In a few university administrator preparation programs, experienced principals are being used effectively as mentors to aspiring principals. The mentoring relationship has been found to be more positive and beneficial if the practicum experience is long term and the mentor is seen as an important member of the university training effort. Under the best of circumstances problems may occur that affect the value of mentoring. The article discusses twelve common pitfalls of mentoring and provides suggestions for their resolution.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllemanE., CochranJ., DoverspikeJ., and NewmanI.1984. “Enriching Mentoring Relationship,”The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 62: 329–332.
2.
DareshJ. C.1986. “Field-Based Educational Administration Training Programs,”Planning and Changing, 17: 107–118.
3.
HenneckeM.J.1983. “Mentors and Proteges: How to Build Relationships that Work,”Training, 20(7): 36–41.
4.
MerriamS.1983. “Mentors and Proteges: A Critical Review of the Literature,”Adult Education Quarterly, 33(3): 161–173.
5.
MuseI. D., WasdenF. D., and ThomasG. J.1988. The Mentor Principal Handbook.Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
6.
WasdenF. D., MuseI. D., and OvardG. F.1987. “Preparing Principals in a School-University Partnership,”Principal, 66(9): 16–18.
7.
ZeyM. G.1984. The Mentor Connection.Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
