This paper presents the results of a study of superintendents who have served in one rural school district for twelve years or more. Superintendents in twenty-four districts were identified and interviewed. The superintendents shared demographic information, insights into their school boards, and professional opinions as to the reasons for their longevity. Reasons for their success were a stable school board, open communication, hiring good employees, and working closely with the local community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettM.1982. Perceptions of the Leadership Style: Effectiveness of Superintendents in Mississippi.New Orleans, LA: Mid-South Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 242 087).
2.
CarlsonR.O.1962. Executive Succession and Organizational Change.Chicago: University of Chicago.
3.
ChanceE. W., and CappsJ. L.1990. Administrator Stability in Rural Schools: The School Board Factor. Unpublished manuscript. University of Oklahoma, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, Norman, OK.
4.
CubanL.1985. “Conflict and Leadership in the Superintendency.”Phi Delta Kappan, 67: 28–30.
5.
GetzelsJ. W., and GubaE. G.1951. “Social Behavior and the Administrative Process.”School Review, 65: 423–441.
6.
GouldnerA.1957. “Cosmopolitans and Locals: Toward an Analysis of Latent Social Roles.”Administrative Science Quarterly, 2: 281–306.
7.
GoushaR.1981. What's Happening to Superintendents?Atlanta, GA: American Association of School Administrators (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 204 845).
8.
GradyM. L., and BryantM. T.1991. “School Board Turmoil and Superintendent Turnover: What Pushes Them to the Brink?”The School Administrator, 48: 19–26.
9.
GradyM. L., and BryantM. T.1991. “School Board Presidents Tell Why Their Superintendents Fail.”The Executive Educator, pp. 24–25.
10.
FreundS. A.1988. “Here's How I Stay Friends with the Board President.”The American School Board Journal, 175: 39.
11.
IannacconeL.1982. “Superintendents Make a Difference.”The School Administrator, 38: 16–17.
12.
KatzM.1985. “Match Working Styles and Find Your Way to Board/ Superintendent Harmony.”The American School Board Journal, pp. 33–34.
13.
LueheB.1989. “Fine-Tuning Keeps Board/Superintendent Relations on Track and Running Smoothly.”The American School Board Journal, 176: 33.
14.
McCarthyR.1990. “Consultant as Coaches.”The American School Board Journal, 177: 26–27.
15.
MirgaT.1985. “The High-Pressure World of Superintendents.”Education Week, 31–32.
16.
MonteithD. S., and HallumsM.1989. The Exodus of South Carolina Superintendents (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 531).
17.
OrtizF., and MarshallC.1988. “Women in School Administration.” in Review of Research in Educational Administration, BoyanN., ed., New York: Longman.
18.
ShakeshaftC.1986. Women in Educational Administration.Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
19.
ShepherdG.1986. Survival Strategies and the Superintendency.San Francisco, CA: American Educational Research Association (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 270 848).
20.
ThomasM. D.1986. Why Aren't Women Administering Our Schools?National Association of Secondary School Principals, pp. 90–93.
21.
WildmanL.1987. What Can Superintendents and Board Members Do to Help Each Other Be Successful?San Diego, CA: National Council of States on Inservice Education (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 294 312).
22.
YockC., KeoughK. E., UnderwoodK. E., and FortuneJ. C.1990. “Happily Ever After.”The American School Board Journal, 177: 28–35.
