This paper attempts to apply chaos theory to social organization. It begins with a mathematical definition of chaos. Specifically, the geometric concept of attractor is explored; phase space and Poincaré maps are discussed and applied to the concept of attractor; and nonlinearity is conceptually defined. We then apply the mathematics of chaos to social systems by showing how a nonlinear equation might be used to describe organization and how data derived from a simple univariate equation can be converted into a multivariate Poincaré map. The conclusion section identifies three approaches to analyzing chaos in social organization: metaphorical analysis, mathematical modeling, and data collection. Finally, possible uses of chaos are explored, as are the shortcomings of such analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BragerGeorge. 1969. “Commitment and Conflict in a Normative Organization,”American Sociological Review, 34: 482–491.
2.
BuckleyWalter. 1967. Sociology and Modern Systems Theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
3.
CartwrightT. J.1991. “Planning and Chaos Theory,”Journal of the American Planning Association, 57(1): 44–56.
4.
CohenMichael D., MarchJames G., and OlsenJohan P.1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice,”Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 1–25.
5.
CorwinRonald G.1987. The Organizational-Society Nexus: A Critical Review of Models and Metaphors.New York: Greenwood Press.
6.
CronbachLee J.1988. “Playing with Chaos,”Educational Researcher, 17(6): 46–49.
7.
CrowellSam. 1989. “A New Way of Thinking: The Challenge of the Future,”Educational Leadership, 47(1): 60–63.
DollWilliam E.Jr.1989. “Complexity in the Classroom,”Educational Leadership, 47(1): 65–70.
10.
GellerHenry A., and JohnsonA. P.1990. “Policy as Linear and Nonlinear Science,”Journal of Educational Policy, 5(1): 49–65.
11.
GleichJames. 1987. Chaos: Making a New Science.New York: Viking.
12.
GriffithsDaniel E., HartAnn W., and BlairBillie Goode1991. “Still Another Approach to Administration: Chaos Theory,”Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2): 430–451.
HénonMichel. 1976. “A Two-Dimensional Mapping with a Strange Attractor,”Communications in Mathematical Physics, 50: 69–77.
15.
LandauL. D., and LifshitzE. M.1959. Fluid Mechanics.Oxford: Pergamon.
16.
LindsayJean S.1989. “Chaos Theory: Implications for Educational Research,” paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Savannah, Georgia.
17.
LindsayJean S.1991. “The ‘Chaos’ Pattern in Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development,” paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
18.
LorenzEdward. 1964. “The Problem of Deducing the Climate from the Governing Equations,”Tellus, 16: 1–11.
19.
MaclverRobert M.1964. Social Causation.New York: Harper & Row.
20.
MandlebrotBenoit B.1983. The Fractal Geometry of Nature.New York: W. H. Freeman
21.
MayRobert M.1976. “Simple Mathematical Models with Very Complicated Dynamics,”Nature, 261: 459–467.
22.
McLaughlinMilbrey W.1990. “The Rand Change Agent Study Revisited: Macro Perspectives and Micro Realities,”Educational Researcher, 19(9): 11–16.
23.
NielsenFrançois, and RosenfeldRachel A.1981. “Substantive Interpretations of Differential Equation Models,”American Sociological Review, 46(2): 159–174.
24.
PackardNorman H., CrutchfieldJames P., Doyne FarmerJ., and ShawRobert S.1980. “Geometry from a Time Series,”Physical Review Letters, 45(9): 712–716.
25.
PetersonIvars. 1988. The Mathematical Tourist.New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
26.
PoolRobert1989a. “Chaos Theory: How Big an Advance?”Science, 245: 26–28.
27.
PoolRobert, 1989b. “Is It Chaos, or Is It Just Noise?”Science, 243: 25–28.
28.
PriesmeyerH. Richard, and BaikKibok. 1989. “Discovering the Patterns in Chaos,”Planning Review, 17(6): 14–21, 47.
29.
Rand Corporation.1974. Volume I: A Model of Educational Change. (Research Rep. No. R-1589/1-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
30.
RouxJ. C., RossiA., BachelartS., and VidalC.1990. “Representation of a Strange Attractor from an Experimental Study of Chemical Turbulence,”Physics Letters, 77A(6): 391–393.
31.
RuelleDavid, and TakensFloris1971. “On the Nature of Turbulence,”Communications in Mathematical Physics, 20: 167–192.
32.
RuelleDavid. 1989. Chaotic Evolution and Strange Attractors.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ScheinEdgar H.1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
StermanJohn D.1988. “Deterministic Chaos in Models of Human Behavior: Methodological Issues and Experimental Results,”System Dynamics Review, 4(1-2): 148–178.
35.
StewartIan. 1989. Does God Play Dice: The Mathematics of Chaos.Cambridge, Massachussets: Basil Blackwell, Inc.
36.
TaubesGary. 1989. “The Body Chaotic,”Discover, 10(5): 62–67.
