AllingtonR. L., and McGill-FranzenA.1992. “Unintended Effects of Educational Reform in New York,”Educational Policy, 6(4): 397–414.
2.
BarrR., and DreebenR.1983. How Schools Work.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BensonC. S.1991. “Definitions of Equity in School Finance in Texas, New Jersey, and Kentucky,”Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2): 401–422.
4.
BerneR., and StiefelL.1993. “Cutback Budgeting: The Long Term Consequences,”Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(4): 664–684.
5.
BrentB. O., and MonkD. H.1995. “The Distribution of Resources within New York State Public School Systems: A Microlevel Analysis.” Paper presented at The 1995 National Center for Educational Statistics Annual Data Conference, Arlington, VA.
6.
ClarkC.1993. “The Texas School Finance Melodrama.” Paper presented at The Annual Conference of the National Tax Association, St. Paul, MN.
7.
ColemanJ. S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,”American Journal of Sociology, 95: S95–S120.
8.
ColemanJ. S.1991. Parental Involvement in Education. (Order #065-000-00459-3). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.
9.
ComerJ. P.1980. School Power.New York: Free Press.
CooperB. S., and SarrelR.1991. “Managing for School Efficiency and Effectiveness: It Can Even Be Done in New York City,”National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 8(3): 4–17.
12.
Coopers & Lybrand L. L. P. & the Center for Workforce Preparation.1995. “The Finance Analysis Model.” (Available from Cooper & L. L. P. & the Center for Workforce Preparation, 203 North La Salle Street, Chicago, IL).
13.
Darling-HammondL.1992a. “Educational Indicators and Enlightened Policy,”Educational Policy, 6(3): 235–265.
14.
Darling-HammondL.1992b. “Creating Standards of Practice and Delivery for Learner-Centered Schools.” Paper prepared for The New York State Equity Study Group for Elementary, Middle, and Secondary Education.
15.
FischerM.1990. Fiscal Accountability in Milwaukee's Public Elementary Schools, Where Does the Money Go?Milwaukee, WI: Wisconsin Policy Research Institute.
16.
FoxJ. N.1987. “An Analysis of Classroom Spending: Or Where Do All the Dollars Go?”Planning and Changing, 18(3): 154–162.
17.
GamoranA.1987. “The Stratification of High School Learning Opportunities,”Sociology of Education, 6: 135–155.
18.
GamoranA.1993. “Alternative Uses of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: Can We Bring High-Quality Instruction to Low-Ability Classrooms?”American Journal of Education, 1: 1–22.
19.
HallinanM. T., and SorensenA. B.1985. “Class Size, Ability Group Size, and Student Achievement,”American Journal of Education, 94(1): 71–89.
20.
HanushekE. A.1979. “Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Education Production Functions,”Journal of Human Resources, 14(3): 351–388.
21.
HanushekE. A.1994. Making Schools Work: Improving Performance and Controlling Costs.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
22.
HanushekE. A., Gomes-NetoJ. B., and HarbisonR. W.1992. Self-Financing Educational Investments: The Quality Imperative in Developing Countries.Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
23.
HaywardG. C.1988. “The Two Million Dollar School.” (Policy Paper No. PP88-5-5). Berkeley, CA: Policy Analysis for California Education, University of California at Berkeley.
24.
HessG. A.Jr.1992. “Reorienting a School District's Funding Priorities by State Mandate.” Paper presented at The Annual Conference of the American Education Finance Association, New Orleans, LA.
25.
HessG. A.Jr., and MonfilettoT.1992. “Assessing and Correcting Intradistrict Funding Inequities.” Paper presented at The Annual Conference of the American Education Finance Association, New Orleans, LA.
26.
HoenackS. A.1988. “Incentives, Outcome-Based Instruction, and School Efficiency.” in Microlevel School Finance, MonkD. H., and UnderwoodJ., eds., Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 113–142.
27.
LankfordH., and WyckoffJ.1993. Putting Children First: Volume II: Where has the Money Gone?Albany, NY: New York State Special Commission on Educational Structure, Policies and Practices.
28.
LankfordH., and WyckoffJ.1995. “Where Has the Money Gone? An Analysis of School District Spending in New York,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(2): 195–218.
29.
