This paper reports the results of an exploratory investigation of the connections between principals’ leadership behaviors and teachers’ sense of efficacy in selected middle schools currently involved in building-level change efforts. Our findings indicate that there is a significant difference between general teaching efficacy (GTE) and personal teaching efficacy (PTE), the two dimensions that define the construct of teacher efficacy. When asked to interpret principals’ leadership behaviors, there was a significant difference between teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of principals’ leadership behaviors. Finally, the principal leadership behaviors most strongly related to GTE were models behavior, provides contingent rewards and inspires group purpose. Modeling behaviors and providing contingent rewards were also significantly related to PTE. Implications for further research, for principal preparation, and for administrative practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmorD., Conry-OsequeraP., CoxM., KinN., McDonnelL., PascalA., PaulyE., and ZellmanG.1976. Analysis of the School Preferred Reading Programs in Selected Los Angeles Minority Schools.Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
2.
AshtonP. T., and WebbR. B.1986. Teacher Efficacy and Student Achievement.New York: Longman.
3.
AshtonP.1984. “Teacher Efficacy: A Motivational Paradigm for Effective Teacher Education,”Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5): 28–32.
4.
AshtonP., WebbR., and DodaN.1983. “A Study of Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy,” final report, National Institute of Education Contract No. 400-79-0075, Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 231 834).
5.
AshtonP., BuhrD., and CrockerL.1984. “Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy: A Self- or Norm-Referenced Construct?”Florida Journal of Educational Research, 26(1): 29–41.
6.
BanduraA.1977. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,”Psychological Review, 84(2): 191–215.
7.
BanduraA.1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
8.
BermanP., McLaughlinM. W., BassG., PaulyE., and ZellmanG.1977. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change. Vol. VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation.Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
9.
BrookoverW., SchweitzerJ., SchneiderJ., BeadyC., FloodP., and WisenbakerJ.1978. “Elementary School Social Climate and School Achievement,”American Educational Research Journal, 15: 301–318.
10.
CampbellD., and FiskeD.1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multi-Method Matrix,”Psychological Bulletin, pp. 81–105.
11.
DemboM. H., and GibsonS.1985. “Teachers’ Sense of Efficacy: An Important Factor in School Improvement,”The Elementary School Journal, 86(2): 173–184.
12.
FullerB., WoodK., RapopartT., and DornsbuschS. M.1982. “The Organizational Context of Individual Efficacy,”Review of Educational Research, 52(1): 7–30.
13.
GibsonS., and DemboM.1984. “Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation,”Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4): 569–582.
14.
GuskeyT. R.1988. “Teacher Efficacy, Self Concept, and Attitudes toward the Implementation of Instructional Innovation,”Teaching Teacher Education, 4(1): 63–69.
15.
GuskeyT. R.1987. “Context Variables That Affect Measures of Tteacher Efficacy,”Journal of Educational Research, 81(1): 41–47.
16.
HoyW., and WoolfolkA.1993. “Tteachers’ Sense of Efficacy and the Organizational Health of Schools,”Elementary School Journal, 93(4): 355–372.
17.
LeithwoodK., JantziD., and FernandezA. April 1993. “Secondary School Teachers’ Commitment to Change: The Contributions of Transformational Leadership,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.
18.
LortieD. C.1975. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
LouisK. S., and SmithB.1991. “Tteacher Working Conditions,” in Teacher Commitment, Performance and Productivity, ReyesP., ed., CA: Sage Publications, pp. 23–47.
20.
McLaughlinM. W., and MarshD.1978. “Staff Development and School Change,”Teachers College Record, 80(1): 70–94.
McLaughlinM. W.1993. “What Matters Most in Teachers’ Workplace Context,” in Culture and Contexts of Teaching, LittleJ. W., and McLaughlinM. W., eds., New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 79–103.
23.
MidgleyC., FeldlauferH., and EcclesJ.1989. “Change in Teacher Efficacy and Student Self- and Task-Related Beliefs in Mathematics during the Transition to Junior High School,”Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2) 247–258.
24.
NewmannF. M., RutterR. A., and SmithM. S.1989. “Organizational Factors That Affect School Sense of Efficacy, Community, and Expectations,”Sociology of Education, 62(October): 221–238.
25.
RosenholtzS. J., BasslerO., and DempseyK. H.1986. “Organizational Conditions of Teacher Learning,”Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(2): 91–104.
26.
RosenholtzS. J.1985. “Effective Schools: Interpreting the Evidence,”American Journal of Education, 93: 352–388.
27.
RossJ. A.1993. “Research on Teacher Efficacy,”The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Trent Valley Centre.
28.
ScheinE. H.1985. Organizational Culture and LeadershipSan Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
SmylieM. A.1988. “The Enhancement Function of Staff Development: Organizational and Psychological Antecedents to Individual Teacher Change,”American Educational Research Journal, 25(1): 1–30.
30.
SteinM. K., and WangM.1988. “Teacher Development and School Improvement: The Process of Teacher Change,”Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2): 171–187.
31.
TarterJ. C., BlissJ. R., and HoyW. K.1989. “School Characteristics and Faculty Trust in Secondary Schools,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 3(August): 294–308.
