This case study describes collaboration between business executives and superintendents to influence local/regional K–12 educational change. Specifically, we examine participant like-mindedness about the ethics and appropriate focus of K–12 intermediary collaboration, the extent of democratic functioning, and key individuals to involve. Data sources consist of existing semistructured interviews with 6 superintendents and 28 business executives involved in intermediary organizations (i.e., chambers of commerce, business– education roundtables, educational nonprofits) within a metropolitan area of the U.S. Southwest. Furman's (2004) ethic of community frames the analysis. Participants narrate common moral purpose motivated by civic duty for the public good over profit-driven interests. Moreover, deficiencies in democratic collaborative processes formed divergent views on how this should be operationalized and thus caused some voices to be silenced. Superintendent inattention to democratic processes reinforced deficiencies despite the enabling potential of certain business executives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbowitzK. K. (2000). Democratic communities and business/education “partnerships” in secondary education. Urban Review, 32(4), 313–341.
2.
AbowitzK. K., & BoylesD. (2000). Private interests or public goods: Dewey, Rugg, and their contemporary allies on corporate involvement in education reform initiatives. InPhilosophy of Education (pp. 131–139). Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
3.
Alberta Department of Education. (1996). Framework for enhancing business involvement in education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED399391)
4.
BarnettB. G., HallG. E., BergJ. H., & CamarenaM. M. (2010). Typology of partnerships for promoting innovation. Journal of School Leadership, 20(1), 10–36.
5.
BartlettL., FederickM., GulbrandsenT., & MurillosourceE. (2002). The marketization of education: Public schools for private ends. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 33(1), 5–29.
6.
BeckL. G., & MurphyJ. (1997). Ethics in educational leadership programs: Emerging models.Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
7.
BennettJ. V. (2010). Leadership for school district and business partnerships. In HoyW. K., & DiPaolaM. (Eds.), Analyzing school contexts: Influences of principals and teachers in the service of students (pp. 135–168). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
8.
BennettJ. V. (2012). School district–chamber partnership development and the role of the superintendent. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
BennettJ. V., & ThompsonH. C. (2011). Changing district priorities for school– business collaboration: Superintendent agency and capacity for institutionalization. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 826–868.
10.
BennettJ. V., & ThompsonH. C. (2012). Superintendent leadership in a local K–12 education–business collaborative: A case study of San Pedro County. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
BhattacharyaC. B., KorchunD., & SenS. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 257–272.
12.
Bodinger-de UriateC., Fleming-McCormickT., SchwagerM., ClarkM., & DanzbergerJ. (1996, April). A guide to promising practices in educational partnerships.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED392980)
13.
BrentB. O., & LundenS. (2009). Much ado about very little: The benefits and costs of school-based commercial activities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(3), 307–336.
14.
BrownP. (2005). The shadow curriculum. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 104(1), 119–139.
15.
BurchP. (2002). Constraints and opportunities in changing policy environments: Intermediary organizations’ response to complex district contexts. In HightowerA., KnappM., MarshJ., & McLaughlinM., (Eds.), School Districts and Instructional Renewal. (pp. 111–126). New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
BurrellG., & MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life.London: Heinemann.
17.
CampbellJ. L. (2006). Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 925–938.
18.
CaseyJ. C., & O'LearyS. M. (1999). The corporate imperative: A business guide for implementing strategic education partnerships.Washington, DC: Partnership for Family Involvement in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430270)
ClarkT. A. (1992). Collaboration to build competence: The urban superintendents’ perspective. ERIC Review2(2), 2–6.
21.
CornellS. R. (1996). Partnerships that work: Business/education coalitions for the 21st century.St. Louis, MO: National Council for Occupational Education. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED400408)
22.
CoburnC. E. (2005). The role of non-system actors in the relationship between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 23–52.
23.
CowanL. A. (1994). A model for developing business–education partnerships for Tech Prep program.Bellingham: Western Washington University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED376317)
24.
DayC. (2005). Sustaining success in challenging contexts: Leadership in English schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 573–583.
DorscherS. P., & NormoreA. H. (2008). The moral agency of the educational leader in times of national crisis and conflict. Journal of School Leadership, 18(1), 8–31.
28.
FosterW. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration.Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
29.
FurmanG. C. (2004). The ethic of community. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 215–235.
30.
GilesC., JohnsonL., BrooksS., & JacobsonS. L. (2005). Building bridges, building community: Transformational leadership in a challenging urban context. Journal of School Leadership, 15(5), 519–545.
31.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.Chicago, IL: Aldine.
32.
GreenbergR. (1999). Get with the partnership. Techniques: Making Education and Career Connections, 74(4), 14–17.
33.
GrobeT., CurnanS. P., & MelchoirA. (1993). Synthesis of existing knowledge and practice in the field of educational partnerships.Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED362994)
34.
GurrD., DrysdaleL., & MulfordB. (2005). Successful principal leadership: Australian case studies. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 539–551.
35.
HallR. F., CastraleE. G., & ZimmermanS. (1993). Business–education partnerships: Developing a collaborative relationship with business and community.Macomb: Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Western Illinois University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED369169)
36.
HannL. W. (2008, April). Profit and loss in school–business partnerships. District Administration, 44(5), 26–30.
37.
HoffD. (2002). School–business partnerships: It's the schools’ turn to raise the grade. School Community Journal, 12(2), 63–77.
HonigM. I. (2004). Intermediary organizations in educational policy implementation. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 26(1), 65–87.
