This study examined the relationships between principals’ leadership, school climate, and teachers’ sense of self-efficacy. Drawing on existing scales, this study examined six aspects of principal leadership (professional interaction, participatory decision-making, individual support, intellectual stimulation and moral perspective) and four school climate factors (staff collegiality, goal consensus, work pressure, resource adequacy, and staff freedom). The participants included 604 Indonesian teachers drawn from 27 high schools. The data were analysed using Structural Equation Modeling. The results indicated statistically significant and positive relationships between leadership style, school climate, and teacher self-efficacy. With the exception of individual support, the relationships between principal leadership and teacher self-efficacy were largely indirect, mediated through staff collegiality and goal consensus.
Abu-DuhouI. (2003). School-based management.Jakarta, Indonesia: Logos Wacana Ilmu.
2.
AldridgeJ. M., & FraserB. J. (2016). Teacher's views of the school climate and its relationship with teacher self-efficacy and work satisfaction. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 291–307.
3.
AldridgeJ. M., Ala'iK., & FraserB. J. (2016). Relationships between school climate and adolescent students’ self-reports of ethnic and moral identity. Learning Environments Research, 19, 1–16.
4.
AldridgeJ. M., LaugkschR. D. C., & FraserB. J. (2006). School-level environment and outcomes-based education in South Africa. Learning Environments Research, 9(2), 123–147.
5.
AndersonC. S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 368–420.
6.
AsifF. (2011). Estimating the impact of Denison's (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate?: A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Journal of Business Research, 64, 454–459.
7.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
8.
BarclayD., HigginsC., & ThompsonR. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and uses as an illustration. Technology Studies, 2, 285–309.
9.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation.New York, NY: Free Press.
10.
BassB. M., & AvolioB. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of Europian Industrial Training, 14(1), 21–27.
11.
BassB. M., & AvolioB. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
BathR. S. (2006). Improving relationships within the schoolhouse. Improving Professional Practice, 63(6), 8–13.
13.
BergmanJ. Z., RentschJ. R., SmallE. E., DavenportS. W., & BergmanS. M. (2012). The shared leadership process in decision-making teams. Journal of Social Psychology, 152(1), 17–42.
14.
BoglerR. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 662–683.
15.
BrislinR. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.
16.
BrowneM. W., & CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A., & LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
BrookoverW. B., SchweitzerJ. H., SchneiderJ. M., BeadyC. H., FloodP. K., & WisenbakerM. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 301–318.
18.
BuckleyJ., SchneiderM., & ShangY. (2005). Fix it and they might stay: School facility quality and teacher retention in Washington, D.C. Teachers College Record, 107(5), 1107–1123.
19.
ButtG., & LanceA. (2005). Secondary teacher workload and job satisfaction: Do successful strategies for change exist?Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 33, 401–422.
20.
ButterworthB., & WeinsteinR. S. (1996). Enhancing motivational opportunity in elementary Schooling: A case study of the ecology of principal leadership. Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 57–80.
21.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22.
CairnsI. G. (1987). Behavior problems. In DunkinM. J. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 446–452). New York, NY: Pergamon.
23.
CalikT., SezginF., KavgaciH., & CagatayK. A. (2012). Examination of relationships between instructional leadership of school principals and self-efficacy of teachers and collective teacher efficacy. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(4), 2498–2504.
24.
ChengY. C. (1994). Principal's leadership as a critical factor for school performance: Evidence from multi-levels of primary schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 299–317.
25.
CohenJ. (2001). Social and emotional education: Core principles and practices. In CohenJ. (Ed.), Caring classrooms/intelligent schools: The social emotional education of young children (pp. 3–29). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
26.
CollieR. J., ShapkaJ. D., & PerryN. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189–1204.
27.
deJungJ., & DuckworthK. (1986). High school teachers and their students’ attendance: Final Report.Eugene: University of Oregon Center for Education Policy and Management, College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED266557).
28.
DemirK. (2008). Transformational leadership and collective efficacy: The moderating roles of collaborative culture and teachers’ self-efficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 93–112.
29.
