Research suggests effective professional learning communities (PLCs) enhance teacher collaboration and student achievement. Within-school variation in PLC processes, however, is underexplored. This study highlights differences in teacher behavior and teams’ perceptions of principal leadership in well-functioning teams versus less well-functioning ones. Analysis of interviews of principals and team members showed teams differed in intensity of analysis of student work and the level of changes in instructional practices. High-functioning teams felt supported by the principal while the less well-functioning teams did not. These findings suggest the need for more active principal facilitation of PLCs to achieve full benefits.
AndrewsD., & LewisM. (2007). Transforming practice from within: The power of the professional learning community. In StollL., & LouisK.S. (Eds.) Professional learning communities.Maidenhead, UK: Open University.
2.
BolamR., McMahonA., StollL., ThomasS., & WallaceM. (2005). Creating and sustaining professional learning communities. Research Report Number 637. London, England: General Teaching Council for England, Department for Education and Skills.
3.
BoydV., & HordS. M. (1994). Principals and the new paradigm: Schools as learning communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
4.
BrykA. S. (2015). Accelerating how we learn to improve. Educational Researcher, 44(9), 467–477.
5.
BrykA., CamburnE., & LouisK. S. (1999). Professional communities in Chicago elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(Suppl.), 751–781.
6.
ChrispeelsJ. H., BurkeP. H., JohnsonP., & DalyA. J. (2008). Aligning mental models of district and school leadership teams for reform coherence. Education and Urban Society, 40(6), 730–750.
De NeveD., DevosG., & TuytensM. (2015). The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction. Teacher and Teacher Education, 47, 30–41.
9.
DuFourR., DuFourR., & EakerR. (2008). Revisiting Professional Learning Communities at Work: New Insights for Improving Schools.Bloomington, Indiana: Solution Tree.
10.
DukeD. L. (2006). What We Know and Don't Know about Improving Low-Performing Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 729–734.
11.
ErautM. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence.London: Falmer Press.
12.
GrayJ.A. (2011). Professional learning communities and the role of enabling school structures and trust (Published doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
13.
GrayJ. A., & SummersR. (2015). International professional learning communities: The role of enabling school structures, trust, and collective efficacy. The International Education Journal, 14(3), 61–75.
14.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement.New York: Routledge.
15.
HippK. A., & HuffmanJ. B. (2010). Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.
16.
HippK. A., HuffmanJ. B., PankakeA. M., & OlivierD. F. (2008). Sustaining professional learning communities: Case studies. Journal of Educational Change, 9(2), 173–195.
17.
HordS. M., (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement.Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
18.
HordS. M., & SommersW. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities.Corwin Press and SAGE.
19.
HughesT. A., & KritsonisW. A. (2007). Professional learning communities and the positive effects on student achievement. The Lamar University Electronic Journal of Student Research.
20.
JohnsonP. E., & ChrispeelsJ. H. (2010). Linking the central office and its schools for reform. (5), 738–775.
21.
KirkmanB. L., & RosenB. (2000). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences to team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58–75.
LeeJ. C., ZhangZ., & YinH. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820–830.
24.
LeithwoodK. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.
LeithwoodK., LouisK. S., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). Review of research how leadership influences student learning. Retrieved October 15, 2015 from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/Pages/a-review.
27.
LevineT. H. (2011). Experienced teachers and school reform. Improving Schools, 14(1), 30–47.
28.
LittleJ. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325–340.
29.
LittleJ. W. (2003). Inside teacher community: Representations of classroom practice. Teacher's College Record, 105(6), 913–945.
30.
LomasC., HofmanR. H., & BoskerR. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement: a meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 121–148.
31.
LouisK. S., KruseS. D., & MarksH. M. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In NewmanF.M. & Associates (Eds.), Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
LouisK. S., & MarksH. M. (1998). Does professional community affect the classroom?American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.
33.
LouisK.S., MarksH.M., & KruseS. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.
34.
LowreyS. (2014). A mixed-methods study of principal efficacy and transformational leadership in Canada. International Studies in Educational Administration, 42(3), 35–54.
35.
McLaughlinM. W., & TalbertJ. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning. (Stanford, CA, Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching).
36.
MilesM.B., HubermanA.M., SaldanaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
MorrisseyM.S. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration.Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
38.
NewmannF.M., & WehlageG. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
39.
NewmannF., RutterR., & SmithM. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62(4), 221–238.
40.
O'ReillyC., & ChatmanJ. (1996). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157–200.
41.
PhillipsJ. (2003). Powerful learning: Creating learning communities in urban school reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(3), 240–258.
42.
PrintyS. M., MarksH. M., & BowersA. J. (2009). Integrated leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 504–532.
RossJ. A., & GrayP. (2006). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organizational values. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179–199.
45.
ScribnerJ. P., CockrellK. S., CockrellD. H., & ValentineJ. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 130–160.
46.
SengeP. M. (1990). The fifth discipline.New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
47.
SengeP. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
48.
Shapira-LishchinskyO., & TsemachS. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a mediator between teachers’ perceptions of authentic leadership and their withdrawal and citizenship behaviors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 675–712.
49.
SomechA. (2005). Teachers’ personal and team empowerment and their relations to organizational outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 237–266.
StollL., BolamR., McMahonA., WallaceM., & ThomasS. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.
52.
StollL., & LouiseK. S. (2008). Professional learning communities.New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
SzczesiulS., & HuizengaJ. (2014). The burden of leadership: Exploring the principal's role in teacher collaboration. Improving Schools, 17(2), 176–191.
54.
TalbertJ. E. (2010). Professional communities at the crossroads in HargreavesA. (Ed.) The Second International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 555–571). International Handbooks of Education, Volume 23, Dordrecht, Springer.
55.
ThoonenE., SleegersP., OortF., & PeetsmaT. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 441–460.
56.
VescioV., RossD., & AdamsA. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91.
57.
VoelkelR. H.Jr. (2011). A case study of the relationship between collective efficacy and professional learning communities.University of California, San Diego and California State University, San Marcos.
58.
VoelkelR. H.Jr., & ChrispeelsJ. H. (2017). Understanding the link between professional learning communities and teacher collective efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1–22
59.
WahlstromK. L., & LouisK. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.
