The instructional imperatives of the principalship demand a knowledge of more than the direct instruction model. Changing the role of the direct instruction model from an instructional methodology to a planning tool permits the principal to introduce additional instructional methods based upon the characteristics of the school and the classroom. The article presents a set of frames for the implementation of instructional methods and strategies.
AndersonR. C., and PearsonP. D.1984. “A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension,” in The Handbook of Reading Research, PearsonP. D., ed., New York: Longman.
3.
BakerL., and BrownA. L.1984. “Metacognitive Skills and Reading,” in The Handbook of Reading Research, PearsonP. D., ed., New York: Longman.
4.
DukeD. L.1990. Teaching An Introduction.New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
5.
GlickmanC.1991. “Pretending Not to Know What We Know,”Educational Leadership, 48(8): 4–9.
6.
JoyceB., and WeilM.1986. Models of Teaching, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
7.
MasonJ. M., and AuK. H.1990. Reading Instruction for Today.Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
8.
ParisS. G.1987. Making Thinking Public.Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
9.
SamuelsS. J.1988. “Decoding and Automaticity: Helping Poor Readers Become Automatic at Word Recognition,”The Reading Teacher, 41: 756–760.
10.
TaylorW.1953. “Cloze Procedure: A New Tool for Measuring Readability,”Journalism Quarterly, 30: 415–433.
