Empowerment as a means of school reform is a term rich with metaphor. A number of studies have used the metaphor of power in the physical science sense to describe power in the organizational sense. In this paper, school as an electrical distribution system is offered as a metaphor for describing how power operates in schools. Eight lessons for school administrators are offered to increase the likelihood that empowerment will produce positive results in the school setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarbulesN.1986. “A Theory of Power in Education,”Education Theory, 36(Spring): 95–114.
2.
BennisW., and NanusB.1985. Leaders: The Strategy for Taking Charge.New York: Harper & Row.
3.
BredesonP.1987. “Language of Leadership: Metaphor Making in Educational Administration,”Administrator's Notebook, 32(6): 1–5.
4.
CurcioJ.1990. “Qualitative Observations of the Use of Power by Beginning Principals: The Cases of Mary and Herb,”Educational Horizons, 68(Spring): 133–139.
5.
DanielsC.1990. “A Principal's View-Giving Up My Traditional Ship,”The School Administrator, 8(47): 20–24.
6.
DunlapD., and GoldmanP.1991. “Rethinking Power in Schools,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(1): 5–29.
7.
FrenchJ. P. R.Jr., and RavenB. H.1959. “The Bases of Social Power,” in Studies in Social Power, CartwrightD., ed., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
GarmstonR.1988. “Empowering Teachers: Some Practical Steps,”Thrust, 18(October): 21–24.
9.
GartonI., and ValentineJ.1989. “Strategies for Faculty Involvement in Effective Schools,”NASSP Bulletin, 73(March): 1–6.
10.
GlickmanC.1990. “Pushing School Reform to a New Edge: The Seven Ironies of School Empowerment,”Phi Delta Kappan, 72(September): 68–75.
11.
GolandaE.1990. “The Importance of the Source of Power in an Educational Setting,” paper presented at The Meeting of the Southern Regional Conference on Educational Administration, Atlanta, GA.
12.
HallingerP., and RichardsonD.1988. “Models of Shared Leadership: Evolving Structures and Relationships,”The Urban Review, 20: 229–245.
13.
HerlihyB., and HerlihyD.1985. “Improving Principal-Teacher Relationships by Understanding the Concept of Power,”NASSP Bulletin, 69(December): 95–102.
14.
LakeoffG., and JohnsonM.1980. Metaphors We Live By.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
15.
LewisA.1989. Restructuring America's Schools.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
16.
MaeroffG.1988. “A Blueprint for Empowering Teachers,”Phi Delta Kappan, 69(March): 472–477.
17.
MitchellJ. E.1990. “Share the Power,”American School Board Journal, 177(Jariuary): 42–43.
18.
MurphyJ. F.1990. “Restructuring Schools: Capturing the Phenomenon,” paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
19.
NoblitG. W., and EakerD. J.1989. “Discovering a Common Interest: Teacher Planning as Appropriation of Power,”High School Journal, 72(April/May): 161–167.
20.
NorthrupE. F.1917. Laws of Physical Science.Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
21.
O'NeilJ.1990. “Piecing Together the Restructuring Puzzle,”Educational Leadership, 47: 4–10.
22.
OrrR.1984. Hungry Spirits: A View of Fundamental Education.New York: Vantage Press.
23.
PamE.1988. “Prisms of Power,”Education, 109(Winter): 131–140.
24.
SergiovanniT. J., BurlingameM., CoombsF. D., and ThurstonP. W.1980. Educational Governance and Administration.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
StimsonT. D., and ApplebaumR. P.1988. “Empowering Teachers: Do Principals Have the Power?”Phi Delta Kappan, 70(December): 313–316.
26.
WolfeM. P., HowellG. L., and CharlandJ. A.1989. “Energizing the School Community,”The Clearing House, 63(September): 29–32.
