The 2015 federal Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) affords states flexibility in adopting accountability measures that assess opportunity to learn, and requires that state and district leaders use evidence-based interventions to address any inequities. For English learners (ELs) at the secondary level, one important measure of opportunity to learn is access to and completion of rigorous, college preparatory coursework. Drawing from ESSA's definition of “evidence-based,” which aligns closely with requirements for EL programs outlined by Castañeda, we propose course taking as a valid and reliable statewide indicator of student success, and offer recommendations for local interventions that would support secondary ELs’ opportunity to learn
AdamsonK., SantauA., & LeeO. (2013). The impact of professional development on elementary teachers’ strategies for teaching science with diverse student groups in urban elementary schools. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 553–571.
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited-paths to degree completion from high school through college.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3.
AldanaU., & MayerA. P. (2014). The international baccalaureate: A college preparatory pathway for heritage language speakers and immigrant youth. In CallahanR. M., & GandaraP. C. (Eds.), The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the U.S. labor market (Vol. 99, pp. 261–285). Avedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
4.
BartlettL., & GarcíaO. (2011). Additive schooling in subtractive times: Bilingual education and Dominican immigrant youth in the heights.Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
5.
BunchG. C. (2013). Pedagogical language knowledge: Preparing mainstream teachers for English learners in the new standards era. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 298–341.
6.
CallahanR. M. (2013). The English learner dropout dilemma: Multiple risks and multiple resources (pp. 60). Santa Barbara, CA: California Dropout Research Project Report (CDRP).
7.
CallahanR. M., & GándaraP. C. (2004). On nobody's agenda: Improving English language learners’ access to higher education. In SadowskiM. (Ed.), Immigrant and second language students: Lessons from research and best practice (pp. 107–127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
8.
CallahanR. M., & HumphriesM. (2016). Undermatched? School-based linguistic status, college going, and the immigrant advantage. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 263–295.
9.
CallahanR. M., & ShifrerD. (2016). Equitable access for secondary English learner students: Course taking as evidence of el program effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(3), 463–496.
10.
CallahanR. M., WilkinsonL., & MullerC. (2010). Academic achievement and course-taking among language minority youth in U.S. Schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84–117.
11.
CallahanR. M., WilkinsonL., MullerC., & FriscoM. L. (2009). ESL placement and schools: Effects on immigrant achievement. Educational Policy, 23(2), 355–384.
12.
Castaneda v. Pickard, 648 F.2d 989, 1006–07 (5th Cir. 1981V).
13.
CastellónM., CheukT., GreeneR., Mercado-GarcíaD., SantosM., SkarinR. (2015). Schools to learn from: How six high schools graduate English language learners college and career ready: Stanford Graduate School of Education, for Carnegie Corporation of New York.
14.
CelicC., & SeltzerK. (2011). Translanguaging: A CUNY-NYSIEB guide for educators.New York, NY: The Graduate Center, The City University of New York: CUNY-NYSIEB.
15.
Darling-HammondL., BaeS., Cook-HarveyC., LamL., MercerC., PodolsklyA. (2016). Pathways to new accountability through the Every Student Succeeds Act.Stanford, CA: Learning Policy Institute and Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.
16.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), Pub.L. 114–95 C.F.R. (2015).
17.
FaltisC., & AriasM. B. (2012). Research-based reform in Arizona: Whose evidence counts for applying the Castañeda test to structured English immersion models? In FaltisC., & AriasM. B. (Eds.), Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI (Vol. 86, pp. 21–38). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
18.
GamoranA., & HanniganE. C. (2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college- preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 241–254.
19.
GándaraP. C., RumbergerR. W., Maxwell-JollyJ., & CallahanR. M. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(36).
20.
GarcíaO., & WeiL. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
GuskeyT. R., & YoonK. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495–500.
22.
HaxtonC., & O'DayJ. (2015). Improving equity and access in Fresno: Lessons from a K12–higher education partnership.Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
23.
HopkinsM. (2013). Building on our teaching assets: The unique pedagogical contributions of bilingual educators. Bilingual Research Journal, 36(3), 350–370.
24.
HopkinsM., Martinez-WenzlM., AldanaU. S., & GandaraP. C. (2013). Cultivating capital: Latino newcomer young men in a U.S. urban high school. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 44(3), 286–303.
25.
HopkinsM., & SchutzK. (2016). Bilingual teacher leadership: Expanding notions of instructional leadership for English learners. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
26.
IngersollR. M., & PerdaD. (2009). The mathematics and science teacher shortage: Fact and myth.University of Pennsylvania: The Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
27.
JarskyK. M., McDonoughP. M., & NuñezA.-M. (2009). Establishing a college culture in secondary schools through P-20 collaboration: A case study. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 8(4), 357–373.
28.
JussimL., & EcclesJ. S. (1992). Teacher expectations: n. Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 947–961.
29.
JussimL., & HarberK. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2), 131–155.
30.
KellyS., & CarbonaroW. (2012). Curriculum tracking and teacher expectations: Evidence from discrepant course taking models. Social Psychology of Education, 15(3), 271–294.
31.
Lau v. Nichols 414 U.S. 563 (1974).
32.
LeeO., & BuxtonC. A. (2013). Integrating science and English proficiency for English language learners. Theory Into Practice, 52(1), 36–42.
33.
LeeO., QuinnH., & ValdesG. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.
34.
LópezF., McEneaneyE., & NieswandtM. (2015). Language instruction educational programs and academic achievement of Latino English learners: Considerations for states with changing demographics. American Journal of Education, 121(3), 417–450.
35.
MacSwanJ., & RolstadK. (2006). How language proficiency tests mislead us about ability: Implications for English language learner placement in special education. The Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2304–2328.
36.
MartínezR. A. (2010). “Spanglish” as literacy tool: Toward an understanding of the potential role of Spanish-English code-switching in the development of academic literacy. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(2), 124–149.
37.
MayerA. P. (2008). Expanding opportunities for high academic achievement: An International Baccalaureate diploma program in an urban high school. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(2), 202–235.
38.
MeltzerJ., & HamannE. T. (2005). Meeting the literacy development needs of adolescent English language learners through content-area learning: Part II-focus on classroom teaching and learning strategies.Providence, RI: Education Alliance at Brown University.
39.
MichaelA., AndradeN., & BartlettL. (2007). Figuring “success” in a bilingual high school. The Urban Review, 39(2), 167–189.
40.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2002). Schools and staffing survey, 1999–2000: Overview of the data for public, private, public charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs elementary and secondary schools.Washington D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
41.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2012). Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS), Public teacher data file 2011–12.
42.
NuñezA.-M., Rios-AguilarC., KannoY., & FloresS. M. (2016). English learners and their transition to postsecondary education. In PaulsenB. M. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 41–90). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
43.
SpielhagenF. R. (2006). Closing the achievement gap in math: The long-term effects of eighth-grade Algebra. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(1), 34–59.
44.
UmanskyI. M., & ReardonS. F. (2014). Reclassification patterns among Latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 879–912.
