The teacher evaluation process provides opportunity for instructional feedback and teacher improvement, but also may influence the beliefs teachers have about the quality of their own work and their confidence levels as a teacher. Self-efficacy plays a vital role in determining teacher effectiveness and the students‘ academic experience, but little is known about the impact the teacher evaluation process has on teacher self-efficacy. Interview data from 28 high school teachers indicated that the pre-observation meeting has potential to significantly benefit teachers. In addition, feedback from administrators that included both strengths and weaknesses during the post-observation phase seemed to have the most influence on teachers’ self-confidence. Implications of this study's findings were provided and may be useful for administrators to conduct teacher evaluations in a manner that serves to enhance teacher self-efficacy.
AkkuzuN. (2014). The role of different types of feedback in the reciprocal interaction of teaching performance and self-efficacy belief. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 36–66.
2.
Al-AlwanA. F., & MahasnehA. M. (2014). Teachers‘ self-efficacy as determinant of students’ attitudes toward school: A study at the school level. Review of European Studies, 6(1), 171–179.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
4.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
5.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
6.
BanduraA. (1994). Self-efficacy. In RamachaudranV. S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in H. Friedman [Ed.], Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998).
7.
BrandtC., MathersC., OlivaM., Brown-SimsM., & HessJ. (2007). Examining district guidance to schools on teacher evaluation policies in the Midwest Region. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.Institute of Educational Sciences.
8.
ColadarciT., & BretonW. A. (1997). Teacher efficacy, supervision, and the special education resource-room teacher. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(4), 230–239.
9.
CorbinJ., & StraussA. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
10.
DamanikE., & AldridgeJ. M. (2017). Transformational leadership and its impact on school climate and teachers self-efficacy in Indonesian High Schools. Journal of School Leadership, 27, 269–296.
11.
DanielsonC. (2011). Evaluations that help teachers learn. The Effective Educator, 68(4), 35–39.
12.
DonaldsonM. L. (2013). Principals' approaches to cultivating teacher effectiveness: Constraints and opportunities in hiring, assigning, evaluating and developing teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 838–882.
13.
DonaldsonM. L., & PapayJ. P. (2015). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In LaddH. F., & GoertzM. E. (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 174–193). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T., MarshallP. L., & McCullochA. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155.
15.
DweckC. S. (2007). The perils and promises of praise. ASCD, 65(2), 34–39.
16.
EbmeierH. (2003). How supervision influences teacher efficacy and commitment: An investigation of a path model. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(2), 110–141.
17.
GoddardR., GoddardY., KimE. S., & MillerR. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the role of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.
18.
GoddardR., WayneH. K., & Woolfolk-HoyA. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479–507.
19.
GoldhammerR. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
KlassenR., & TzeV. (2014). Teachers' self-efficacy, personality and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review12(6), 59–76.
22.
KraftM. A., & GilmourA. F. (2017). Revisiting the widget effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 234–249.
23.
LaddH. (2017). No child left behind: A deeply flawed federal policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(2), 461–469.
24.
MarzanoR., FrontierT., & LivingstonD. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching.Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
25.
MojaveziA., & TamizM. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students' motivation and achievement. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 483–491.
26.
MorrisD., UsherE., & ChenJ. (2017). Re-conceptualizing the sources of teaching self-efficacy: A critical review of emerging literature. Educational Psychological Review29, 795–833.
27.
MorseJ. M., BarrettM., MayanM., OlsonK., & SpiersJ. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.
28.
NolanJ., & HooverL. A. (2005). Teacher supervision and evaluation: Theory into practice.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
29.
PajakE. (2001). Clinical supervision in a standards-based environment: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(3), 233–243.
30.
PhanN. T. T., & LockeT. (2015). Sources of self-efficacy of Vietnamese EFL teachers: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 52, 73–82.
31.
PanY. H. (2014). Relationships among teachers‘ self-efficacy and students’ motivation, atmosphere, and satisfaction in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33(1), 68–92.
32.
RodriguezS., RegueiroB., BlasR., ValleA., PineiroI., & CerezoR. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and its relationship with students' affective and motivational variables in higher education. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 7(2), 107–120.
33.
RossJ. A., & GrayP. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 798–822.
34.
SaldañaJ. (2009). An introduction to codes and coding. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, 1–31.
35.
SchunkD., & PajaresF. (2009). Self efficacy theory. In Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 35–54). New York: Routledge.
36.
SkaalvikE. M., & SkaalvikS. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1059–1069.
37.
SteinK. C., MacalusoM., & StanulisR. N. (2017). The interplay between principal leadership and teacher leader efficacy. Journal of School Leadership, 26(6), 1002.
SuttonC. M. (2008). Status of superintendent pipeline. School Administrator, 65(4), 21.
40.
TaiD. W. S., HuY. C., WangR., & ChenJ. L. (2012). What is the impact of teacher self-efficacy on the student learning outcome?3rd WIETE Annual Conference of Engineering and Technology Education. Retrieved from http://www.wiete.com.au/conferences/3wiete/Pages/15-Tai-D.pdf
41.
TaylorE., & TylerJ. (2012). The effect of evaluation on teacher performance. American Economic Review, 102(7), 3628–3651.
TochT., & RothmanR. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Education Sector Reports.
44.
Tschannen-MoranM., & GareisC. R. (2007). Cultivating principals' self-efficacy: Supports that matter. Journal of School Leadership, 17(1), 89.
45.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyA. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956.
46.
Tschannen-MoranM., & McMasterP. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245.
47.
Tschannen-MoranM., & JohnsonD. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers' self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 751–761.
48.
WahlstromK. L., & Seashore-LouisK. (2008). Teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.
49.
WeisbergD., SextonS., MulhernJ., KeelingD., SchunckJ., PalciscoA., & MorganK. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://tntp.org/assets/documents/TheWidgetEffect_2nd_ed.pdf
50.
YoonK. S., DuncanT., Wen-Yun LeeS., ScarlossB., & ShapleyK. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest.
51.
ZeeM., & KoomenH. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Education Research, 86(4), 981–1015.
