This study examines the perspectives of Wyoming instructional facilitators, concerning three coaching constructs—namely, their instructional leadership roles, teachers’ instructional practices, and the support that they receive from principals and teachers. Findings suggest that instructional facilitators were positive about their instructional leadership roles and about the support received from principals yet were neutral concerning teachers’ autonomy about instructional practices. Instructional facilitators highlighted their roles in mentoring, coaching, and data analysis. Significant differences were found concerning the perceptions of technology instructional facilitators and high school instructional facilitators about their leadership roles, teachers’ instructional practice, and support received from principals.
BlameyK. L., MeyerC. K., & WalpoleS. (2009). Middle and high school literacy coaches: A national survey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 52(4), 310–323.
3.
BlaseJ., & BlaseJ. (1998). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principals promote teaching and learning.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
4.
BlaseJ., & BlaseJ. (2000). Effective instructional leadership: Teachers’ perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 130–141.
BoulwareD. (2006). High school literacy coaches in Florida: A study of background, time, and other factors and the relationship to reading achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando.
7.
BulyM. R., CoskieT., RobinsonL., & EgawaK. (2006). Literacy coaching: Coming out of the corner. Voices From the Middle, 13(4), 24–28.
8.
BurkinsJ. M. (2007). Coaching for balance: How to meet the challenges of literacy coaching.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
9.
BurkinsJ. M. (2009). Practical literacy coaching: A collection of tools to support your work.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10.
CaloK. (2008). An exploration of middle school literacy coaching across the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
11.
CaseyK. (2006). Literacy coaching: The essentials.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
CostaA. L., & GarmstonR. J. (2002). Cognitive coaching: A foundation for renaissance schools (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
14.
DareshJ. C. (2001). Supervision as proactive leadership (3rd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
15.
DeanM. J. (2010). Principals’ perceptions of the effectiveness of reading coaches and necessity of reading coaches within elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
16.
DentonC. A., & HasbrouckJ. (2009). A description of instructional coaching and its relationship to consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19(2), 150–175.
17.
DiPaolaM. F., & HoyW. K. (2008). Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18.
DuFourR. (2002). Time, perspective, and priorities. In EakerR., DuFourR., & BurnetteR. (Eds.), Getting started: Reculturing schools to become professional learning communities (pp. 31–56). Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
19.
DuFourR., & EakerR. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement.Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
20.
DuncanH. E., & YoungS. (2009). Online pedagogy and practice: Challenges and strategies. Researcher, 22(1), 17–32.
21.
EmstadA. B. (2011). The principals’ role in the post-evaluation process: How does the principal engage in the work carried out after the school's self-evaluation?Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 23(4), 271–288.
22.
GlatthornA. (1984). Differential supervision.Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23.
GoldsteinJ. (2005). Debunking the fear of peer review: Combining supervision and evaluation and living to tell about it. Journal of Personal Evaluation in Education, 18(4), 235–252.
24.
GreenR. L. (2010). The four dimensions of principal leadership: A framework for leading 21st century schools.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
GrossP. A. (2010). Not another trend: Secondary-level literacy coaching. Clearing House, 83(4), 133–137.
26.
GuthrieJ. W., & SchuermannP. J. (2010). Successful school leadership: Planning, politics, performance, and power.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
HatchJ. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings.Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
HaysL. J., & HarrisC. D. (2003). Using literacy coaching as a means to change science teachers’ attitudes about teaching writing: A case study. Electronic Journal of Literacy Through Science, 3(4), 1–19.
29.
HensonK. T. (2010). Supervision: A collaborative approach to instructional improvement.Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
MakibbinS. S., & SpragueM. M. (1993). The instructional coach: A new role in staff development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED390821)
41.
MarshalK. (2009). Rethinking teacher supervision and evaluation: How to work smart, build collaboration, and close the achievement gap.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
MartinW., StrotherS., BeglauM., BatesL., ReitzesT., & CulpK. M. (2010). Connecting instructional technology professional development to teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(1), 53–74.
43.
MatsumuraL. C., GarnierH. E., & ResnickL. B. (2010). Implementing literacy coaching: The role of school social resources. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. doi:10.3102/0162373710363743
44.
MatsumuraL. C., SartorisM., BickelD. D., & GarnierH. E. (2009). Leadership for literacy coaching: The principal's role in launching a new coaching program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(5), 655–693.
MilitelloM., & JansonC. (2007). Socially focused, situationally driven practice: A study of distributed leadership among school principals and counselors. Journal of School Leadership, 17(4), 409–442.
47.
Minnear-PeplinskiR. M. (2009). Principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of teacher supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
48.
MockelmannJ., WeberE. L., StoryI., LaPlanteA., GettingsC., SimsN., & HedgesS. (2007). School based instructional facilitators/instructional coaches grant: Report to the Wyoming joint education interim committee. Retrieved from http://www.k12.wy.us/A/JEC/Dec07/Instructional_Facilitator_reportJEC.pdf
49.
