of the Association from ProgrammedLearning, 23(2), 130-135.
2.
Armstrong, L., Yang-Dori, J., & Cuneo, A. (1994). The learning revolution: Technology is reshaping education. Business, 3360, 80-88.
3.
Char, C. (1990). Interactive technology and the young child: Insights from research and design. In Center for learning technology reports and papers in progress (Report No. 90-2). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 335 152)
4.
Forcier, R. (1999). The computer as an educational tool for productivity and problems solving (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Higgins, K., Boone, R., & Williams, D.L. (1999, April). Educational software for students with disabilities: The importance of formative evaluation. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
7.
Larsen, S. (1995). What is "quality" in the use of technology for children with learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly , 18(2), 118-130.
8.
Lee, W.W. (1987). Microcomputer courseware production and evaluation guidelines for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(7), 436-438.
9.
Lewis, R.B. (1993). Special education technology: Classroom applications . Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
10.
Lockard, J., Abrams, P.D., & Many, W.A. (1997). Microcomputers for twenty-first century educators . New York: Longman.
11.
Lovely, G. (1996). Teacher's home computer. Instructor , 106(1), 100-103.
12.
MACRO Systems, Inc. (1988). Improving the instructional design and use of general software for practical application with handicapped students. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Special Education Programs.
13.
Neuman, D. (1991). Learning disabled students' interactions with commercial courseware: A naturalistic study. Educational Technology, Research, and Development, 39(1), 31-49.
14.
Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.
15.
Pastor, E., & Kerns, E. (1997). A digital snapshot of an early childhood classroom . Educational Leadership, 55(3), 42-45.
16.
Perkins, D. (1995). Software goes to school: Teaching understanding with new technologies. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Singer, B. (1983). How do teacher and student evaluations of CAI software compare?The Computing Teacher, 11(3), 34-36.
18.
Truett, C. (1984). Field testing educational software: Are publishers making the effort?Educational Technology, 24(5), 7-12.
19.
Williams, D.L., Boone, R., & Heflich, D. (2000). Teacher beliefs about educational software: A Delphi study. Manuscript in preparation.
20.
Zane, T., & Frazer, C.G. (1992). The extent to which software developers validate their claims. Journal of Research on Computing in Education , 24(3), 410-419.