This investigation examines the impact teacher protection and principal role ambiguity have on elementary school student bullying. Data were collected from 1,554 teachers and 198 campus administrators from 104 elementary schools in Texas. HLM analyses are employed to identify the effect that teacher protection, administrator role ambiguity, school size, and socioeconomic status have on student bullying. The findings indicate when teachers espouse a belief in protecting students from bullying and administrators clearly understand their roles, bullying incidents decrease. Thus, enhancing teacher protection and administrator role clarity may serve as useful tools to help educators reduce incidents of school bullying.
AdamsC. M., ForsythP. B., DollarhideE., MiskellR., & WareJ. (2015). Self-regulatory climate: A social resource for student regulation and achievement. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–28.
2.
AllenK. P. (2010). Classroom management, bullying, and teacher practices. Professional Educator, 34(1), 1–15.
3.
AtikG., & GüneriO. Y. (2013). Bullying and victimization: Predictive role of individual, parental, and academic factors. School Psychology International, 34(6), 658–673.
4.
BailesL. P., & HoyW. K. (2014). Designing school contexts for success: Paternalism or libertarianism?. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(1), 484–497.
5.
BaumanS., & Del RioA. (2006). Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 291–331.
6.
BaumanS., RigbyK., & HoppaK. (2008). US teachers‘ and school counsellors’ strategies for handling school bullying incidents. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 837–856.
7.
BeatyL. A., & AlexeyevE. B. (2008). The problem of school bullies: What the research tells us. Adolescence, 43(169), 1–11.
8.
BerkowitzR., & BenbenishtyR. (2012). Perceptions of teachers' support, safety, and absence from school because of fear among victims, bullies, and bully-victims. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(1), 67–74.
9.
BradshawC.P., SawyerA.L., & O'BrennanL.M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: Perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361–382.
10.
BrofenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
CassidyW., BrownK., & JacksonM. (2012). ‘Under the radar’: Educators and cyberbullying in schools. School Psychology International, 33(1), 520–532.
Conners-BurrowN. A., JohnsonD. L., Whiteside-MansellL., McKelveyL., & GargusR. A. (2009). Adults matter: Protecting children from the negative impacts of bullying. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 593–604.
14.
CooperM.A. (2011). New study links bullying to lower high school GPAs – especially among Hispanics. The Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education, 22(3), 28–29.
15.
CornellD., HuangF., GregoryA., & FanX. (2013). Perceived prevalence of teasing and bullying predicts high school dropout rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 138–149.
16.
CowieH., & JenniferD. (2008). New perspectives on bullying.Berkshire: Open University Press.
17.
CraigW., HendersonK., & MurphyJ. G. (2000). Prospective teachers' attitudes toward bullying and victimization. School Psychology International, 21(1), 5–21.
18.
CraigW., & PeplerD. (2003). Identifying and targeting risk for involvement in bullying and victimization. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(1), 577–582.
19.
CranstonN., EhrichL., & BillotJ. (2003). The secondary school principalship in Australia and New Zealand: An investigation of changing roles. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 2(3), 159–188.
20.
CreswellJ. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
DennyS., PetersonE. R., StuartJ., UtterJ., BullenP., FlemingT., & MilfontT. (2015). bystander intervention, bullying, and victimization: A multilevel analysis of New Zealand high schools. Journal of School Violence, 14(3), 245–272.
22.
Department for Children Schools and Families. (2007). Safe to learn: Embedding anti-bullying work in schools.London: Department for Children Schools and Families.
23.
DeVellisR.F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications.Los Angeles: Sage.
24.
ErtesvågS. K., & RolandE. (2015). Professional cultures and rates of bullying. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 26(2), 195–214.
25.
EspelageD., GreenH., & PolaninJ. (2012). Willingness to intervene in bullying episodes among middle school students: Individual and peer- group influences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(1), 776–801.
26.
FlaspohlerP. D., ElfstromJ. L., VanderzeeK.L.O., SinkH. E., & BirchmeierZ. (2009). Stand by me: The effects of peer and teacher support in mitigating the impact of bullying on quality of life. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 636–649.
27.