DiamantopoulosA. A., & SiguawJ. A. (Eds.). (2000). Introducing LISREL.London: SAGE.
30.
DinhamS. (1995). School climate and leadership: Research into three secondary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 33(4), 36–58.
31.
Drago-SeversonE. (2012). New opportunities for principal leadership: Shaping school climates for enhanced teacher development. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1–44.
32.
FernetC., GuayF., SenécalC., & AustinS. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 514–525.
33.
FisherD. L., & FraserB. J. (1990). Validity and use of the School-Level Environment Questionnaire.Perth: Curtin University of Technology.
34.
FisherD. L., & FraserB. J. (1991). School climate and teacher professional development. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 19, 261–271.
35.
FletcherB., & PayneR. L. (1982). Levels of reported stressors and strains amongst school teachers: Some UK data. Educational Review, 34, 267–278.
36.
FornellC., & LarkerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.
37.
GoddardY. L., GoddardR. D., & Tschannen-MoranM. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896.
38.
GoughH. G. (1990). Testing for leadership with the California Psychological Inventory. In ClarkK. E., & ClarkM. B. (Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 355–379). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.
39.
GraysonJ., & AlvarezH. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1349–1363.
40.
HairJ. F., BlackW. C., BabinB. J., & AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41.
HallP., & SimeralA. (2008). Building teachers’ capacity for success.Virginia, USA: Associaton for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
42.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110.
43.
HeywardM. O., CannonR. A., & Sarjono (2011). Implementing school-based management in Indonesia: Impact and lessons learned. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 3(3), 371–388.
44.
HippK. A., & BredesonP. V. (1995). Exploring connections between teacher efficacy and principals’ leadership behavior. Journal of School Leadership, 5, 136–150.
45.
HouseR. J., WoyckeJ., & FodorE. (1986). Research contrasting the motives and effects of reputed charismatic versus reputed non-charismatic U.S. presidents.Chicago: Academy of Management.
46.
HoyleR. H., & PanterA. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
HuL.-T., & BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453.
48.
HuangS.-Y.L., & FraserB. J. (2009). Science teachers’ perceptions of the school environment: Gender differences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 404–420.
49.
JarzabkowskiL. M. (2002). The social dimensions of teacher collegiality. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(2), 1–20.
50.
JohnsonW.L., JohnsonA.M., & ZimmermanK. (1996). Assessing school climate priorities: A Texas study. Clearing House, 70, 64–66.
51.
JohnsonB., & StevensJ. J. (2001). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the School-Level Environment Questionnaire (SLEQ). Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 325–344.
JudgeT. A., & BonoJ. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 751–765.
54.
KlassenR. M., BongM., UsherE. L., ChongW. H., HuanV. S., WongI. Y. F., & GeorgeuT. (2009). Exploring the valididty of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 67–76.
55.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd edition). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
56.
KurlandH., PeretzH., & Hertz-LazarowitsR. (2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediating effect of school vision. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(1), 7–30.
57.
KurtT., DuyarI, CalikT. (2012). Are we legitimate yet?: A closer look at the casual relationship mechanisms among principal leadership, teachers’ self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 71–86.
58.
LeithwoodK. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 498–518.
59.
LeithwoodK. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 679–706.
60.
LeithwoodK., BegleyP. T., & CousinsJ. B. (1992). Developing expert leadership for future schools.London: Falmer.
61.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1997). Explaining variation in teachers’ perceptions of principals’ leadership: A replication. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(4), 312–331.
62.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 451–479.
63.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227.
64.
LohwitheeW. (2010). The impact of director's leadership style and gender on secondary school climate in Bangkok Metropolis, Thailand, from http://vuir.vu.edu.au/15994/.
65.
LorsbachA. W., & JinksJ. L. (1999). Self efficacy theory and learning environment research. Learning Environments Research, 2(2), 155–167.
66.
MacKinnonD. P., LockwoodC. M., WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
67.
MarshH. W., BallaJ. R., & MacDonaldR. P. (1998). Goodness-of-ifit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 391–410.
68.
ManvellE. C. (2012). The violence continuum: Creating a safe school climate.United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield
69.
