This paper describes an innovative, highly collaborative administrator preparation program specifically designed to prepare leaders for schools in the new millennium. Building upon and extending best practices in administrator preparation programs, the paper describes how a research university and a large urban school system came together to jointly develop and implement a preparation program to meet the needs of urban schools. After discussing the specifics of the program, the paper examines barriers to collaboration and details lessons learned through the collaborative process. The paper concludes with an assessment of the likelihood for reforming administrator preparation programs in light of institutional barriers to collaboration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchillesC. M. (1998). How long?The AASA Professor, 22(1), 9–11.
2.
BarnettB. G. (1990). School–university collaboration: A fad or the future of administrator preparation?Planning and Changing, 21(3), 146–157.
3.
BassG. R. (1990). The practitioner's role in preparing successful school administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 74(529), 27–30.
4.
BrentB. O., and HallerE. J. (1998). Who really benefits from graduate training in educational administration? Prompting the debate. The AASA Professor, 22(1), 1–7.
5.
CooperB. S., and MuthR. (1994). Internal and external barriers to change in departments of educational administration. In MulkeenT. A., Cambron-McCabeN. H., and AndersonB. J. (Eds.), Democratic leadership: The changing context of administrative preparation (pp. 61–81). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
6.
CostaA. L., and KallickB. (Eds.) (1995). Assessment in the learning organization: Shifting the paradigm.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
7.
CottrillD. (1994). Internships: Learning the most from the best in the least amount of time. NASSP Bulletin, 78(559), 72–76.
8.
DareshJ. C. (1997). Improving principal preparation: A review of common strategies. NASSP Bulletin, 81(585), 3–8.
9.
DembowskiF. L. (1998). What should we do now? Suggested directions for school administration programs. The AASA Professor, 22(1), 19–22.
10.
DePreeM. (1997). Leading without power.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
DonmoyerR., ImberM., and ScheurichJ. J. (Eds.) (1995). The knowledge base in educational administration.Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
GoodladJ. I. (1987). Linking schools and universities: Symbolic partnerships.Seattle, WA: Center for Educational Renewal.
13.
HoyleJ. R., EnglishF. W., and SteffyB. E. (1998). Skills for successful 21st century school leaders.Arlington, VA: American Association for School Administrators.
14.
JacobsonS. L. (1998). Preparing educational leaders: A basis for partnership. In JacobsonS. L., EmihovichC., HelfrichJ., PetrieH. G., and StevensonR. B. (Eds.), Transforming schools and schools of education (pp. 71–97). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15.
JacobsonS. L. (1990). Reflections on the third wave of reform: Rethinking administrator preparation. In JacobsonS. L., and ConwayJ. A. (Eds.), Educational leadership in an age of reform (pp. 30–44). New York: Longman.
16.
KatzM. (1991). Putting the holistic educational leadership puzzle together. Planning and Changing, 22(1), 13–22.
17.
KellerB. (1998). Principals’ shoes are hard to fill, study finds. Education Week, 17(27), 3.
18.
McCownC. H., EakinC. J., and DusenberyK. (1997). Developing urban school leaders. Journal of Staff Development, 18(3), 16–19.
19.
McDanielR., FurtwenglerW. J., and FurtwenglerC. B. (1999). Doctoral preparation programs in educational administration: The status of reform in four midwestern universities. Journal of School Leadership, 9(1), 26–50.
20.
MilsteinM. M. (1990). Rethinking the clinical aspects of preparation programs: From theory to practice. In JacobsonS. L., and ConwayJ. A. (Eds.), Educational leadership in an age of reform (pp. 119–130). New York: Longman.
21.
New Visions for Public Schools. (1999). Crisis in leadership: Finding and keeping educational leaders for New York City's public schools.New York: Author.
22.
PetrieH. G. (1998). From “my work” to “our work”. In JacobsonS. L., EmihovichC., HelfrichJ., PetrieH. G., and StevensonR. B. (Eds.), Transforming schools and schools of education (pp. 23–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23.
ReavisC. A. (1990). Utilizing curriculum, classroom practice, culture, and climate. NASSP Bulletin, 74(529), 39–43.
24.
ScheurichJ. J. (1995). The knowledge base in educational administration: Post-positivist reflections. In DonmoyerR., ImberM., and ScheurichJ. J. (Eds.), The knowledge base in educational administration (pp. 17–31). Albany: State University of New York Press.
25.
SchneiderJ. (1998). University training of school leaders isn't the only option. The AASA Professor, 22(1), 7–8.
26.
ScribnerJ. P., and BredesonP. V. (1997). Beyond simulations and case studies: Improving leader preparation through action research. Journal of School Leadership, 7(3), 230–245.
27.
SengeP. (1990). The fifth discipline.Doubleday: New York.
28.
University Council for Educational Administration. (1987). Leaders for America's schools: The report of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration.Tempe, AZ: Author.