FlygareE., GillP. E., & JohanssonB. (2013). Lessons from a concurrent evaluation of eight antibullying programs used in Sweden. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(2), 170–189.
28.
FlyntS. W., & MortonR. (2008). Alabama elementary principals' perceptions of bullying. Education, 129(2), 187–191.
29.
GlewG.M., FanM.Y., KatonW., RivaraF.P., & KernicM.A. (2005). Bullying, psychosocial adjustment, and academic performance in elementary school. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 159(11), 1026–1031.
30.
GoddardR. D., & SkrlaL. (2006). The influence of school social composition on teachers' collective efficacy beliefs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 216–235.
31.
GoldbaumS., CraigW., PeplerD., & ConnolyJ. (2003). Developmental trajectories of victimization: Identifying risk and protective factors. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 139–156.
32.
GoldweberA, WaasdorpT.E., & BradshawC.P. (2013). Examining associations between race, urbanicity, and patterns of bullying involvement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 206–219.
33.
GorylO., Neilsen-HewettC., & SwellerN. (2013). Teacher education, teaching experience and bullying policies: Links with early childhood teachers' perceptions and attitudes to bullying. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 38(2), 32–40.
34.
GottfredsonD., & DiPietroS. (2011). School size, social capital, and student victimization. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 69–89.
35.
HamreB., & PiantaR. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(1), 625–638.
36.
HanishL., & GuerraN. (2002). A longitudinal analysis of patterns of adjustment following peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 14(1), 69–89.
37.
HastingsR. P., & BhamM. S. (2003). The relationship between student behavior patterns and teacher burnout. School Psychology International, 24(1), 115–127.
38.
JaskyteK. (2005). The impact of organizational socialization tactics on role ambiguity and role conflict of newly hired social workers. Administration in Social Work, 29(4), 69–87.
39.
KearneyW.S., & HerringtonD.E. (2013). The role of inquiry in closing the gap between university experience and assistant principal career transition through simulated realistic job preview. Educational Leadership Review, 14(1), 69–82.
40.
KellowayE. K., and BarlingJ. (1990). Item content versus item wording: Disentangling role conflict and role ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology75(6), 738–742.
41.
KhamisV. (2015). Bullying among school-age children in the greater Beirut area: Risk and protective factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 39(1), 137–146.
42.
KirkpatrickL., LincolnF., & MorrowL. R. (2006). Assessment of a collaborative teacher preparation program: Voices of interns. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(1), 36–41.
43.
Kochenderfer-LaddB., & WardropJ. (2001). Chronicity and instability of children's peer victimization experiences as predictors of loneliness and social satisfaction trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 134–151.
44.
MayerG. R. (2002). Behavioral strategies to reduce school violence. Child & Family Behavior Therapy24(1/2), 83–100.
45.
MenesniE., FonziA., & SmithP. K. (2002). Attributions of meanings to terms related to bullying: A comparison between teachers‘ and pupils’ perspectives in Italy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17(4), 393–406.
46.
MitchellM., BradshawC., & LeafP. (2010). Student and teacher perceptions of school climate: A multilevel exploration of patterns of discrepancy. Journal of School Health, 80(6), 271–279.
47.
MouttapaM., ValentT., GallaherP., RohrbachL.A., & UngerJ. B. (2004). Social network predictors of bullying and victimization. Adolescence, 39(1), 315–335.
48.
MyersS., & PiantaR. (2008). Developmental commentary: Individual and contextual influences on student-teacher relationships and children's early problem behaviors. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(1), 600–608.
49.
NakamotoJ., & SchwartzD. (2010). Is peer victimization associated with academic achievement? A meta-analytic review. Social Development, 19(1), 221–242.
50.
NanselT. R., OverpeckM., PillaR. S., RuanW. J., Simons-MortonB., & ScheidtP. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(1), 2094–2100.
51.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Student reports of bullying: Results from the 2015 school crime supplement to the national crime victimization survey. Retrieved December 4, 2017 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017015.pdf.
OlweusD., & LimberS. P. (2010). Bullying in school: Evaluation and dissemination of the Olweus bullying prevention program. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(1), 124–134.
54.
OrpinasP., HorneA. M., & StaniszewskiD. (2003). School bullying: Changing the problem by changing the school. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 431–444.
