Because schools are a customary location to conduct child abuse and neglect investigative interviews, this study examines survey results from 109 principals in Tennessee to determine if the Title I status of a school or years of experience as a principal predict awareness of DCS interview policies and an ability to accurately interpret policies related to school-based interviews. A statistically significant relationship was found between the Title I status of a school and principals’ awareness of interview policies. Not all school principals in Tennessee were aware of or could accurately interpret policies for conducting interviews. This study identified principals being more aware of school district issued policies than state-issued policies, and that including the DCS policy as part of school-district policy may increase awareness.
BartucciG. T. (2012). Building a climate that supports and protects mandated reporters: School principals and their perceived roles and policies and procedures in K-8 schools[Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3526256).
5.
BellM. M., & SinghM. I. (2017). Implementing a collaborative support model for educators reporting child maltreatment. Children & Schools, 39(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdw041
6.
BoydM. N. (2017). Public and private school principals’ Knowledge of special education law (Doctoral field project, University of Nebraska at Omaha). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database.(UMI No. 10257846).
7.
BridgelandW. M., & DuaneE. A. (1990). Principals as secondary enforcers in child abuse. Education and Urban Society, 22(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124590022003008
8.
BuchananD. K. (2011). A comparative analysis of school counselors’ and school principals’ perceptions of school counselors’ activities. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee).https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1170
ClemensE. V., HelmH. M., MyersK., ThomasC., & TisM. (2017). The voices of youth formerly in foster care: Perspectives on educational attainment gaps. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.003
CoughlinA. B., & DotgerB. H. (2016). “How can I help?” Practicing familial support through simulation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 43, 77–96. https://www.jstor.org/journal/teaceducquar
13.
CrenshawW. B., CrenshawL. M., & LichtenbergJ. W. (1995). When educators confront child abuse: An analysis of the decision to report. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(9), 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(95)00071-F
14.
CrowG., DayC., & MøllerJ. (2017). Framing research on school principals’ identities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1123299
DodsonR. L. (2014). Which field experiences best prepare future school leaders? An analysis of Kentucky’s principal preparation program. Educational Research Quarterly, 37(4), 41–56. http://erquarterly.org/
17.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
GullattD. (1999). Collaborative efforts are required as schools address suspected child abuse. Contemporary Education, 71, 24. https://search.ebscohost.com
20.
Gupta-KaganJ. (2012). Beyond law enforcement: Camreta v. Greene, child protection investigations, and the need to reform the Fourth Amendment special needs doctrine. Tulane Law Review, 87, 1–74. https://www.ebscohost.com/
21.
HallE., ChaiW., & AlbrechtJ. A. (2016). Relationships between nutrition-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior for fifth grade students attending Title I and non-Title I schools. Appetite, 96, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.033
22.
HutchinsonL. A. (2007). Reporting child abuse and neglect. Ohio Law, 21(2), 17–21. www.heinonline.org
KennyM. C., & McEachernA. G. (2002). Reporting suspected child abuse: A pilot comparison of middle and high school counselors and principals. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 11(2), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v11n02_04
KwapiszJ. (2012). Fourth Amendment implications of interviewing suspected victims of abuse in school. St. John’s Law Review, 86(3). 963–1009. http://heinonline.org
30.
LomascoloD. J. (2016). Principals’ perceptions of the Tennessee teacher tenure law: A concurrent mixed methods study.. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee). https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3717
McCabeJ. (2018). Child welfare interviews at school: A review of statutes and policies. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35(4), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-018-0535-7
33.
McKeeB. E., & DillenburgerK. (2009). Child abuse and neglect: Training needs of student teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 48(5), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2010.03.002
MorrisseyT. W., HutchisonL., & WinslerA. (2014). Family income, school attendance, and academic achievement in elementary school. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 741. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033848
RosienJ., HelmsL., & WanatC. (1993). Intent v. practice: Incentives and disincentives for child abuse reporting by school personnel. BYU Education & Law Journal, 193, 102–126. https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/elj/
ShoopR. J., & FirestoneL. M. (1988). Mandatory reporting of suspected child abuse: Do teachers obey the law? West’s Education Law Reporter, 46, 1115–1122.
47.
StednitzN. (2011). Ending family trauma without compensation: Drafting Sec. 1983 complaints for victims of wrongful child abuse investigations. Oregon Law Review, 90, 1423–1448. http://heinonline.org
48.
Tennessee Department of Children’s Services. (2017a). Administrative policies and procedures: 14.7: Child protective services investigation track.
49.
Tennessee Department of Children’s Services. (2017b). Work Aid-3—Child protective services investigative tasks and activities—Supplemental to DCS Policy: 14.7 child protective services investigation track.
ThompsonD. B. (2011). Camreta v. Greene: No guidance from Supreme Court for in-school interviews of suspected child-abuse victims. Policy & Practice, 69(6), 33. https://www.questia.com/library/p2252/policy-practice
52.
YourtzR. (2012). Letting the fox guard the hen house: Why the Fourth Amendment should not be applied to interviews of children in child abuse cases. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 40(3), 653–675. http://heinonline.org
53.
VanbergeijkE. O. (2007). Mandated reporting among school personnel. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 15(2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J146v15n02_02
54.
ZellmanG. L. (1990). Linking schools and social services: The case of child abuse reporting. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012001041
