This article describes the planning phase and first year implementation of a doctoral cohort program for urban principals that is a collaborative effort of the Department of Educational Administration at Texas A&M University and the Austin Independent School District. The guiding vision, organization, and curriculum of the program are discussed, as well as the involvement of multiple other contributing groups and individuals. Recommendations are offered for other universities and/or school districts considering similar collaborative doctoral programs focused on the improvement of urban schooling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonG. L., HerrK., and NihlenA. S. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator's guide to qualitative practitioner research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BlankR. K. (1987). The role of the principal as leader: Analysis of variation in leadership of urban high schools. The Journal of Educational Research, 81(2), 69–80.
3.
BlissJ. R. (1993). Building open climates in urban schools. In ForsythP. B., and TallericoM. (Eds.), City schools: Leading the way (pp. 131–145). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
4.
CibulkaJ. G. (1992). Urban education as a field of study: Problems of knowledge and power. In CibulkaJ. G., ReedR. J., and WongK. K. (Eds.), The politics of urban education in the United States: The 1991 yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 27–44). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
5.
ComerJ. P. (1987). New Haven's school-community connection. Educational Leadership, 44(6), 13–16.
6.
EdmondsR. R. (October 1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15–27.
7.
FirestoneW. A., and WilsonB. L. (1985). Using bureaucratic and cultural linkages to improve instruction: The principal's contribution. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(2), 7–30.
8.
ForsythP. B. (1993). Motivating urban children to learn. In ForsythP. B., and TallericoM. (Eds.), City schools: Leading the way (pp. ix–xv). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
9.
ForsythP. B., and TallericoM. (1993). Preface. In ForsythP. B., and TallericoM. (Eds.), City schools: Leading the way (pp. 64–96). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
GoodladJ. I., and OakesJ. (1988). We must offer equal access to knowledge. Educational Leadership, 45(5), 16–22.
12.
GoreJ. M. (1998). Disciplining bodies: On the continuity of power relations in pedagogy. In PopkewitzT. S., and BrennanM. (Eds.), Foucault's challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 231–254). New York: Teacher's College Press.
13.
JohnsonJ. A., DupuisV. L., MusialD., HallG. E., and GollnickD. M. (1996). Introduction to the foundations of American education (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
14.
LomoteyK. L. (1989). African American principals: School leadership and success.New York: Greenwood Press.
15.
LomoteyK. L. (Ed.) (1997). Sailing against the wind: African Americans and women in U.S. education.Albany: SUNY.
16.
SchonD. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
ShirleyD. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform.Austin: University of Texas Press.
18.
TruebaH. T. (1991). From failure to success: The roles of culture and cultural conflict in the academic achievement of Chicano students. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Research and policy agendas for the 1990s (pp. 151–163). London: Falmer Press.
19.
ValenciaR. R. (1991). The plight of Chicano students: An overview of schooling conditions and outcomes. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Research and policy agendas for the 1990s (pp. 3–26). London: Falmer Press.
20.
WalkerA., and StottK. (1993). Preparing for leadership in schools: The mentoring contribution. In CaldwellB. J., and CarterE. M. A. (Eds.), The return of the mentor: Strategies for workplace learning (pp. 77–90). London: Falmer Press.
21.
ZellnerL. J., and ErlandsonD. A. (1997). Leadership laboratories: Professional development for the 21st century. NASSP Bulletin, 81(585), 45–50.