MeristoM., EisenshhmidtE. (2014). Novice teachers’ perceptions of school climate and self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Research, 67, 1–10.
70.
MichelJ. S., & LeBretonJ. M. (2011). Leadership coherence: An application of personality coherence theory to the study of leadership. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 688–694.
71.
NeumannY., & NeumannE. F. (1999). The president and the college bottom line: The role of strategic leadership styles. The International Journal of Educational Management, 13(2), 73–79.
72.
NirA. E., & KranotN. (2006). School principal's leadership style and teachers’ self efficacy. Planning and Changing, 37(3), 205–218.
73.
NunnallyJ. C., & BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
74.
ParryK. W., & Proctor-ThomsonS. B. (2002). Perceived integrity of transformational leaders in organisational settings. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 75–96.
75.
PepperK., & ThomasL. H. (2002). Making a change: The effects of the leadership role on school climate. Learning Environments Research, 2(3), 155–166.
76.
PereiraC. M. M., & GomesJ. F. S. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: Impact on organisational performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 4301–4318.
77.
RetnaK. S., & TeeN. P. (2008). The perception of staff on the effects of transformational leadership in a Singapore school. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 23(1), 64–77.
78.
RimmH., & JerusalemM. (1999). Adaptation and validation of an Estonian version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES). Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 12(3), 329–345.
79.
RossJ. A., CousinsJ. B., & GadallaT. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 385–400.
80.
RossJ. A., & GrayP. (2006). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment to organisational values: The mediating effects of collective teacher's efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 179–199.
81.
SagalaS. (2004). Manajemen berbasis sekolah dan masyarakat: Strategi memenangkan persaingan mutu [School based management and community: Strategies to win quality competition].Jakarta, Indonesia: PT Nimas Multima.
82.
SantosaP. I., WeiK. K., & ChanH. C. (2005). User involvement and user satisfaction with information-seeking activity. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(4), 361–361.
83.
SchwarzerR., BäßlerJ., KwiatekP., SchröderK., & ZhangJ. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the General Self-Efficacy scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 69–88.
84.
SchwarzerR., & JerusalemM. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In WeinmanJ., WrightS., & JohnstonM. (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
85.
SchwarzerR., MuellerJ., & GreenglassE. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 12(2), 145–161.
86.
SergiovanniT. S., & StarrattR. J. (1998). Supervision: A redefinition. (6th edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
87.
ShahM. (2012). The importance and benefits of teacher professional collegiality in schools: Literature review. Procedia: Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46, 1242–1246.
88.
ShipleyB. (2000). Cause and correlation in biology: A user's guide to path analysis, structural equations, and causal inference.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89.
SkaalvikE. M., & SkaalvikS. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1059–1069.
90.
SmithM., & BourkeS. (1992). Teacher stress: Examining a model based on context, workload and satisfaction. Teacher and Teacher Education, 8(1), 31–16.
91.
SofoF., FitzgeraldR., & JawasU. (2012). Instructional leadership in Indonesian school reform: Overcoming the problems to move forward. School Leadership and Management, 32(5), 503–522.
92.
StenmarkC. K., & MumfordM. D. (2011). Situational impacts on leader ethical decision-making. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 942–955.
93.
StodgillR. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research.New York, NY: Free Press
94.
TaylorJ. W., & MasihC. J. (2002). Leadershp approach, school, climte, and teacher commitment: A Philippine perspective. Christian Education Journal, 6, 83–110.
95.
ValentineJ., & PraterM. (2011). Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership and student achievement: High school principals make a difference. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 5–30.
96.
WesthuizenD. W. V. D., PachecoG., & WebberD. J. (2012). Culture, participative decision making and job satisfaction. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(13), 2661–2679.
97.
WilsonS. J., & LipseyM. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(Supplement 2), 130–143.
98.
WoolfolkA. E., RosoffB., & HoyW. K. (1990). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137–148.
99.
YuklG. A. (1989). Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
100.
ZaccaroS. J., KempC., & BaderP. (2004). Leadership traits and attributes. In AntonakisJ., CiancioloA. T., & StenbergR. J. (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 101–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