55.
PerrenS., & AlsakerF. (2006). Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully-victims, and bullies in kindergarten. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(1), 45–57.
56.
RaskauskasJ.L., GregoryJ., HarveyS.T., RifshanaF., & EvansI.M. (2010). Bullying among primary school children in New Zealand: Relationships with prosocial behavior and classroom climate. Educational Research, 52(1), 1–13.
57.
RigbyK., & BagshawD. (2003). Prospects of adolescent students collaborating with teachers in addressing issues of bullying and conflict in schools. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 535–546.
58.
RizzoJ., HouseR., & LirtzmanS. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(1), 150–63.
RuegerS.Y., MaleckiC.K., & DemarayM.K. (2011). Stability of peer victimization in early adolescence: Effects of timing and duration. Journal of School Psychology, 49(1), 443–464.
61.
SchumannL., CraigW., & RosuA. (2014). Power differentials in bullying: Individuals in a community context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(5), 846–865.
62.
SchwartzD., GormanA. H., DodgeK. A., PettitG. S., & BatesJ. E. (2008). Friendships with peers who are low or high in aggression as moderators of the link between peer victimization and declines in academic functioning. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(1), 719–730.
63.
SealsD. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38(1), 735–747.
64.
SmithP.A., & BirneyL. (2005). The organizational trust of elementary schools and dimensions of student bullying. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(6), 469–485.
65.
SmithP.A., & HoyW.K. (2004). Teachers' perceptions of student bullying: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of School Leadership, 14, 308–326.
66.
SmithP.A., and KearneyW. S. (2017). Bullying from streets to schools: Information for those who care.Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
67.
SmithP. K., & ShuS. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying: Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood, 7(2), 193–212.
68.
SmithP.K., SmithC., OsbornR., & SamaraM. (2008). A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: progress and limitations. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24(1), 1–12.
69.
SnijderT., and BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.London: Sage Publishers.
70.
SouranderA., HelstalaL., HeleniusH., & PihaJ. (2000). Persistence of bullying from childhood to adolescence: A longitudinal 8-year follow-up study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 873–881.
71.
SoutterA., & McKenzieA. (2000). The use and effects of anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies in Australian schools. School Psychology International, 21(1), 96–105.
72.
StrømI., ThoresenS., Wentzel-LarsenT., SagatunÅ., & DybG. (2014). A prospective study of the potential moderating role of social support in preventing marginalization among individuals exposed to bullying and abuse in junior high school. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 43(10), 1642–1657.
73.
SugaiG., & HomerR. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 23–50.
74.
SwearerS. M., & EspelageD. L. (2004). Introduction: A social-ecological framework of bullying among youth. In EspelageD. L., & SwearerS. M. (Eds.), Bullying in schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 1–12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
75.
SwearerS. M., & EspelageD. L. (2010). Expanding the social-ecological framework of bullying among youth: Lessons learned from the past and directions for the future. In SwearerS. M., & EspelageD. L. (eds.) Bullying in North American Schools.London: Routledge.
76.
SwearerS. M., SongS. Y., CaryP. T., EagleJ. W., & MickelsonW. T. (2001). Psychosocial correlates in bullying and victimization: The relationship between depression, anxiety, and bully/victim status. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(1), 95–122.
ThijsJ., & VerkuytenM. (2008). Peer victimization and academic achievement in a multiethnic sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 754–764.
79.
TwemlowS. W., FonagyP., SaccoF. C., & BrethourJ. R. (2006). Teachers who bully students: A hidden trauma. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 52(3), 187–198.
80.
TysonK. (2000). Using the teacher-student relationship to help children diagnosed as hyperactive: An application of intrapsychic humanism. Child & Youth Care Forum, 29(1), 265–289.
81.
U.S. Department of Education (2016). Trends in bullying at school among students ages 12 to 18. Retrieved December 4, 2017 from: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016004.pdf.
WangJ., IannottiR.J., & NanselT.R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(1), 368–375.
85.
WhitneyI., & SmithP.K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35(1), 3–25.
86.
WolkeD., WoodsS., StanfordK., & SchultzH. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92(4), 673–696.
