This research explored the transformational leadership traits of principal participants in the Northeast of the United States. The mixed methods case study utilized two data sources: The Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI; n = 110) and individual interviews (n = 28). Descriptive statistical data analyses highlighted the five pillars of transformative leadership and suggested that the human component of leadership was essential to participant perceptions. Three finding statements emerged from the qualitative data analysis. First, participant principals believed themselves to be transformational leaders. Second, participants considered change to be a central tenet to their understanding of transformational leadership. Finally, the intangible, human elements of leadership were fundamental to participants’ perceptions of transformational leadership. Implications and recommendations are discussed.
AllenP.BennettK.HeritageB. (2014). SPSS statistics version 22: A practical guide. Sydney, Australia: Cengage Learning.
2.
BaglibelM.SamanciogluM.OzmantarZ. K.HallG. E. (2014). The relationship between school principals’ perceived change facilitator styles and teachers’ attitudes towards change. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 42, 55–67.
3.
BaxterP.JackS. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13, 544–559.
4.
BaylerA. (2012). Transformational leadership behaviors of school principals: A qualitative research based on teachers’ perceptions. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 581–591.
5.
BogdanR.BiklenS. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
6.
CherkowskiS.WalkerK. D.KutsyurubaB. (2015). Principals’ moral agency and ethical decision-making: Toward a transformational ethics. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 10, 1–17. doi:10.22230/ijepl.2015v10n5a572
7.
ChirichelloM. (1999). Building capacity for change: Transformational leadership for school principals. In: Annual International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Conference, San Antonio, TX, January 3–6, ED 432037.
8.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
9.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
10.
DabkeD. (2016). Impact of leader’s emotional intelligence and transformational behavior on perceived leadership effectiveness: A multiple source view. Business Perspectives & Research, 4, 27–40. doi:10.1177/2278533715605433
11.
DrysdaleL.GurrD.GoodeH. (2016). Dare to make a difference: Successful principals who explore the potential of their role. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 44, 37–53.
12.
EvansR. (1996). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.BorgW. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
GreenR. L.CooperT. (2012). An identification of the most preferred dispositions of effective school leaders. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 26, 55–76.
15.
HausermanC. P.StickS. L. (2013). The leadership teachers want from principals: Transformational. Canadian Journal of Education, 36, 184–203.
16.
HussainM. A.HaiderS. Z.AhmedI.AliS. (2016). School principals as effective change agents: A study of essential skills and attributes. Journal of Educational Research (1027-9776), 19, 49–61.
17.
KareemJ. (2016). The influence of leadership in building a learning organization. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 7.
18.
KassE. (2013). “A Compliment is all I need”—Teachers telling principals how to promote their staff’s self-efficacy. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 59, 208–225.
19.
KhatriN. (2005). An alternative model of transformational leadership. Vision, 9, 19–26. doi:10.1177/097226290500900204
20.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
21.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (2013). Leadership practices inventory; Self (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: The Leadership Challenge.
22.
LeechD. W.FultonR. C. (2002). The leadership practices of middle and high school principals. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Summer Conference of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Burlington, VT.
23.
LeoneS.WarnimontC.ZimmermanJ. (2009). New roles for the principal of the future. American Secondary Education, 37, 86–96.
24.
MarzanoR. J.WatersT.McNultyB. A. (2005). School leadership that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
25.
McKinneyC. L.LabatM. B.Jr.LabatC. A. (2015). Traits possessed by principals who transform school culture in national blue ribbon schools. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 19, 52–166.
26.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
MoosungL. (2016). The changing nature of school principals’ work: Lessons and future directions for school leadership research. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management (CCEAM)), 44, 129.
28.
OnoratoM. (2013). Transformational leadership style in the educational sector: An empirical study of corporate managers and educational leaders. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17, 33–47.
29.
OumthanomP. (2001). Principal leadership behaviors: Differences in perceptions(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Illinois State University, Normal, IL.
30.
PughA. G.FillingimJ. G.BlackbournJ. M.BunchD.ThomasC. (2011). Faculty validation of the leadership practices inventory with secondary school principals. National Forum of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal, 28, 4–11.
31.
QuinnJ.DerisA.BischoffG.JohnsonJ. T. (2015). Comparison of transformational leadership practices: Implications for school districts and principal preparation. Journal of Leadership Education, 14, 71–85.
32.
SağnakM. (2010). The relationship between transformational school leadership and ethical climate. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10, 1135–1152.
33.
SengeP. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Rev. and updated ed.). New York, NY: Doubleday/Currency.
34.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
SteinL. (2016). Schools need leaders—Not managers: It’s time for a paradigm shift. Journal of Leadership Education, 15, 21–30. doi:1012806/V15/I2/I3
36.
VelascoI.EdmonsonS. L.SlateJ. R. (2012). Principal leadership behaviors and school climate: A conceptual analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 6, 315–336.
