This study was designed to determine the level of competency that beginning principals perceived they had in their primary areas of responsibility when appointed to the position. Secondarily, the study determined what beginning principals perceived to be their greatest challenges and frustrations, most familiar and most unfamiliar areas of responsibility, and who was most and least helpful to them as new principals. The findings indicated that beginning principals are challenged by the following: delegating responsibilities and becoming familiar with the principal's role, the local school, and school operations. Their major frustrations were role adjustment, the (large) amount of responsibility, and time management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvyH., and ColadarciT.1985. “Problems of the Novice Principal,”Research in Rural Education, 3(1): 39–47.
2.
BarthR. S.1985. “Principal-Centered Professional Development,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
3.
BrookoverW. L., BeamerL., EsthinH., HathawayD., LezotteL., MillerS., PassalacquaJ., and TornetzkyL.1982. Creating Effective Schools.Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications.
4.
BrophyJ. E., and GoodT. L.1986. “School Effects,” in Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd Edition, WittrockM. C., ed., New York, NY: MacMillan Publishing Company, pp. 570–602.
5.
ConleyG.1976. “A Study of Administrative Competencies for Beginning School Principals in Northern Illinois,” Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University;Dissertation Abstracts International, 37: 4734–4735A (University Microfilms no. 77,3793).
6.
DareshJ.1986. “Support for Beginning Principals: First Hurdles Are Highest,”Theory into Practice, 25: 168–173.
7.
DevoiseW.1984. “Synthesis of Research on the Principal as Instructional Leader,”Educational Leadership, 41(5): 14–20.
8.
DukeD. L.1984. Transition to Leadership: An Investigation of the First Year of the Principalship.Portland, OR: Lewis and Clark College.
EdmondsR.1979. “Effective Schools for the Urban Poor,”Educational Leadership, 37: 15–24.
12.
EllettC., and PayneD.Principal Performance Description Survey. Project ROME (Results Oriented Management in Education).Athens, GA: University of Georgia.
13.
GarberianaM. R.1980. “Rites of Passage: Role Socialization among Novice Principals,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C.
14.
GreeneE. E.1990. “The Perceptions and Uses of Power by First-Time High School Principals: An Application of Etzioni's Compliance Theory,” Doctoral dissertation, The University of Florida, Gainesville.
15.
LezotteL. W., HathawayD., MillerS., PassalacqueJ., and BrookoverW. B.1980. School Learning Climate and Student Achievement.Tallahassee, FL: National Teacher Corps, Florida State University Foundation.
16.
LyonsJ.1979. “A Study of Competencies Needed by Secondary Principals,” Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University; Dissertation Abstracts International, 39,5858A (University Microfilms no. 79-08175).
17.
ParkayF. W., and HallG. E.1992a. Becoming a Principal: The Challenges of Beginning Leadership.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
18.
ParkayF. W., and HallG. E.1992b. “Beginning Principals and the Challenges of Leadership,” in Becoming a Principal: The Challenges of Beginning Leadership, ParkayF. N., and HallG. E., eds., Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 1–18.
19.
SussmanL.1986. “The Principal's First Year: The Mutual Process of Developing Leadership,” paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
