Communication is frequently identified as an essential aspect of leadership, an argument that is supported strongly by research regarding organizational change and leader effectiveness. This paper reviews that research and argues that this area of study should be formally addressed in preparation programs—for administrators and teachers. The paper also describes an on-going effort to develop communication skills as part of a university-based administrative preparation program that incorporates principles of experiential or problem-based learning and reflective practice.
ArgyrisC., and SchonD. A.1974. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BarnardC.1936. The Functions of the Executives.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
4.
BlumbergA., and GreenfieldW.1986. The Effective Principal.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
5.
BoltonR.1979. People Skills: How to Assert Yourself, Listen to Others, and Resolve Conflicts.NY: Simon & Schuster, Inc.
6.
BridgesE. M.1992. Problem Based Learning for Administrators.Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
7.
BrownJ. S., CollinsA., and DuguidP.1989. “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning,”Educational Researcher, 18(1): 32–42.
8.
DoyleM., and StrausD.1982. How to Make Meetings Work.NY: Jove Books.
9.
FullanM. G.1991. The New Meaning of Educational ChangeNY: Teachers College Press.
10.
GlaserS. R., and EblenA.1986. “Organizational Communication Effectiveness: The View of Corporate Administrators,”Journal of Applied Communication Research.14(2): 119–132.
11.
HallG. E.1988. “The Principal as Leader of the Change Facilitating Team,”Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22(1): 49–59.
12.
IsherwoodG. B.1983. Administrative Effectiveness in a Political Environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, CA.
13.
JacobsR. M.1993. “Road Maps to Understand School Communication,”Journal of Management Science, 5(2): 1–15.
14.
JonasR. S., and BlumbergA.1986. The Concept of Access in Supervisor-Teacher Relationships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
15.
LeithwoodK.1993. Contributions of Transformational Leadership to School Restructuring. An invited address to the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Association, Houston, TX.
16.
LeithwoodK. A., and JantziD.1990. Transformational Leadership: How Principals Can Help Reform School Cultures. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
17.
LeithwoodK. A., and StagerM.1989. “Expertise in Principals’ Problem Solving,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(2): 126–161.
18.
LeithwoodK. A., and SteinbachR.1992. “Improving the Problem-Solving Expertise of School Administrators: Theory and Practice,”Education and Urban Society, 24: 317–345.
19.
LeithwoodK. A., SteinbachR., and RaunT.1993. “Superintendents’ Group Problem-Solving Processes,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(3): 364–391.
20.
LymanL.1987. Principals and Teachers: Collaboration to Improve Instructional Supervision (Building Trust. Fostering Collaboration, Encouraging Collegiality). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Orlando, FL.
21.
MilesM. B.1993. “40 Years of Change in Schools: Some Personal Reflections,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(2): 213–248.
22.
MoyersB. D.1993. Healing and the Mind.NY: Doubleday.
23.
MurphyJ., HallingerP., and PetersonK. D.1986. The Administrative Control of Principals in Effective School Districts. ERIC ED 277 130.
24.
National Commission for the Principalship.1990. Principals for Our Changing Schools: Preparation and Certification.Fairfax, VA.
25.
National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration.1987. Leaders for America's Schools.Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
26.
National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education.1993. Proposed Curriculum Guidelines for Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (correspondence).
27.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration.1989. Improving the Preparation of School Administrators: An Agenda for Reform.Charlottesville, VA: Author.
28.
OstermanK. F.1994. “Feedback in School Settings: No News is Bad News,”Journal of Management Systems, (6): 2.
29.
OstermanK. F., and KottkampR. B.1993. Reflective Practice for Educators.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
30.
PrestineN. A., and LeGrandB. F.1991. “Cognitive Learning Theory and the Preparation of Educational Administrators: Implications for Practice and Policy,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(1): 61–89.
31.
RosenholtzS. J.1989. Teacher's Workplace: The Social Organization of Schools.NY: Longman.
32.
SagorR. D.1991. Operationalizing Transformational Leadership: The Behavior of Principals in Fostering Teacher Centered School Development. Paper presented at the annual conference of the University Council for Educational Administration, Baltimore, MD.
33.
SarasonS. B.1990. The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform: Can We Change Course Before It's Too Late?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
SengeP.1990. The Fifth DisciplineNY: Doubleday.
35.
Tucker-LaddP., MerchantB., and ThurstonP. W.1992. “School Leadership: Encouraging Leaders for Change,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3): 397–409.
