Focused on the absence of a viable population of African American women in the superintendency, this study addressed barriers described by 10 credentialed, district-level Southern women who hold advanced education degrees coupled with years of leadership experience. This phenomenological study used interview methodology to uncover the lived experiences of African American women who were positioned professionally to apply for the superintendency. A Black feminist construct was employed to interpret personal themes—early expectations, family influences, ethical beliefs, vigilant preparation—that converged with external themes—disconnection from networks, oppression, and selection processes—to reveal obstacles to applying for the superintendency. Profiles of well-credentialed African American women educators are provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenK., & JacobsonS. (1995). African American women in education administration: The importance of mentors and sponsors. Journal of Negro Education, 64(4), 409–423.
2.
AlstonJ. (1999). Climbing hills and mountain: Black females making it to the superintendency. In BrunnerC. C. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women in the superintendency (pp. 79–90). Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
AlstonJ. (2000). Missing in action: Where are the Black female school superintendents?Urban Education, 35(5), 525–531.
4.
AlstonJ. (2005). Tempered radicals and servant leaders: Black females persevering in the superintendency. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 675–688.
5.
AlstonJ., & JonesS. N. (2002). Carrying the torch of the Jeanes supervisors: 21st century African American female superintendents and servant leadership. In CooperB. C., & FusarelliL. D. (Eds.), The promise and perils of today's school superintendent (pp. 65–75). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
6.
AndrewsW. E., & Simpson-TaylorD. (1995). Confronting race and rage: A study of perspectives. Contemporary Education, 67(1), 38–42.
7.
BaxterE., WrightJ., & BirkelundG. (2000). The gender gap in workplace authority: A cross national study. American Sociological Review, 60(3), 401–435.
8.
BjorkL., GlassT. E., & BrunnerC. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency: 2000.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
9.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
10.
BrunnerC. C. (1998). Can power support an “ethic of care”? An examination of the professional practices of women superintendents. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 4(2), 142–175.
11.
BrunnerC. C. (2000). Unsettled moments in settled discourse: Women superintendents’ experiences in inequality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 76–116.
12.
BrunnerC. C., & GroganM. (2007). Women leading school systems: Uncommon roads to fulfillment.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
13.
BrunnerC. C., OpsalC., & OlivaM. (2006). Disrupting identity: Fertile soil for raising social consciousness in educational leaders. In MarshallC., & OlivaM. (Eds.), Leading for justice: Making revolutions in education (pp. 214–232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
BrunnerC. C., & Peyton-CaireL. (2000). Seeking representation: Supporting Black female graduate students who aspire to the superintendency. Urban Education, 35(5), 532–548.
15.
ChaseS., & BellC. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment: The work narratives of women school superintendents.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
16.
CollinsP. H. (1998). Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17.
CotterD., HermsenJ., OvadiaS., & VannermanR. (2001). The glass ceiling effect. Social Forces, 80(2), 655–681.
18.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
DaleL. F. R. (1998). The Jeanes supervisors in Alabama, 1909–1963. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(5), 1490. (UMI Microform No. 98935325)
20.
GlassT. E., & FranceschiniL. A. (2007). The state of the American school superintendency: A mid-decade study.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
21.
GroganM. (1999). Equity/equality issues of gender, race and class. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 518–536.
22.
GroganM., & HenryM. (1995). Women candidates for the superintendency: Board perspectives. In IrbyB., & BrownG. (Eds.), Women as school executives: Voices and visions (pp. 164–173). Huntsville, TX: Texas Council of Women School Executives.
23.
HansotE., & TyackD. (1982). Manager of virtue.New York: Basic Books.
24.
Hill CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment.New York: Routledge.
25.
HorsfordS. D. (2010). Learning in a burning house: Inequality, ideology, and (dis)integration.New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
Howard-HamiltonM. (2003). Theoretical frameworks for African American women. New Directions for Student Services, 104, 19–28.
27.
JacksonB. L. (1999). Getting inside history against all odds: African American women superintendents. In BrunnerC. C. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women in the superintendency (pp. 141–160). Albany: State University of New York Press.
28.
JonesL. G. E. (1937). The Jeanes teacher in the United States, 1908–1933.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
29.
KowalskiT. J., & StouderJ. G. (1999). Female experiences related to becoming a superintendent. Contemporary Education, 70(4), 32–41.
30.
Lane-WashingtonL., & Wilson-JonesL. (2010). Woman superintendents: Challenges, barriers and experiences as senior level leaders. National Forum of Educational Administration and Supervision Journal, 27(4), 2–8.
31.
LincolnY., & GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
NASC Interim History Writing Committee. (1979). The Jeanes story: A chapter in the history of American education, 1908–1968.Atlanta, GA: Southern Education Foundation.
OrtizF. I. (1998, April). Who controls succession in the superintendency? A minority perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
38.
SandersE. T. W. (1999). Urban school leadership: Issues and strategies.Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
39.
SeidmanI. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research.New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
ShakeshaftC. (1989). Women in education administration (updated ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
41.
SkakeshaftC., BrownG., IrbyB., GroganM., & BallengerJ. (2007). Increasing gender equity in educational leadership. In KleinS. (Eds.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (2nd ed., pp. 103–130). Florence, KY: Erlbaum.
42.
SkrlaL., & HoyleJ. (1999). The politics of the superintendent evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 405–419.
43.
SmithA. B. (1997). Forgotten foundations: The roles of Jeanes teachers in Black education.New York: Vantage Press.
44.
TallericoM. (1999). Gaining access to the superintendency: Headhunting, gender and color. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 5–13.
45.
TallericoM. (2000). Accessing the superintendency: The unwritten rules.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
46.
TaylorK. L., & TillmanL. C. (2009). African American superintendents in public school districts. In TillmanL. C. (Ed.), SAGE handbook of African American education (pp. 249–266). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
TillmanL. (2004). (Un)Intended consequences? The Impact of Brown v. Board of Education decision on the employment status of Black educators. Education and Urban Society, 36(3), 280–303.
