The purpose of this study was to investigate teacher empowerment in high schools that had a school council over varying lengths of time (either zero, one, two, or three years). Teachers in this study were in a state that mandated a school governance process to involve teachers in the decision-making process. A School Participant Empowerment Scale (SPES) was used to measure empowerment and it contained the following six subscales: decision making, autonomy, self-efficacy, professional growth, status, and impact.
Each teacher received a packet containing a demographic form, the School Participant Empowerment Scale (six scales), and a self-addressed, stamped envelope. The returned data were analyzed by a MANOVA technique resulting in a significant Wilkeslambda. A follow-up procedure (ANOVA) indicated that a significant difference existed on the decision-making scale between schools with no experience with councils and those with three years experience. There were no significant differences for the remaining subscales. These results are interpreted and implications for practitioners and policymakers are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association of School Administrators, National Association of Elementary School Principals, and National Association of Secondary School Principals.1988. School-Based Management. A Strategy for Better Learning, Alexandria, VA: NAESP Ed. Products Center.
2.
AshbyS.1989. Empowering Teachers: The Key to School-Based Reform, ERIC # 311004.
3.
BaileyW. J.1991. School-Site Management Applied.Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Co., Inc.
4.
BlaseJ., and BlaseJ. R.1994. Empowering Teachers: What Successful Principals Do.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
BolinF. S.1989. “Empowering Leadership,”Teachers College Record, 91(1): 81–96.
6.
BrandtR.1989. “On Teacher Empowerment: A Conversation with Ann Lieberman,”Educational Leadership, 46(8): 23–28.
7.
Casner-LottoJ.1988. “Expanding the Teaching Role: Hammond's School Improvement Process,”Phi Delta Kappan, 69: 349–353.
8.
ChengY. C.1996. School Effectiveness & School-Based Management: A Mechanism for Development.Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
9.
CollinsR. A., and HansonM. K.1991. School-Based Management/Shared Decision-Making Project 1987–1988 through 1989–1990. Summative Evaluation Report. Office of Educational Accountability, Dade County Public Schools, Miami, FL.
10.
ConleyS., and BacharachS.1990. “From School-Site Management to Participatory School-Site Management,”Phi Delta Kappan, 71(7): 539–544.
11.
CrosbyP. B.1988. The Eternally Successful Organization.New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
DavidJ.1989. “Synthesis of Research on School-Based Management,”Educational Leadership, 46(8): 45–53.
13.
FeignbaumA. V.1983. Total Quality Control.New York: McGraw-Hill.
14.
GoodladJ.1984. A Place Called School: Prospects for the Future.New York: McGraw-Hill Company.
15.
GomezJ.1989. “The Path to School-Based Management Isn't Smooth, but We're Scaling the Obstacles One by One,”The American School Board Journal, 176(10): 20–22.
16.
HusbandR. E.1994. “Teachers Perceived Levels of Empowerment in Departmental and Interdisciplinary Team Organized Middle Level Education Programs,” Unpublished dissertation, University Park, PA: Penn State University.
17.
IshikawaK.1985. What Is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
JohnsonM.1993. “Emergent Patterns of Leadership in a Shared Decision-Making School,” Unpublished dissertation, Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
19.
JuranJ. M.1988. Juran on Planning for Quality.New York: Free Press.
20.
LichtensteinG., McLaughlinM., and KnudsenJ.1991. Teacher Empowerment and Professional Knowledge. (Report Series RR-020). New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
21.
LightfootS. L.1986. “On Goodness of Schools: Themes of Empowerment,”Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3): 9–28.
22.
LindquistK. M., and MurielJ. J.1989. “School-Based Management: Doomed to Failure?”Education and Urban Society, 21: 403–416.
23.
LoganJ. P.1992. School Based Decision Making: First-Year Perceptions of Kentucky Teachers, Principals, and Counselors, Unpublished manuscript.
24.
LoveB. T.1994. “The Implementation of Project LEAD's Site-Based School Improvement and Teachers’ Perception of Participatory Management,” Unpublished dissertation, Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.
25.
