This mixed-method study examined the ways that principals and teachers coparticipated in discipline-focused online communities of practice designed to foster instructional improvement in two middle schools. Findings derived from interviews and content analysis of the online discussion threads revealed the emergence of a shared language about learning between principals and teachers, as well as how the scaffolding of knowledge development among those teachers was supported. Principal participation allowed teachers to gain insights about their principals’ priorities, values, and beliefs about learning and was found to influence the quality of teacher-developed instructional units and teaching efficacy. Participative and directive leadership styles were represented by the principals, and their influence on the communication process and performance outcomes is discussed.
BarabS. A., MakinsterJ., & SchecklerR. (2004). Designing system dualities: Characterizing an online professional development community. In BarabS. A., KlingR., & GrayJ. (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 53–90). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BausmithJ., & BarryC. (2011). Revisiting professional learning communities to increase college readiness: The importance of pedagogical content knowledge.Educational Researcher,40(4), 175–178.
BolmanL., & DealT. (2002). Leading with soul and spirit.The School Administrator,59(2), 21–26.
6.
BrownA. (1994). An evaluation design for a community school cluster. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, New York.
7.
BrownA., & CampioneJ. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In McGillyK. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
8.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership.New York: Harper & Row.
9.
CavanaughR., & DellarG. (1997, March). Towards a model of school culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
10.
ChanT., & PoolH. (2002, April). Principals’ priorities versus their realities: Reducing the gap. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
11.
CranstonJ. (2009). Holding the reins of the professional learning community: Eight themes from research on principals’ perceptions of professional learning communities.Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy,90, 1–22.
12.
CreswellJ., & Plano-ClarkV. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
CrowG., MatthewsJ., & McClearyL. (1996). Leadership: A relevant and realistic role for principals.Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (1996). The quiet revolution: Rethinking teacher development.Educational Leadership,53(6), 4–10.
15.
Darling-HammondL. (2003). Enhancing teaching. In OwensW., & KaplanL. S. (Eds.), Best practices, best thinking and emerging issues in leadership (pp. 75–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education,57(3), 300–314.
17.
Drago-SeversonE. (2005, April). New opportunities for principal leadership: Shaping school cultures for sustaining teacher development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
18.
Drago-SeversonE., & PintoK. (2003, April). School leadership in support of teachers’ transformational learning: Drawing from the well of human resources. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
19.
DuFourR. (2006). Collaboration is the key to unlocking potential.Learning Principal,2(3), 1, 6–7.
20.
DuFourR., DuFourR., EakerR., & ManyT. (2010). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
21.
FlemingG. (1999). Principals and teachers: Continuous learners.Issues … About Change,7(2), 1–9.
22.
FreemanW., & BrettC. (2012). Prompting authentic blogging process in an online graduate course.Computers & Education,59(3), 1032–1041.
23.
FullanM. (2002). The change leader.Educational Leadership,59(8), 16–21.
24.
FullanM. (2004). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25.
GaretM. S., PorterA. C., DesimoneL., BirmanB. F., & YoonK. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers.American Educational Research Journal,38(4), 915–945.
26.
GlazerE. M., & HannafinM. J. (2006). The collaborative apprenticeship model: Situated professional development within school settings.Teaching & Teacher Education,22(2), 179–193.
27.
GlickmanC. D., GordonS. P., & Ross-GordonJ. M. (2010). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
GrahamP. (2007). Improving teacher effectiveness through structured collaboration: A case study of a professional learning community.Research in Middle Level Education,31(1), 1–17.
29.
GreavesT. W., HayesJ., WilsonL., GielniakM., & PetersonE. L. (2012). Revolutionizing education through technology: The Project Red road map for transformation.Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
30.
HawkesM. (1999, July-August). Exploring network-based communication in teacher professional development.Educational Technology, pp. 45–52.
31.
HochbergE. D., & DesimoneL. M. (2011). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards.Educational Psychologist,45(2), 89–106.
32.
HoyW. K., & SweetlandS. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures.Educational Administration Quarterly,37(3), 296–321.
33.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2008). National educational technology standards for teachers.Eugene, OR: Author.
34.
KatzenbachJ., & SmithD. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high performance organization.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
35.
KnezekG., & ChristensenR. (1997). The Teachers’ Attitude Toward Computers Questionnaire Version 5.1.Denton: University of North Texas & Texas Center for Educational Technology.
36.
KrippendorffK. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
LaferriereT., LamonM., & ChanC. (2006). Emerging e-trends and models in teacher education and professional development.Teaching Education,17(1), 75–90.
38.