40.
IntriligatorB. A. (1992). Establishing interorganizational structures that facilitate successful school partnerships. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED347692).
41.
KanterR. M. (1994, July–August). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 96–108.
42.
KaplanG. (1996). Profits r us: Notes on the commercialization of America's schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), K1–K12.
43.
KotterP., & LeeN. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
44.
LevineM., & TrachtmanR. (Eds.) (1988). American business and the public school: Case studies of corporate involvement in public education.New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
LindgreenA., SwaenV., & JohnstonW. J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 303–323.
46.
LongoriaT. (1999). The distribution of public–private partnerships: Targeting of voluntary efforts to improve urban education. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 315–329.
Lozar-GlennJ. (2001). The giving and the taking: Business–education partnerships come of age. Business Education Forum, 55(3), 6–8. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ619212)
49.
BennettJ., & McPhersonL. (2011). Education-business collaboration for teacher retention: Report submitted to San Pedro Loves Teachers. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Educational Policy Studies & Practice, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
50.
MerriamS. B. (2001). Case studies as qualitative research. In ConradC. F., HaworthJ. G., & LattucaL. R. (Eds.), Qualitative research in higher education (pp. 191–200). Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.
51.
MickelsonR. A. (1999). International business machinations: A case study of corporate involvement in local educational reform. Teachers College Record, 100(3), 476–512.
52.
MulfordB., KendallD., EwingtonJ., EdmundsB., KendallL., & HaliaS. (2008). Successful principalship of high-performance schools in high-poverty communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(4), 461–480.
53.
MullenC. A., HarrisS., PryorC. R., & Browne-FerrignoT. (2008). Democratically accountable leadership: Tensions, overlaps, and principles in action. Journal of School Leadership, 18, 224–248.
54.
Murakami-RamalhoE., GarzaE., & MerchantB. (2010). Successful school leadership in socio-economically challenging contexts: School principals creating and sustaining successful school improvement. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(3), 35–55.
55.
NoddingsN. (1988). An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education, 96(2), 215–230.
56.
PashiardisP., SavvidesV., LytraE., & AngelidouK. (2011). Successful school leadership in rural contexts: The case of Cyprus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(5), 536–553.
57.
Pepsin-GertslC., & AikenJ. A. (2009). Democratic school leaderships: Defining ethical leadership in a standardized context. Journal of School Leadership, 19(4), 404–444.
58.
RigdenD. W. (1991). Business/school partnerships: A path to effective school restructuring.New York: Council for Aid to Education.
59.
RigdenD. W. (1992). Business and the schools: A guide to effective programs (2nd ed.). New York: Council for Aid to Education.
60.
ScalesP., FosterK. C., MannesM., HorstM. A., PintoK. C., & RutherfordA. (2005). School–business partnerships, developmental assets, and positive outcomes among urban high school students: A mixed-methods study. Urban Education, 40(2), 144–189.
61.
SergiovanniT. J. (1996). Leadership for the schoolhouse: How is it different? Why is it important?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62.
ShapiroJ. P., & StefkovichJ. A. (2001). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63.
ShapiroJ. P., & StefkovichJ. A. (2005). Ethical leadership and decision making on education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
ShippsD. (1997). The invisible hand: Big business and Chicago school reform. Teachers College Record, 99, 73–116.
65.
ShippsD. (2006). School reform, corporate style: Chicago 1880–2000.Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
66.
SmithJ., & WohlstetterP. (2006). Understanding the different faces of partnering: A typology of public-private partnerships. School Leadership and Management, 26(3), 249–268.
67.
StarrattR. J. (1994). Building an ethical school: A practical response to the moral crisis in schools.Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
68.
StarrattR. J. (1996). Transforming educational administration: Meaning, community, and excellence.New York: McGraw-Hill.
69.
StarrattR. J. (2003). Centering educational administration: Cultivating meaning, community responsibility.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
StarrattR. J. (2004). Ethical leadership.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71.
StarrattR. J. (2005). Responsible leadership. Educational Forum, 69(2), 124–133.
72.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
StrikeK. A., HallerE. J., & SoltisJ. F. (1998). The ethics of school administration (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
74.
TurkerD. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 411–427.
UtterJ., & StandleyM. (2000). School business partnerships: A leader's manual.Anchorage, AL: Visions Technology.
77.
VandegriftJ., & SandlerL. (1993). Evaluating business partnership programs in education: What defines a successful venture?Tempe: Arizona State University, Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
78.
Vander ScheeC., & BoylesD. (2010). “Exergaming,” corporate interests and the crisis discourse of childhood obesity. Sport, Education, and Society, 15(2), 169–185.
79.
VanhammeJ., & GrobbenB. (2009). “Too good to be true!” The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 273–283.
80.
WechterD. (2004). School–business partnership: Awareness, attitudes, and actions of secondary school principals and their business counterparts in selected Florida districts (doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University). Available from ProQuest database. (AAT 3139427)
81.
WoodsG. J., & WoodsP. A. (2005). At the hard edge of change: Views from secondary head teachers on a public-private partnership. Journal of Educational Policy Studies, 20(1), 23–38.
82.
WrayR. D., & HaynesT. (1992, April). Business/education collaboration: Perceived roles for partners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED344306)
83.
YlimakiR., BennettJ., FanJ., & VillasenorE. (2012). Notions of “success” in southern Arizona schools: Principal leadership in changing demographic and border contexts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(2), 168–193.
