This study examines the relationship between two first-year teachers and how organizational behavior influences their socialization when implementing an external mandate. The primary interests of this qualitative study are the organization behavior related to socializing newcomers, the manner in which new teaching roles and behaviors are realized, and the potential tension that can exist between what teachers believe their role should be and the role expectations of the organization. The findings suggest that how schools react to external mandates can influence the manner in which new teachers are socialized into their new role, potentially resulting in less desirable teaching practices.
AchinsteinB., & OgawaR. T. (2006). (In)Fidelity: What resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies.Harvard Educational Review,76(1), 30–63.
2.
AchinsteinB., OgawaR. T., & SpeiglmanA. (2004). Are we creating separate and unequal tracks of teachers? The effects of state policy, local conditions, and teacher characteristics on new teacher socialization.American Educational Research Journal,41(3), 557–603.
3.
AngrosinoM. V. (2005). Recontextualizing observation: Ethnography, pedagogy, and the prospects for a political agenda. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 729–746). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4.
AtkinsonP., & DelamontS. (2008). Analytic perspectives. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 285–311). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
5.
BlackW. R., & ShircliffB. J. (2013). Negotiating the downward rush: An exploration of school leaders’ strategic implementation of accountability policies. In BarnettB., ShohoA. R., & BowersA. J. (Eds.), School and district leadership in an era of accountability (pp. 109–139). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
6.
BohmanJ. F., HileyD. R., & ShustermanR. (Eds.) (1991). The interpretive turn.The interpretive turn: Philosophy, science, culture (pp. 1–14). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
BruggencateG., LuytenH., SchreensJ., & SleegersP. (2012). Modeling the influence of school leaders on student achievement: How can school leaders make a difference?Educational Administration Quarterly,48(4), 699–732.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CreswellJ. W., & MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry.Theory into Practice,39(3), 124–130.
12.
CrottyM. (2003). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspectives in the research process.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
DalyA. J., Der-MartirosianC., Ong-DeanC., ParkV., and Wishard-GuerraA. (2011). Leading under sanction: Principals’ perceptions of threat rigidity, efficacy, and leadership in underperforming schools.Leadership and Policy in Schools,10(2), 171–206. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2011.557517.
14.
DornS. (2007). Accountability Frankenstein: Understanding and taming the monster.Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
15.
HessF. M. (2009). Revitalizing teacher education by revisiting our assumptions about teaching.Journal of Teacher Education,60(5), 450–457. doi: 10.1177/0022487109348595.
16.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis.American Educational Research Journal,38(3), 499–534.
17.
IngersollR. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America's schools.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
KeltchermansG., & BalletK. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction. A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialisation.Teaching and Teacher Education,18(1), 105–120. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00053-1.
LeithwoodK., & SunJ. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research.Educational Administration Quarterly,48(3), 387–423.
21.
LortieD. C. (1975). Schoolteacher (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The Chicago University Press.
22.
MatskoK. K., & HammernessK. (2014). Unpacking the “urban” in urban teacher education: Making a case for greater context-specific preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,65(2), 128–144.
23.
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
24.
OlsenB., & SextonD. (2009). Threat rigidity, school reform, and how teachers view their work inside current education policy contexts.American Educational Research Journal,46(1), 9–44. doi: 10.3102/000283120831208320573.
25.
PogodzinskiB. (2012). Socialization of novice teachers.Journal of School Leadership,22(5), 982–1023.
26.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
ScheinE. H. (2003). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. In PorterL. W., AngleH. L., & AllenR. W. (Eds.), Organizational influence processes (2nd ed.) (pp. 283–294). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
28.
ScottW. R. (2002). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
29.
SmagorinskyP., RhymD., & MooreC. P. (2013). Competing centers of gravity: A beginning English teacher's socialization process within conflictual settings.English Education,45(2), 147–183.
30.
SlawB. M., SanderlandsL. E., & DuttonJ. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly,26(4), 501–524. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2392337.
31.
ThoonenE. E. J., SleegersP. J. C., OortF. J., PeetsmaT. T. D., & GeijselF. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices.Educational Administration Quarterly,47(3), 496–536.
Van MaanenJ., & ScheinE. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In StawB. M. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior: Vol. 1. An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 209–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
34.
ZeichnerK. M., & GoreJ. (1990). Teacher socialization. In HoustonW. R., HabermanM., SikulaJ. P., & Association of Teacher Educators (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 329–348). New York, NY: Macmillan.
35.
ZeichnerK. M., & TabachnickB. R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education ‘washed out’ by school experience?Journal of Teacher Education,32(3), 7–11.
36.
ZeichnerK. M., & TabachnickB. R. (1985). The development of teacher perspectives: Social strategies and institutional control in the socialization of beginning teachers.Journal of Education for Teaching,11(1), 1–25.
