This work is grounded in the literature on women in the academy and offers glimpses into four young women professors’ experiences in the field of educational leadership. We utilized reflective practice and interpersonal communication to create a dialogue centered on three qualitative research questions that allows a window into our lives. We share our dialogue around emergent themes, rather than as a transcript of our conversations, for impact and efficiency. These themes form the foundation for ideas for change. Strategies for success are outlined: one-on-one mentor matching for new women faculty and graduate students; mandatory financial support for travel and professional development; gender and cultural sensitivity training for all faculty; an annual review of workload expectations and review of productivity tied to merit raises; institutional efforts to equalize salaries between men and women faculty; on-campus child care options; a commitment to experiment with various course delivery options to help with the work–home balance; and the study of the traditional tenure clock. We conclude with words of encouragement for young women professors and with the goal of helping universities and other faculty understand what young women professors’ experiences are like, to encourage social and policy changes aimed toward improvement and greater inclusion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AckerS., & FeuervergerG. (1996). Doing good and feeling bad: The work of women university teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 401–422.
AndrewsR., & GroganM. (2001, September). Defining preparation and professional development for the future. Paper commissioned for the first meeting of the National Commission for the Advancement of Educational Leadership Preparation, Racine, WI.
6.
ArmentiC. (2004). May babies and posttenure babies: Maternal decisions of women professors. Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 211–231.
7.
BensimonE. M., & MarshallC. (1997). Policy analysis for postsecondary education: Feminist and critical perspectives. In MarshallC. (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis: A perspective from post-secondary education (pp. 1–21). London: Falmer Press.
8.
BenhamM. K. (1997). Silences and serenades: The journeys of three ethnic minority women school leaders. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 28(2), 280–307.
9.
BlackmoreJ., ThomsonP., & BartyK. (2006). Principal selection: Homosociability, the search for security and the production of normalized principal identities. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 34(3), 297–317.
10.
BloomC. M., & ErlandsonD. A. (2003). African American women principals in urban schools: Realities, (re)constructions, and resolutions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 339–369.
11.
BrooksJ., & ToomsA. (2008). A dialectic of social justice: Findings synergy between life and work through reflection and dialogue. Journal of School Leadership, 18(2), 134–163.
12.
BrownK. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 79–110.
13.
CooneyT. M., & UhlenbergP. (1989). Family-building patterns of professional women: A comparison of lawyers, physicians, and postsecondary teachers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 749–758.
14.
HarperE. P., BaldwinR. G., GansnederB. G., & ChronisterJ. L. (2001). Full-time women faculty off the tenure track: Profile and practice. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 237–257.
15.
HochschildA. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home.New York: Viking Press.
16.
IrbyB. J., & BrownG. (2002). Women leaders: Creating inclusive school environments. In KochJ., & IrbyB. (Eds.), Defining and redefining gender equity in education (pp. 43–58). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
17.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation.New York: Basic Books.
18.
LeCompteM. P., & PreissleJ. (1993). The role of theory in the research process. In Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (pp. 116–157). San Diego: Academic Press.
19.
LoderT. L. (2005). Women administrators negotiate work–family conflicts in changing times: An intergenerational perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(5), 741–776.
20.
MarcusJ. (2007). Helping academic families have families and tenure too: Universities discover their self-interest. Changes, 39(2), 27–32.
21.
MasonM. A., & GouldenM. (2002). Do babies matter? The effect of family formation on the lifelong careers of academic men and women. Academe, 88, 21–27.
22.
MasonM. A., & GouldenM. (2004). Marriage and baby blues: Redefining gender equity in the academy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596, 86–103.
23.
MasonM. A., GouldenM., & WolfingerN. H. (2006). Babies matter: Pushing the gender equity revolution forward. In BrackenS. J., AllenJ. K., & DeanD. R. (Eds.), The balancing act: Gendered perspectives in faculty roles and work lives (pp. 9–29). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
24.
MertzN. (1987, November). Why women aren't mentored. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Portland, OR.
25.
MertzN. (2009). Breaking into the all-male club: Female professors of educational administration.New York: State University of New York.
26.
OstermanK. F., & KottkampR. B. (1993). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
27.
PorterS. R., ToutkoushianR. K., & MooreJ. V. (2008). Pay inequities for recently hired faculty, 1988–2004. Review of Higher Education, 31(4), 465–487.
28.
RigerS., StokesJ., RajaS., & SullivanM. (1997). Measuring perceptions of the work environment for female faculty. Review of Higher Education, 21(1), 63–78.
29.
ShermanW. H. (2005). Preserving the status quo or renegotiating leadership: Women's experiences with a district-based aspiring leaders program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(5), 707–740.
30.
ShermanW. H., BeatyD. M., CrumK., & PetersA. (2010). Unwritten: Young women faculty in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(6), 741–754.
31.
ShieldsC. M., & EdwardsM. M. (2005). Dialogue is not just talk: A new ground for educational leadership.New York: Lang.
32.
ShieldsC. M., LaRocqueL. J., & ObergS. L. (2002). A conversation about race and ethnicity: Struggling to understand issues in cross-cultural leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 116–137.
33.
ShortP. M., & RinehartJ. S. (1993). Reflection as a means of developing expertise. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 501–521.
34.
ToutkoushianR. (1998). Racial and marital status differences in faculty pay. Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 513–541.
35.
ToutkoushianR. K., BellasM. L., & MooreJ. V. (2007). The interaction effects of gender, race, and marital status on faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 572–601.
36.
WardK., & Wolf-WendelL. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 233–257.
37.
WeedonC. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
38.
WilsonR. (1999, June 25). Timing is everything: Academe's annual baby boom. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A14.
39.
WolcottH. F. (1992). Posturing in qualitative inquiry. In LeCompteM., MillroyW., & PreissleJ. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 5–52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
WolfingerN. H., MasonM. A., & GouldenM. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Gender, marriage, and fertility in the ivory tower. Journal of Higher Education, 79(4), 388–405.
