This article is a report of one effort to directly influence state education policy discussions through a coordinated plan. The report is presented as a case study. The case study includes a description of the development, implementation, and outcomes of a state legislative relations plan. Recommendations to others seeking to influence education policy include: become involved with the State Education Policy Seminars; secure sponsorship of activities from a foundation or educational laboratory; and seek policy discussion participants who are leaders in their constituent groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC., JenkinsD., and KemmisS.1976. “Re-thinking Case Study: Notes from the Second Cambridge Conference,”Cambridge Journal of Education, 6(3): 139–150.
2.
BernsteinM. H.1985. “Forging New Legislative Alliances: Higher Education in the State Capitol,”Educational Record, 66: 30–31.
3.
BogdanR. C., and BiklenS. K.1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
CohenD. K.1990. “Governance and Instruction: The Promise of Decentralization and Choice,”Choice and Control in American Education: Volume 1, CluneW. H., and WitteJ. F., eds., Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
5.
CohenL., and ManionL.1985. Research Methods in Education, 2nd Edition.London: Croom Helm.
6.
DavidJ.1990. “What Is Restructuring,”Work America, 7(2).
7.
ECS/IEL. 1988. “A Guide for ECS/IEL State Education Policy Seminars (SEPS): A Program Jointly Sponsored by the Education Commission of the States and the Institute for Educational Leadership.
8.
1990. “From Schoolhouse to Statehouse: Restructuring Our Schools through Re: Learning,”First Re: Learning Teleconference … Student as Worker, Teacher as Coach.
9.
GroveS. K., and CarpenterJ.1977. “State Lobbying for Higher Education,”Educational Record, 58: 357–372.
10.
KrepelT. L., and GradyM. L.1988. “Planning for State Legislative Relations: A Case Study,”Planning and Changing, 19(4): 216–223.
11.
MazzoniT., and MalenB.1985. “Mobilizing Constituency Pressure to Influence State Education Policy Making,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 21: 91–116.
12.
MedcalfR. L.1983. “Follow These Lobbying Guidelines, and You Just Might Get the Laws You Deserve,”American School Board Journal, 170: 39.
13.
MilesM. B., and HubermanA. M.1984. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
RichardsonV.1991. Book Review of “The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational Practice,” Schon, ed., New York: Teachers College Press, Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4): 309–313.
15.
U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census.1991. 1990 Census of Population: Volume 1 Characteristics of the Population.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16.
U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.1989. National Center for Education Statistics: Digest of Education Statistics 1989, Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
17.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget and Evaluation.1989. State Education Performance Chart Supplement, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
WestP. T.1985. Educational Public Relations.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
YinR. K.1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
