This qualitative study examined the development of prospective leaders (PLs) from nonuniversity-based leadership preparation programs along two core dimensions identified as critical to leaders’ capacity to affect change—inclusive-facilitative and instructional leadership (Bryk, Sebring, Allensworth, Luppescu, & Easton, 2010). Within the core area of instructional leadership, participants learned to focus on supporting individual teachers, establish a vision for learning, and link individual practice to school-wide goals. In inclusive-facilitative leadership, participants highlighted bringing stakeholders together and enlarging capacity through distributed leadership. The analysis identifies important ways in which instructional and inclusive-facilitative leadership are interdependent and makes recommendations for leadership preparation programs.
Bambrick-SantoyoP. (2010). Driven by data: A practical guide to improve instruction.John Wiley & Sons.
2.
BrykA. S., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York City, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
BrykA. S., SebringP. B., AllensworthE., LuppescuS., & EastonJ. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
CheneyG. R., DavisJ., GarrettK., & HolleranJ. (2010). A new approach to principal preparation.Fort Worth, TX: Rainwater Charitable Foundation.
5.
CityE. A., ElmoreR. F., FlarmanS. E., & TeitelL. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
6.
CoffeyA., & AtkinsonP. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
7.
CresswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches.Lincoln, OR: Sage.
8.
Darling HammondL., LaPointeM., MeyersonD., OrrM. T., & CohenC. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs.Stanford, CA: The Wallace Foundation.
9.
Drago SeversonE. (2009). Leading adult learning: Supporting adult development in our schools.Sage Publications.
10.
FeredayJ., & Muir-CochraneE. (2008). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,5(1), 80–92.
11.
GlickmanC. D., GordonS. P., & Ross-GordonJ. M. (2010). Supervision and instructional leadership.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
GrissomJ. A., LoebS., & MasterB. (2013). Effective Instructional lime Use for School Leaders Longitudinal Evidence From Observations of Principals.Educational Researcher, doi: 10.3102/0013189X13510020.
13.
HallingerP. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research.Journal of Educational Administration,49(2), 125–142.
14.
HallingerP., & MurphyJ. F. (2013). Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning.NASSP Bulletin, doi: 10.1177/0192636512469288.
15.
HalversonR., GriggJ., PrichettR., & ThomasC. (2007). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in school.Journal of School Leadership,17, 159–194.
16.
HalversonR., PritchettR. B., & WatsonJ. G. (2007). Formative feedback systems and the new instructional leadership.WCER Working Paper No. 2007-3. Madison, WI.
17.
HorngE., & LoebS. (2010). New thinking about instructional leadership.Phi Delta Kappan,92(3), 66–69.
18.
HoyW. K., & Tschannen-MoranM. (1999). Five faces of trust: An empirical confirmation in urban elementary schools.Journal of School Leadership,9(May), 184–208.
19.
HuberS. G. (2008). School development and school leader development: New learning opportunities for school leaders and their schools. In LumbyJ., CrowG., & PashiardisP. (Eds.), International handbook on the preparation and development of school leaders (pp. 163–175). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
JacobsonS. L., & CypresA. (2012). Important Shifts in Curriculum of Educational Leadership Preparation.Journal of Research on Leadership Education,7(2), 217–236.
21.
KnappM. S., CoplandM. A., & TalbertJ. E. (2003). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders.Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
22.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005.Leadership and Policy in Schools,4(3), 177–199.
23.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy.Educational Administration Quarterly,44(4), 496–528.
24.
LeithwoodK., & LevinB. (2008). School development and school leader development: New learning opportunities for school leaders and their schools. In LumbyJ., CrowG., & PashiardisP. (Eds.), International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders (pp. 280–300). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
LeithwoodK., LouisK. S., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: A review of research for the Learning from Leadership Project, New York, NY: The Wallace Foundation.
26.
LevineA. (2005). Educating school leaders.New York City: The Education Schools Project.
27.
LouisK. S., LeithwoodK., WahlstromK., & AndersonS. (2010). Learning from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning.Learning from Leadership Project, Minnesota: Wallace Foundation.
28.
LouisK. S., MayrowetzD., SmileyM., & MurphyJ. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership.Distributed Leadership (pp. 157–180). Springer.
29.
MarshallC., & RossmanG. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research.Sage Publications, Inc.
30.
MarzanoR. J., McNultyB. A., & WatersT. (2005). School Leadership That Works: From Research to Results.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31.
McCarthyM. (1999). The evolution of educational leadership preparation programs.Handbook of research on educational administration,2, 119–139.
32.
NeumerskiC. M. (2013). Rethinking Instructional Leadership, a Review What Do We Know About Principal, Teacher, and Coach Instructional Leadership, and Where Should We Go From Here?Educational Administration Quarterly,49(2), 310–347.
33.
OrrM. T., & OrphanosS. (2011). How graduate-level preparation influences the effectiveness of school leaders: A comparison of the outcomes of exemplary and conventional leadership preparation programs for principals.Educational Administration Quarterly, 1–54.
34.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (Vol. Second Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
35.
PerezL. G., UlineC. L., JohnsonJ.J. F., James-WardC., & BasomM. R. (2011). Foregrounding fieldwork in leadership preparation: The transformative capacity of authentic inquiry.Educational Administration Quarterly, 1–41.
36.
PounderD. (2011). Leadership preparation special issue: Implications for policy, practice, and research.Educational Administration Quarterly, 1–11.
37.
PounderD. (2012). School Leadership Preparation and Practice Survey Instruments and Their Uses.Journal of Research on Leadership Education,7(2), 254–274.
38.
RobinsonV. M., LloydC. A., & RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types.Educational Administration Quarterly.
39.
ShererJ. Z., & SpillaneJ. P. (2011). Constancy and change in work practice in schools: The role of organizational routines.Teachers College Record,113(3), 611–657.
40.
SpeckM., & KnipeC. (2001). Why Can't We Get It Right? Professional Development in Our Schools: ERIC.
41.
SpillaneJames P. (2006). Distributed leadership.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
SupovitzJ., SirinidesP., & MayH. (2009). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning.Educational Administration Quarterly.
43.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.American Journal of Evaluation,27(2), 237–246.
44.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Innovative Pathways to School Leadership.Washington, DC: Office of Innovation and Improvement.
45.
Wallace Foundation. (2009). Assessing the Effectiveness of School Leaders: New Directions and New Processes Perspective.New York, NY: Author.
46.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5): Sage Publications.
47.
ZepedaS. J. (2012). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts.New York, NY: Eye on Education.
