This paper presents a conceptual analysis of the nature of reflective practice and an argument for emphasizing reflective practice in the preparation and professional development of school leaders. The authors argue that professional preparation that develops reflective practice is one way to resolve the theory-practice dichotomy and to improve professional practice. Further, they assert that preparation programs have the instructional methodologies that encourage and nurture reflection on the messy problems of practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArgyrisC., and SchonD. A.1974. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AshbaughC. R., and KastenK. L.1991a. Educational Leadership: Case Studies for Reflective Practice.New York, NY: Longman.
3.
AshbaughC. R., and KastenK. L.1991b. Instructor's Guide for Educational Leadership: Case Studies for Reflective PracticeNew York, NY: Longman.
4.
BridgesE. M., and HallingerP.1991. “Problem-Based Learning: A Promising Approach for Preparing Educational Administrators,”UCEA Review, 22(3): 3–8.
5.
CoddJ.1989. “Educational Leadership as Reflective Action,” in Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership, SmythJ., ed., New York, NY: Falmer Press, pp. 157–178.
6.
DeweyJ.1933. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process.Boston, MA: D. C. Heath.
7.
DeweyJ.1938. Experience and Education.New York, NY: MacMillan.
8.
EversC. W., and LakomskiG.1991. Knowing Educational Administration.New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
9.
FosterW.1989. “Toward a Critical Practice of Leadership,” in Critical Perspectives on Educational Leadership, SmythJ., ed., New York, NY: Falmer Press, pp. 39–62.
10.
GreenwoodD. J.1991. “Collective Reflective Practice through Participatory Action Research: A Case Study from the Fagor Cooperatives of Mondragon,” in The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational Practice, SchonD., ed., New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
11.
KottkampR. B., and MillerJ. L.1991. “Come, Let us Reflect Together: A Study of Administrators at Different Levels Meeting to Reflect,” paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Baltimore
12.
LortieD.1975. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
MersethK. K.1991. “The Early History of Case-Based Instruction: Insights for Teacher Education Today,”Journal of Teacher Education, 42: 243–249.
14.
OstermanK. F.1990. “Reflective Practice: A New Agenda for Education,”Education and Urban Society, 22: 133–152.
15.
ScheinE. H.1972. Professional Education: Some New Directions.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
16.
SchonD. A.1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.New York, NY: Basic Books.
17.
SchonD. A.1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
SchonD. A.1991. The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational PracticeNew York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
ShulmanJ. H.1991. “Revealing the Mysteries of Teacher Written Cases: Opening the Black Box,”Journal of Teacher Education, 42: 250–262.
20.
ShortP. M., and RinehartJ. S.1991. “Critical Reflective Thinking as a Means of Professional Development,” paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Baltimore.
