In this paper, we examine the policy preferences of Tasmania's principals concerning accountability criteria and processes, compare their views to other stakeholder groups, and identify issues that warrant attention in principals’ professional development programs. We show that there are many criteria and processes related to the quality of learning, teaching, and leadership that are valued by all stakeholder groups, including principals. We conclude that Tasmanian state schools probably need to review and develop their accountability policies, and that the professional development will need to prepare leaders for specific forms of performance and generate key competencies if more educative forms of accountability practices are to be realised in practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisB.1993. “Establishment of a Review Unit,” circular memorandum to principals and teachers-in-charge of all schools and colleges, 29 March.
2.
Department of Education and the Arts.1984. Secondary Education and the FutureHobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
3.
Department of Education and the Arts.1991a. Our Children and the FutureHobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
4.
Department of Education and the Arts.1991b. Policy Statement: Staff Appraisal.Hobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
5.
Department of Education and the Arts.1991c. School and College Councils: Interim Guidelines.Hobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
6.
Department of Education and the Arts.1993a. Local School Leadership and Management.Hobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
7.
Department of Education and the Arts.1993b School Planning 1994.Hobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
8.
Department of Education and the Arts.1993c. School Resource PackageHobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
9.
Department of Education and the Arts.1993d. Framework for Curriculum Provision K-12.Hobart: Department of Education and the Arts.
10.
Department of Education and the Arts.1993e. Accountability Policy for the Division of Education.Hobart: Planning Branch, Department of Education and the Arts, August.
11.
DuignanP. A., and MacphersonR. J. S.1992. Educative Leadership: A Practical Guide for New Administrators and Managers, London: Falmer Press.
12.
EversC. W., and LakomskiG.1991. Knowing Educational Administration: Contemporary Methodological Controversies in Educational Administration Research.Oxford: Pergamon Press.
13.
GradyN., MacphersonR. J. S., MulfordW. R., and WilliamsonJ.1994. “Australian School Principals: Profile 1994,”Report to the Australian Principals Associations Professional Development Council, May, University of Tasmania: School of Education.
14.
Government of Tasmania.1981. Review of Tasmanian Government Administration. Report of Phase II of the Review.Chairman Sir George Cartland. Hobart: Government Printer.
15.
Government of Tasmania.1982. Review of Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Education Department.Report by Phillip Hughes. Hobart: Government Printer.
16.
HarringtonG.1992. “Educational Accountability Policies in Locally Managed Schools,” circular memorandum to principals of all high, district high and primary schools, senior officials, schools councils and parent's associations, 3 September.
17.
HockingH., and LangfordJ.1990. “Accountability and Quality: A School-Based Perspective,” in WyattT. J., and RubyA., Education Indicators for Quality, Accountability and Better Practice: Papers from the [Second] National Conference on Indicators and Quality of Education.Sydney: Australian Conference of Directors-General of Education, pp. 131–138.
18.
MacphersonR. J. S.1992. “History, Organisation and Power: A Preliminary Analysis of Educational Management in Tasmania,”School Organisation, 12(3): 269–288.
19.
MacphersonR. J. S.1995a. “Educative Accountability Policies for Tasmania's Locally-Managed Schools: Interim Research Findings,”International Journal of Educational Reform, in press.
20.
MacphersonR. J. S.1995b. “Accountability: Raising a Politically Incorrect Issue,”Educational Management and Administration, in press.
21.
MacphersonR. J. S.1995c. “Educative Accountability Policy Research: Methodology and Epistemology,”Educational Administrative Quarterly, in press.
22.
MacphersonR. J. S., and CaldwellB. J.1992. “The Skills and Attributes Required of Aspiring and Current Australian Primary and Secondary School Principals over the Next Decade: A Preliminary Analysis,” a stimulus paper commissioned by the Project on Leadership and Management Training for School Principals, a Commonwealth Project of National Significance managed by the Australian Secondary Principals’ Association.
23.
Tasmanian Education Council.1993. Report to the Minister for Education and the Arts on Reporting to Parents.Chairperson Roy Swain. Hobart: Tasmanian Education Council, September.
24.
WilsonS.1994. “Appropriate Forms of Accountability for Tasmanian State Schools: Teachers’ Perspectives,” unpublished Master of Education thesis, University of Tasmania, November.
