Efforts to restructure schools typically include broadening decisionmaking arenas to include teacher input. Principals, however, have not been prepared to share leadership roles with their faculties, nor have researchers examined the characteristics of principals who are willing and able to empower teachers.
Leader authenticity has been associated with more open climates in schools. In this study, the authors examined the relationship between principal authenticity and faculty empowerment in 30 high schools. One aspect of teacher empowerment—expanding teacher knowledge—was significantly related to leader authenticity. Implications for principal and teacher preparation programs as well as principal selection are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AluttoJ. A., and BelascoJ. A.1973. “Patterns of Teacher Participation in School System Decision Making,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 9: 27–41.
2.
ArendsR.1982. “The Meaning of Administrative Support,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4): 79–92.
3.
BacharachS. B., BambergerP., ConleyS. C., and BauerS.1990. “The Dimensionality of Decision Participation in Educational Organizations: The Value of a Multi-Domain Evaluation Approach,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 26: 126–167.
4.
BaileyW. J.1992. Power to the Schools: School Leader's Guide to Restructuring.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
BlumbergA., and GreenfieldW.1980. “Toward a Theory of Leading a School” in The Effective Principal: Perspectives on School Leadership.Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 229–249.
6.
BredesonP. V.1989. “Redefining Leadership and the Roles of School Principals: Response to Changes in the Professional Worklife of Teachers,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, March.
7.
BridgesE. M.1967. “A Model for Shared Decision Making in the School Principalship,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 3: 49–61.
8.
BrumbaughR. B.1971. “Authenticity and Theories of Administrative Behavior,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 16: 108–112.
9.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.1986. “A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century,” report of the Carnegie Task Force on teaching as a profession. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
Casner-LottoJ.1988. “Expanding the Teacher's Role: Hammond's School Improvement Process,”Phi Delta Kappan, 69: 349–353.
11.
CluneW. H., and WhiteP. A.1988. School-Based Management: Institutional Variation, Implementation, and Issues for Further Research.Madison, WI: Center for Policy Research in Education.
12.
ColbertR.1991. “Relationships among Teacher Perceptions of Principal Authenticity and Level of Faculty Empowerment Regarding Status, Access to Knowledge, and Access to Decision Making,” doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
13.
DavidJ. L.1989. “Synthesis of Research on School-Based Management,”Educational Leadership, 46(5): 45–53.
14.
DeBevoiseW.1984. “Synthesis of Research on the Principal as Instructional Leader,”Educational Leadership, 41(5): 14–20.
15.
ErlandsonD. A., and BifanoS. L.1987. “Teacher Empowerment: What Research Says to the Principal,”NASSP Bulletin, 71: 31–36.
16.
GarmsW. I., GuthrieJ. W., and PierceL. C.1978. School Finance: The Economics and Politics of Public Education.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
GlickmanC. D.1985. Supervision of Instruction: A Developmental Approach.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
HallingerP., and RichardsonD1988. “Models of Shared Leadership: Evolving Structures and Relationships,”Urban Review, 20: 229–245.
19.
HalpinA. W., and CroftD. B.1963. The Organizational Climate of Schools.Chicago: University of Chicago.
20.
HalpinA. W., and CroftD.B.1966. “The Organizational Climate of Schools,” in Theory and Research in Administration, HalpinA. W., ed., New York: Macmillan.
21.
HarrisonC. R., KillionJ. P., and MitchellJ. E.1989. “Site-Based Management: The Realities of Implementation,”Educational Leadership46(5): 55–58.
22.
HeckR. H., LarsenT. J., and MarcoulidesG. A.1990. “Instructional Leadership and School Achievement: Validation of a Causal Model,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2): 94–125.
23.
HendersonJ. E., and HoyW. K.1982. “Leader Authenticity: The Development and Test of an Operational Measure,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
24.
HendersonJ. E., and HoyW. K.1983. “Leader Authenticity: The Development and Test of an Operational Measure,”Educational and Psychological Research, 3(2): 63–75.
25.
ImberM.1983. “Increased Decision Making Involvement for Teachers: Ethical and Practical Considerations,”The Journal of Educational Thought, 17(1): 36–42.
26.
JohnsonG. S., and GerminarioV.1985. “Relationship between Teacher Decisional Status and Loyalty,”The Journal of Educational Administration, 23: 91–105.
27.
KirbyP. C.1992. “Shared Decision Making: Moving from Concerns about Restrooms to Concerns about Classrooms,”Journal of School Leadership, 2: 330–344.
28.
KouzesJ., and PosnerB.1990. The Leadership Challenge: How to Get Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,
29.
LaganaJ. S.1989. “Managing Change and School Improvement Effectively,”NASSP Bulletin, 73: 52–55.
30.
MaeroffG. I.1988. “Blueprint for Empowering Teachers,”Phi Delta Kappan, 69: 473–477.
31.
MertensS., and YargerS. J.1988. “Teaching as a Profession: Leadership, Empowerment, and Involvement,”Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1): 32–37.
32.
MojkowskiC., and FlemingD.1988. School-Site Management: Concepts and Approaches, Cranston, Rhode Island: Educational Leadership Academy
33.
NybergD., and FarberP.1986. “Authority in Education,”Teachers College Record, 88: 404–414.
34.
PierceL. C.1977. “School Site Management,” occasional paper of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, Program in Education for a Changing Society, Cambridge, MA.
35.
SeemanM.1960. Sociological Status and Leadership.Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
36.
SeemanM.1966. “Status and Identity: The Problems of Inauthenticity,”Pacific Sociological Review, 9: 67–73.
37.
SicklerJ. L.1988. “Teachers in Charge: Empowering the Professionals,”Phi Delta Kappan, 69: 354–358.
38.
TaylorB. O., and LevineD. U.1991. “Effective Schools Projects and School-Based Management,”Phi Delta Kappan, 46(8): 394–397.
39.
ThomsonS.1992. School Leadership: A Blueprint for ChangeNewbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
40.
WiseA., and Darling-HammondL.1985. “Teacher Evaluation and Teacher Professionalism.”Educational Leadership, 42(5): 24–29.
41.
WisslerD. F., and OrtizF. I.1988. The Superintendent's Leadership in School Reform.Philadelphia: The Farmer Press.