LynnW. M.1993. “Differences in the Relationship Between Elementary School Teachers Participation in the Decision Making Process and Their Job Satisfaction in Regulated and Deregulated Schools in South Carolina,” Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, 1993 Dissertation Abstracts International, 53: 8.
MaeroffG. I.1988. “Teacher Empowerment: A Step toward Professionalization. A Bulletin Special,”NASSP-Bulletin, 72(511): 52–60.
28.
MalenB., OgawaR. T., and KranzJ.1989. “An Analysis of Site Based Management as an Education Reform Strategy,” paper sponsored by Focus Project, Graduate School of Education, the University of Utah, June.
29.
MalenB., OgawaR. T., and KranzJ.1989. “What Do We Know about School Based Management? A Case Study of the Literature—A Call for Research,” paper prepared for the Conference on Choice and Control in American Education, University of Wisconsin, May.
30.
MalenB., OgawaR. T., and KranzJ.1990. “Site-Based Management: Unfulfilled Promises,”The School Administrator; 47(2): 30–59.
31.
MarburgerC. L.1980. “Parents/Citizens: The Fourth Force in Education,”NASSP Bulletin, 64: 8–13.
32.
McIntireR. G., and FessendenJ. T.1994. The Self-Directed School: Empowering the Stakeholders, New York: Scholastic, Inc.
33.
McKenzieF. D.1989. “Implications and Rewards of Teacher Empowerment,” in Preparing Schools for the 1990's: An Essay Collection.New York: Metropolitan Life, pp. 1–6.
34.
National Commission on Excellence in Education.1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform.Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
35.
NealR. G.1988. “School-Based Management: An Advanced Model,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Negotiators and Contract Administrators, San Francisco, CA, November.
36.
OwensR. G.1995. Organizational Behavior in Education.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
37.
PetersT. J.1982. In Search of Excellence.New York: Harper and Row.
38.
PrawatR. S.1991. “Conversations with Self and Settings: A Framework for Thinking about Teacher Empowerment,”American Educational Research Journal, 28(4): 737–757.
39.
RinehartJ. S., and ShortP. M.1991. “Viewing Reading Recovery as a Restructuring Phenomenon,”Journal of School Leadership, 1: 379–399.
40.
SharpJoan C.1992. “Empowering Elementary Teachers: Are They Willing and Interested?” Unpublished dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.
41.
ShortP. M., and RinehartJ. S.1992. “School Participant Empowerment Scale: Assessment of Label of Empowerment within the School Environment,”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52: 951–960.
42.
ShortP. M., and GreerJ. T.1997. Leadership in Empowered Schools: Themes from Innovative Efforts, Columbus: Merrill Publishing.
43.
SmithD. L., ValeskyT. C., and HorganD. D.1991. “Impact of School-Based Decision-Making on School Climate,” paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
44.
TaguchiG.1986. Introduction to Quality Engineering, Dearborn, MI: American Supplier Institute.
45.
TeagueM. J.1991. “Teacher Satisfaction and Involvement in Decision Making Selected High Schools in Ohio,” Unpublished dissertation. Kent, OH: Kent State University.
46.
WeissC. H., CamboneJ., and WyethA.1991. Trouble in Paradise: Teacher Conflicts in Shared Decision Making, NCEL Occasional Paper No. 7, Nashville, TN: National Center for Educational Leadership, ERIC Document Reproduction Sources No. ED 332 346.
47.
WhiteP.1989. “An Overview of School-Based Management: What Does the Research Say?”NAASP Bulletin, 73(518): 1–8.
48.
WohlstetterP.1995. “Getting School-Based Management Right: What Works and What Doesn't,”Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1): 22–26.
49.
WohlstetterP., and BuffettT.1992. “Decentralizing Dollars under School-Based Management: Have Policies Changed?”Educational Policy, 6(1): 35–54.
50.
WoodG.1994. “Democratic Teacher Education: Programs, Processes, Problems, and Prospects,” in NovakJohn M. (ed.), Democratic Teacher Education: Programs, Processes, Problems, and Prospects, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 11–19.
