Abstract
Leadership preparation programs in eleven universities receiving grants from the Danforth Foundation were included in this study of preparation program effects and methods. Program graduates (N = 136) in administrative roles provided data about the value they attributed to characteristics of the programs which they had experienced. A sample of their teacher colleagues (N = 739) provided data about the nature and quality of leadership provided by the graduates in their schools. Results suggest that these programs made a significant contribution to leadership as actually practiced in schools, and that constructivist instructional strategies included in preparation programs accounted for much of this effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