LarsenM., & MalenB. (1997, March). The elementary school principal's influence on teachers’ curricular and instructional decisions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
39.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1999). Transformation leadership effects: A replication.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,10(4), 451–479.
40.
LeithwoodK., LouisK. S., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning.New York: Wallace Foundation.
41.
LiebermanA., & GrolnickM. (1996). Networks and reform in American education.Teachers College Record,98(1), 7–46.
42.
LincolnY., & GubaE. (1984). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
LittleJ. W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism.School Leadership and Management,23(4), 401–419.
44.
LouisK. S., DretkzeB., & WahlstromK. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national U.S. survey.School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice,21(3), 315–336.
45.
LouisK. S., MarksH. M., & KruseS. D. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools.American Educational Research Journal,33(4), 757–798.
46.
LumpeA. T., & ChambersE. (2001). Assessing teacher's context beliefs about technology use.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,34(1), 93–107.
47.
ManginM. (2007). Facilitating elementary principals’ support for instructional teacher leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly,43(3), 319–357.
48.
MatthewsL. J., & CrowG. (2003). Being and becoming a principal: Role conceptions for contemporary principals and assistant principals.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
MaxcyS. J. (1995). Democracy, chaos, and the new school order.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
50.
MayH., & SupovitzJ. A. (2011). The scope of principal efforts to improve instruction.Education Administration Quarterly,47(2), 332–352.
51.
McIntyreD., & HaggerH. (1996). Mentoring: Challenges for the future. In McIntyreD., & HaggerH. (Eds.), Mentors in schools: Developing the profession of teaching (pp. 165–169). London, UK: David Fulton.
52.
MeyerhoffM. (2002). Sociolinguistic variation and change.Journal of Language & Social Psychology21(4), 442–447.
53.
MullenC., & HutingerJ. (2008). The principal's role in fostering collaborative learning communities through faculty study group development.Theory Into Practice,47(4), 276–285.
54.
MurphyS., & FiedlerF. (1992). Cognitive resource theory and utilization of the leader's and group member's technical competence.Leadership Quarterly,3, 237–255.
55.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.
SchrumL., GalizioL. M., & LedesmaP. (2011). Educational leadership and technology integration: An investigation into preparation, experiences, and roles.Journal of School Leadership,21(2), 241–261.
59.
SchwarzerR., & JerusalemM. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In WeinmanJ., WrightS., & JohnstonM. (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio—Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
ScribnerJ., SawyerR. K., WatsonS., & MyersV. (2007). Teacher teams and distributed leadership: A study of group discourse and collaboration.Educational Administration Quarterly,43(1), 67–100.
62.
SebastianJ., & AilensworthE. (2012). The influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning: A study of mediated pathways to learning.Education Administration Quarterly,48(4), 626–663.
63.
SergiovanniT. J., & StarrattR. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
64.
SheppardB. (1996). Exploring the transformational nature of instructional leadership.Alberta Journal of Educational Research,42(4), 325–344.
65.
SomechA., & WenderowM. (2006). The impact of participative and directive leadership on teachers’ performance: The intervening effects of job structuring, decision domain and leader-member exchange.Educational Administration Quarterly,42(5), 746–772.
66.
SpillaneJ., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Educational Researcher,30(3), 23–31, 39.
67.
StakeR. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
StuartL. H., MillsA. M., & RemusU. (2009). School leaders, ICT competence and championing innovations.Computers & Education,53, 733–741.
69.
SupovitzJ., SirinidesP., & MayH. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning.Education Administration Quarterly,46(1), 31–58.
70.
TillmanL. (2005). Mentoring new teachers: Implications for leadership practice at an urban school.Educational Administration Quarterly,41(4), 609–629.
71.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust.Educational Administration Quarterly,45(2), 217–247.
72.
Tschannen-MoranM., & HoyW. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct.Teaching and Teacher Education,17, 783–805.
73.
Tschannen-MoranM., & Woolfolk-HoyA. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers.Teaching and Teacher Education,23(6), 944–956.
74.
ValliL., & BueseD. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability.American Educational Research Journal,44(3), 519–558.
75.
WengerE. C., & SnyderW. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier.Harvard Business Review,78(1), 139–145.
76.
WixsonK., & YochumN. (2004). Research on literacy policy and professional development: National, state, district, and teacher contexts.Elementary School Journal,105(2), 219–242.
77.
Woolfolk-HoyA., & DavisH. A. (2006). Teacher self-efficacy and its influence on the achievement of adolescents. In PajaresF., & UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy of adolescents (pp. 117–137). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
78.
WubbelsT. (2007). Do we know a community of practice when we see one?Technology, Pedagogy and Education,16(2), 225–233.
79.
YinR. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage.
