Emphasizing Technology Over Instruction: Adapting a 20-Year-Old Survey to Examine the Climate of K–12 Instructional Technology Leadership in Public School Districts

Abstract

Current research on computer technology integration in K–12 school classrooms indicates that student learning outcomes remain flat despite heavy investment. Examining school leadership conceptions about technology integration might reveal a way to reverse this trend. This study adapts a survey instrument from Brush and Bannon and applies it to Indiana school district superintendents. Key findings indicate respondents perceive developing technology goals and plans for a school district, providing instructional support, and integrating technology into a core curriculum are very important for instructional technology leadership, but educational experiences and credentials are less important. However, respondents from school districts with smaller student enrollments and who report having little or no knowledge of instructional technology tend to view educational experiences and credentials more highly than respondents from larger schools and who report being very knowledgeable. Implications are that superintendents tend to emphasize the technology-use aspect of instructional technology leadership over instructional proficiencies.

Keywords

district superintendents instructional technology K–12 education school leadership technology integration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

Jacobsen

(2016). Principals’ technology leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 26, 811–836.

Brush

Bannon

(1998). Characteristics of technology leaders: A survey of school administration in the United States. International Studies in Educational Administration, 26, 47–56.

Center for the Advanced Study of Technology Leadership in Education. (2005). Principals technology leadership assessment [Data file]. Retrieved from http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/PTLA-Packet.pdf

Creswell

J. W.

(2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.) . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Earthman

G. I.

(2013). Planning educational facilities: What educators need to know (4th ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.

Eisner

E. W.

(2009). What does it mean to say a school is doing well? In Flinders

Thornton

(Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 327–335). New York, NY: Routledge.

Faris

M. J.

Selber

S. A

. (2013). iPads in the technical communication classroom: An empirical study of technology integration and use. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27(4), 359–408.

Federal Communications Commission (2018). E-Rate—Schools & libraries USF program. Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.fcc.gov/general/e-rate-schools-libraries-usf-program

Frazier

(2012). The technology coordinator’s handbook (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.

10.

Gosmire

Grady

M. L.

(2007). A bumpy road: Principal as technology leader. Principal Leadership, 7, 16–21.

11.

Greene

(2009). Curriculum and consciousness. In Flinders

Thornton

(Eds.), The curriculum studies reader (3rd ed., pp. 155–167). New York, NY: Routledge.

12.

Groves

R. M.

Fowler

F. J.

Jr Couper

M. P.

Lepkowski

J. M.

Singer

Tourangeau

(2011). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

13.

Hew

K. F.

Brush

(2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research and Development, 55, 223–252.

14.

Houston

(2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–100.

15.

Hsu

Sharma

(2008). A case study of enabling factors in the technology integration change process. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11, 213–228.

16.

Hughes

J. E.

Boklage

(2016). A case study of technology leadership in situ. Journal of School Leadership, 26, 283–313.

17.

Hutchison

Reinking

(2011). Teachers’ perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 312–333.

18.

International Society for Technology in Education (2018). ISTE Standards for education leaders. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/for-education-leaders

19.

Lambert

Erickson

Alhramelah

Rhoton

Lindbeck

Sammons

(2014). Technology and adult students in higher education: A review of the literature. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 2, 1–19.

20.

Loewenthal

K. M.

(2001). An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2nd ed.). London, England: Psychology Press.

21.

Luschei

T. F.

(2014). Assessing the costs and benefits of educational technology. In Spector

J. M.

Merrill

M. D.

Elen

Bishop

M. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 239–248). New York, NY: Springer.

22.

McLeod

(2015). The challenges of digital leadership. Independent School, 74, 50–56.

23.

Mishra

Koehler

M. J.

(2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.

24.

Norris

Sullivan

Poirot

Soloway

(2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 15–27.

25.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). Students, computers, and learning: Making the connection. Paris, France: Author. Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/students-computers-and-learning_9789264239555-en

26.

Pallant

(2013). SPSS survival manual (5th ed.). Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill Education.

27.

Player-Koro

Tallvid

(2015). Title one laptop on each desk: Teaching methods in technology rich classrooms. International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 11, 180–193.

28.

Shattuck

(2010). Understanding school leaders’ role in teachers’ adoption of technology integration classroom practices. In Orey

Jones

S. A.

Branch

R. M.

(Eds.), Educational media and technology yearbook 35 (pp. 7–28). New York, NY: Springer.

29.

Shuldman

. (2004). Superintendent conceptions of institutional conditions that impact teacher technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 319–343.

30.

Sims

R. C.

Koszalka

T. A.

(2008). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In Spector

J. M.

Merrill

M. D.

van Merrienboer

Driscoll

M. P

(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 569–575). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates/Taylor & Francis Group.

31.

Sorensen

B. J.

Shepherd

C. E.

Range

B. G.

(2013). Implications for educational leaders as they consider technology development. Planning & Changing, 44, 73–86.

32.

Sugar

Hollomon

(2009). Technology leaders wanted: Acknowledging the leadership role of a technology coordinator. TechTrends, 53, 66–75.

33.

Thompson

Schrum

Bell

(2008). Framing research on technology and student learning in the content area: Implications for educators. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

34.

Tourangeau

(2000). The psychology of survey responses. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

35.

U.S. Department of Education (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in education (2017 national education technology plan update). Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Technology. Retrieved from https://tech.ed.gov/files/2017/01/NETP17.pdf

36.

Vanderlinde

Van Braak

Hermans

(2009). Educational technology on a turning point: Curriculum implementation in Flanders and challenges for schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 573–584.

37.

Wachira

Keengwe

(2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 17–25.

38.

Watson

Pape

Murin

Gemin

Vashaw

(2014). Keeping pace with K-12 digital learning: An annual review of policy and practice (11th ed.). Mountain View, CA: Evergreen Education Group.

39.

Whitehead

Jensen

Boschee

(2013). Planning for technology: A guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

40.

Williamson

Dillon

Immings

Jensen

(2014). Career tracks: Teacher educator. Educational Horizons, 92, 16–23.