LeeV. E., and BrykA. S.1988. “A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement,”Sociology of Education, 60: 172–192.
30.
LevinH. M.1989. “Financing the Education of At-Risk Students,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(1): 47–60.
31.
LevinH. M.1993. “The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Achieving Educational Equity.” in Outcome Equity in Education, BerneR., and PicusL., eds., Newbury Park, CA: pp. 167–190.
32.
MeyerR. H.1988. “Applied Versus Traditional Mathematics: New Econometric Models of the Contribution of High School Courses to Mathematics Proficiency.”Madison, WI: Discussion Paper from the Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin at Madison (October 1991).
33.
MonkD. H.1992. “Education Productivity Research: An Update and Assessment of Its Role in Education Finance Reform,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4): 307–332.
34.
MonkD. H.1994a. “Incorporating Outcome Equity Standards into Extant Systems of Educational Finance.” in New Conceptions of Equity in Educational Finance, BerneR., and PicusL., eds., Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, pp. 224–246.
35.
MonkD. H.1994b. “The Subject Area Preparation of Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers and Student Achievement,”Economics of Education Review, 13(2): 125–145.
36.
MonkD. H., and RoellkeC. F.1995a. “The Origin, Disposition, and Utilization of Resources within New York State Public School Systems: An Update.” Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Education Finance Association, Savannah, GA.
37.
MonkD. H., and RoellkeC. F.1995b. “What Education Dollars Buy: Evidence from New York.” Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
38.
MonkD. H., and HallerE. J.1993. “Predictors of High School Academic Course Offerings,”American Educational Research Journal, 30(1): 3–21.
39.
MonkD. H., and KingJ. A.1994. “Multilevel Teacher Resource Effects on Pupil Performance in Secondary Mathematics and Science: The Role of Teacher Subject Matter Preparation.” in Contemporary Policy Issues: Choices and Consequences in Education, EhrenbergR. G., ed., Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, pp. 29–58.
40.
OakesJ.1985. Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
OakesJ.1990. Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science.Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.
42.
OddenA., MonkD., NakibY., and PicusL.1995. “The Study of the Education Dollar: No Academy Awards and No Fiscal Smoking Guns,”Phi Delta Kappan, (October), pp. 161–168.
43.
PallasA.1988. “School Climate in American High Schools,”Teachers College Record, 89: 541–553.
44.
PicusL. O., and WattenbargerJ. L., eds. 1996. Where Does the Money Go? Resource Allocation in Elementary and Secondary Schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
45.
PorterA. C.1991. “Creating A System of School Process Indicators,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1): 13–30.
46.
Rodriguez, et al. vs. Los Angeles Unified School District, et al.1992. Consent Decree, No. C 611358, May 5.
47.
RoellkeC. R.1995. “The Allocation and Use of Human Resources in an Era of Reform: An Analysis of Staffing Patterns in Public K–12 Schooling Systems in New York State: 1983–1995.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
48.
RowanB., RaudenbushS. W., and KangS. J.1991. “Organizational Design in High Schools: A Multilevel Analysis,”American Journal of Education, 99(2): 238–270.
49.
RothsteinR., and MilesK. H.1995. Where's the Money Gone?Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
50.
ShavelsonR., McDonnellL., OakesJ., CareyN., and PicusL.1987. Indicator Systems for Monitoring Mathematics and Science Education. RAND, R–3570-NSF. August.
51.
ShermanJ. D.1984. Resource Allocation and Staffing Patterns in the Public Schools: 1959–1960 to 1983–1984.Washington, DC: Pelavin Associates, Inc.
52.
SlavinR. E., and MaddenN. A.1991. “Modifying Chapter 1 Program Improvement Guidelines to Reward Appropriate Practices,”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(4): 369–379.
53.
SlavinR., MaddenN. A., KarweitN. L., LivermonB. J., and DolanL. In Press. “Success for All: First-Year Outcomes of a Comprehensive Plan for Reforming Urban Education,”American Educational Research Journal.
54.
SpeakmanS. T., CooperB. S., SampieriR., MayJ., and HolsombackH.1995. “Where Did the $8 Billion Go?” Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
55.
StecherB. M.1992. Describing Secondary Curriculum in Mathematics and Science: Current Status and Future Indicators. (RAND N-3406-NSF). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.