The worldwide condition of education is not well according to many observers of the international scene. In many countries, including the United States, continuing reform and change of education is a way of life. A new vision of leadership is necessary if educators are to achieve results that are considered successful by most societies. This paper addresses two levels of educational leadership within the context of an international mission for education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbrechtJ.1984. “A Nation at Risk: Another View,”Phi Delta Kappan.65(10): 684–685.
2.
AllportF.1924. Social Psychology.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
3.
BartonP.1991. The Education Reform Decade.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4.
CoombsP.1968. The World Education Crisis: A System Analysis.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
CoombsP.1985. The World Crisis in Education.New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
DalinP.1978. Limits to Educational Change.New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
7.
ElmoreR., and MclaughlinM.1988. Steady Work: Policy, Practice, and the Reform of American Education.Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
8.
GrahamP.1984. “Schools: Cacophony about Practice, Silence about Purpose,”Daedalus.113(4): 29–57.
9.
GriffithsD., StoutR., and ForsythP., eds. 1988. Leaders for America's Schools.Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
10.
HackerA.1984. “The Schools Flunk Out,”The New York Review of Books, 31(6): 35–40.
11.
KearnsD.1988. “An Educational Recovery Plan for America,”Phi Delta Kappan.69(8): 565–570.
12.
KotterJ.1990. A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management.New York, NY: The Free Press.
13.
MooreB.1927. “The May Conference on Leadership,”Personnel Journal, pp. 126–128.
14.
MurphyJ.1990. “Restructuring the Technical Core of Preparation Programs in Educational Administration,”UCEA Review, 31(3): 4, 5,10–13.
15.
National Commission on Excellence in Education.1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
16.
PenningN.1989. “The Silver Lining in Education's Thunderclouds,”The School Administrator.46(2): 50.
17.
ReillyD.1989. “Public and Teacher Education in the Republic of Cyprus: A Comparison with Recent Developments in the United States,”Education and Society.7(1): 31–38.
18.
ReillyD. In press. “Educational Reform in the United States and the Soviet Union: An Analysis and Comparison,”International Journal of Educational Management.
19.
RestineL., KrugerJ., and MilsteinM.Praxis: A Response to Effective Leading and Learning. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, PA. October 1990.
20.
SarasonS.1972. The Creation of Settings and Future Societies.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
21.
SarasonS.1982. The Culture of the School and the Problem of Change.Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
22.
SchlechtyP.1990. Schools for the Twenty-First Century: Leadership Imperatives for Educational Reform.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
23.
Southern Regional Consortium of Colleges of Education.1990. “SRCCE Policy Statement on School Leadership Preparation Programs.”
24.
StogdillR.1974. Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research.New York, NY: The Free Press.
25.
YagodinG.1989. Towards Higher Standards in Education through Its Humanization and Democratization.Moscow: Novosti Press Agency Publishing House.
