Principals play a critical role in school-community engagement, yet there are a dearth of instruments to measure principals’ knowledge and practice in this area. This study therefore describes the research base of community equity literacy and explains why it is essential to the work of school principals and their leadership teams. It also examines the results of a pilot survey of an experienced group of aspiring school principals as a way to further develop an instrument to assess educational leaders’ community equity literacy. This article concludes with implications for leader preparation and future research.
AdamsC. M., & Jean-MarieG. (2011). A diffusion approach to the study of leadership reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(4), 354–377.
2.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council for Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological tests.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Organization.
3.
AuerbachS. (2010). Beyond coffee with the principal: Toward leadership for authentic school-family partnerships. Journal of School Leadership, 20(6), 728–757.
4.
Baquedano-LópezP., AlexanderR. A., & HernándezS. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools what teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 149–182.
5.
BerlinerD. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949–995.
6.
BiemerP., GroversR., LybergL., MathiowetzN., & SudmanS. (2004). Measurements errors in surveys.New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
BlankM. J., BergA. C., & MelavilleA. (2006). Growing Community Schools: The Role of Cross-Boundary Leadership. Coalition for Community Schools.
8.
BrownK. M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77–108.
9.
BrykA. S., SebringP. B., AllensworthE., EastonJ. Q., & LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago.University of Chicago Press.
10.
Byrne-JimenezM., & OrrM. (2013). Evaluating social justice leadership preparation. In TillmanL. L., & ScheurichJ. J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational leadership for diversity and equity (pp. 670–702). New York, NY: Routledge.
CampanoG., GhisoM. P., & WelchB. (2015). Ethical and professional norms in community-based research. Harvard Educational Review, 85(1), 29–49.
13.
CapperC. A., TheoharisG., & SebastianJ. (2006). Toward a framework for preparing leaders for social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(3), 209–224.
14.
CopperC., RiehlC., & HasanA. (2011). Leading and learning with diverse families in schools: Critical epistemology amid communities of practice. Journal of School Leadership, 20(6), 758–788.
15.
DesimoneL., & LeFlochK. (2004). Probing the “trickle down” effect of standards and assessments: Are we asking the right questions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 1–22.
16.
Educational Testing Services. (2000). ETS standards for quality and fairness.Princeton, NJ.
17.
EpsteinJ. L., & SandersM. G. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 81–120.
18.
ErnstC., & Chrobot-MasonD. (2010). Boundary spanning leadership: Six practices for solving problems, driving innovation, and transforming organizations.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
19.
EvansA. E. (2007). School leaders and their sensemaking about race and demographic change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 159–188.
20.
FratturaE. M., & CapperC. A. (2007). Leading for social justice: Transforming schools for all learners.Newbury Park, CA: Crowin Press.
21.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York, NY: Continuum.
22.
GallowayM. K., & IshimaruA. M. (2015). Radical recentering equity in educational leadership standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 372–408.
23.
GlaserB., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.New York, NY: Alpine.
24.
GermainM. L. (2006). Stages of psychometric measure development: The Example of the Generalized Expertise Measure (GEM). Online Submission.
25.
GoldringE., PorterA., MurphyJ., ElliottS. N., & CravensX. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1–36.
26.
GoldringE. B., & HausmanC. (2001). Civic capacity and school principals: The missing links for community development. In CrowsonR. L. (Ed.), Community development and school reform (pp. 193–210). Kidlington, England: Emerald Group.
27.
GorskiP. (2013). Reaching and teaching students in poverty: Strategies for erasing the opportunity gap.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
GreenT. L. (2015a). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(8), 679–711.
29.
GreenT. L. (2015b). Places of inequality, places of possibility: Mapping “opportunity in geography” across urban school-communities. The Urban Review, 47(4), 717–741.
30.
GreenT. L. (2016a). From positivism to critical theory: School-community relations toward community equity literacy. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(4), 370–387.
31.
GreenT. L. (2016b). Community-based equity audits: A practical approach for school and community leaders in supporting equitable school-community improvements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(1), 3–39.
32.
GreenT. L. (in press). Enriching educational leadership practice through community equity literacy: A conceptual foundationLeadership and Policy in Schools.
33.
GreenT. L., & GoodenM. A. (2014). Transforming out-of-school challenges into opportunities: Community schools reform in the urban Midwest. Urban Education, 49(8), 930–954.
34.
GummerE. S., & MandinachE. B. (2015). Building a conceptual framework for data literacy. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–22.
35.
GutiérrezR. (2009). Framing equity: Helping students “play the game” and “change the game.”Teaching for Excellence and Equity in Mathematics, 1(1), 4–8.
36.
HendersonA. T., MappK. L., JohnsonV. R., & DaviesD. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family-school partnerships.New York, NY: New Press.
37.
HorsfordS. D. (2010). Mixed feelings about mixed schools: Superintendents on the complex legacy of school desegregation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(3), 287–321.
38.
HorsfordS. D. (2014). When race enters the room: Improving leadership and learning through racial literacy. Theory Into Practice, 53(2), 123–130.
39.
HorsfordS. D., & SampsonC. (2014). Promise neighborhoods: The promise and politics of community capacity building as urban school reform. Urban Education, 49(4), 955–991.