NameyE., GuestL., ThairuL., & JohnsonL. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative datasets. In GuestG., & MacQueenK. (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–161). Lanham, MD: AltaMira.
50.
NeufeldB., & RoperD. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for development of instructional capacity.Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
51.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
52.
NolanJ. F., & HooverL. A. (2008). Teacher supervision and evaluation: Theory into practice (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
53.
OnwuegbuzieA. J., & LeechN. L. (2005). A typology of errors and myths perpetuated in educational research textbooks. Current Issues in Education, 8(7). Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number7/
54.
OtaibaS. A., HospJ. L., SmarttS., & DoleJ. (2008). The challenging role of a reading coach: A cautionary tale. Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18(2), 124–155.
55.
OvandoM. N. (2001). Teachers’ perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 213–231.
56.
OvandoM. N. (2005). Building instructional leaders’ capacity to deliver constructive feedback to teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 18(3), 171–183.
57.
OvandoM. N., & HarrisB. M. (1993). Teachers’ perceptions of the post-observation conference: Implications for formative evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(4), 301–310.
58.
OwingsW. A., KaplanL. S., NunneryJ., MarzanoR., MyranS., & BlackburnD. (2006). Teacher quality and troops to teachers: A national study with implications for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 90(2), 102–131.
59.
PoglincoS. M., & BachA. J. (2004). The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 398–400.
60.
PoglincoS., BachA., HovdeK., RosenblumS., SaundersM., & SupovitzJ. (2003). The heart of the matter: The coaching model in America's choice schools. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/AC-06.pdf
61.
PophamW. J. (2007). Another bite out of the apple. Educational Leadership, 64(6), 83–84.
62.
RangeB. G., ScherzS., HoltC.R., & YoungS. (2011). Supervision and evaluation: The Wyoming perspective. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 23(3), 243–265.
63.
RobbinsP., & AlvyH. B. (1995). The principal's companion: Strategies and hints to make the job easier.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
64.
RushL., & YoungS. (2011). Wyoming's instructional facilitator program: Teacher's beliefs about the impact of coaching on practice. Rural Educator, 32(2), 13–22.
65.
RutledgeS. A., HarrisD. N., & IngleW. K. (2010). How principals “bridge and buffer” the new demands of teacher quality and accountability: A mixed-methods analysis of teacher hiring. American Journal of Education, 116(2), 211–242.
66.
SaphierJ., & WestL. (2010). How coaches can maximize student learning. Kappan, 91(4), 46–50.
SemadeniJ. H. (2009). Taking charge of professional development: A practical model for your school.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
69.
ShulmanV., SullivanS., & GlanzJ. (2008). The New York City school reform: Consequences for supervision of instruction. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(4), 407–425.
70.
SidlerM. (2008). Rhetoricians, facilitators, models: Interviews with technology trainers. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 8(3), 467–480.
StarrickC. A. (2005). Mentors’, teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of a voluntary elementary literacy mentoring and professional development program: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, Akron, OH.
74.
StrongeJ. H., WardT. J., & GrantL. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 339–355.
75.
SturtevantE. G. (2003). The literacy coach: A key to improving teaching and learning in secondary schools.Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
76.
SturtevantE. G., & LinekW. M. (2007). Secondary literacy coaching: A Macedonian perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(3), 240–250.
77.
TaylorR. T., MoxleyD. E., ChanterC., & BoulwareD. (2007). Three techniques for successful literacy coaching. Principal Leadership, 7(6), 22–25.
78.
ThelningK., PhillipsB., LyonK., & McDonaldJ. (2010). Literacy partnership coaches: A initiative of the south Australian department of education and children's services. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 18(2), 39–48.
79.
UbbenG. C., HughesL. W., & NorrisC. J. (2004). The principal: Creative leadership for excellence in schools (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
80.
WallaceJ. (1998). Collegiality and teachers’ work in the context of peer supervision. Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 81–98.
81.
WalpoleS., & BlameyK. L. (2008). Elementary literacy coaches: The reality of dual roles. Reading Teacher, 62(3), 222–231.
82.
WalpoleS., & McKennaM. C. (2007). The literacy coach's handbook: A guide to research-based practice.New York: Guilford.
83.
WenglinskyH. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality.Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center.
ZepedaS. J. (2004). Instructional leadership for school improvement.Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
86.
ZepedaS. J. (2006). Classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning. In StrongeJ. H. (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (2nd ed., pp. 101–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
87.
ZepedaS. J. (2007). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (2nd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
88.
ZepedaS. J., & KruskampB. (2007). High school department chairs: Perspectives on instructional supervision. High School Journal, 90(4), 44–54.