40.
IshimaruA. (2013). From heroes to organizers: Principals and education organizing in urban school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(3), 3–51.
41.
IshimaruA. M., & GallowayM. K. (2014). Beyond individual effectiveness: Conceptualizing organizational leadership for equity. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(1), 93–146.
42.
Jean-MarieG., & CurryK. (2012). Cross-boundary leadership: A reform model in Title I elementary schools. In AikenJ., & Gerstl-PepinC. (Eds.), Social Justice Leadership for a Global World. Book series: Educational Leadership for Social Justice (pp. 287–306). North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
43.
Jean-MarieG., RuffinV., & BurrK. (2010). Leading across boundaries: The role of community schools and cross-boundary leadership in school reform. In HorsfordS. (Ed.), New perspectives in educational leadership: Exploring social, political, and community contexts and meaning (pp. 217–238). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
44.
Keith (1996). Can urban school reform and community development be joined? The potential of community schools. Education and Urban Society, 28(2), 237–268.
45.
KelleyC., & HalversonR. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of leadership for learning: A next generation formative evaluation and feedback system. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 3(2), 1–22.
46.
KhalifaM. (2012). A re-new-ed paradigm in successful urban school leadership: Principal as community leader. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 424–467.
47.
KretzmannJ., & McKnightJ. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets.Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.
48.
LowenhauptR. (2014). School access and participation: Family engagement practices in the new Latino diaspora. Education and Urban Society, 46(5), 522–547.
49.
LyonL., & DriskellR. (2012). The community in urban society.Long Grove, IL: Waveland.
50.
MappK. L., & HongS. (2010). Debunking the myth of the hard to reach parent. In ChristensonS., & ReschlyA. (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships (p. 345–361). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
McKenzieK. B., ChristmanD. E., HernandezF., FierroE., CapperC. A., DantleyM., GonzalesM. L., Cambron-McCabeN., & ScheurichJ. J. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111–138.
52.
McKoyD., VincentJ. M., & BierbaumA. H. (2011). Opportunity-rich schools and sustainable communities: Seven steps to align high-quality education with innovations in city and metropolitan planning and development. Retrieved from http://citiesandschools.berkeley.edu/reports/ccs_wwc_%20report.pdf.
53.
MillerP. (2008). Examining boundary-spanning leaders in community contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 353–377.
54.
MillerP. (2012). Mapping educational opportunity zones: A geospatial analysis of neighborhood block groups. Urban Review, 44(2), 189–218.
55.
MillerP., BrownT., & HopsonR. (2011). Centering love, hope, and trust in the community: Transformative urban leadership informed by Paulo Freire. Urban Education, 46(5), 1078–1099.
56.
MillerP., WillsN., & ScanlanM. (2013). Educational leadership on the social frontier: Developing promise neighborhoos in urban and tribal settings. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(4), 543–575.
57.
MilnerR. (2013). Analyzing poverty, learning, and teaching through a critical race lens. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 1–53.
58.
MilnerH. R.IV, MurrayI. E., FarindeA. A., & Delale-O'ConnorL. (2015). Outside of School Matters: What We Need to Know in Urban Environments. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(4), 529–548.
59.
MinklerM., & HancockT. (2008). Community-driven asset identification and issue selection. In MinklerM., & WallersteinN. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 153–167). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
60.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration (2015). Professional Standards for Educational Leaders 2015.Reston, VA: Author.
61.
NogueraP., & WellsL. (2011). The politics of school reform: A broader and bolder approach for Newark. Berkeley Review of Education, 2(1), 5–25.
62.
O'MalleyM. P., & CapperC. A. (2014). A Measure of the Quality of Educational Leadership Programs for Social Justice Integrating LGBTIQ Identities Into Principal Preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 0013161X14532468.
PorterA. C., PolikoffM. S., GoldringE., MurphyJ., ElliottS. N., & MayH. (2010). Developing a psychometrically sound assessment of school leadership: The VAL-ED as a case study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 135–173.
65.
PowellJ., ReeceJ., & GambhirS. (2007). The geography of opportunity: Austin region.Kirwan Institute for The Study of Race and Ethnicity.
66.
RallisS. F., & GoldringE. B. (2000). Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of dynamic schools.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
67.
RubinH. (1994). There aren't going to be any bakeries here if there is no money to afford jellyrolls: The organic theory of community based development. Social Problems, 41(3), 401–424.
68.
SandersM., & HarveyA. (2002). Beyond the school walls: A case study of principal leadership for school-community collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1345–1368.
69.
ScanlanM., & JohnsonL. (2015). Leadership for increasingly diverse schools. In TheoharisG., & ScanlanM. (Eds.), (pp. 162–186). New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.
70.
SchutzA. (2006). Home is a prison in the global city: The tragic failure of school-based community engagement strategies. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 691–743.
ValenciaR. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice.New York, NY: Routledge.
73.
WarrenM. R. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 133–173.
74.
WarrenM. R., HongS., RubinC. L., & UyP. S. (2009). Beyond the bake sale: A community based relational approach to parent engagement in schools. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 2209–2254.
